Stagflation, Not Strong Growth, Justifies Pause
It's not an easy time to be a member of the Federal Open Market Committee. You learn in Economics 101 that you tighten interest rates in an inflationary environment and ease on weaker economic demand. When faced with the dreaded "S" word -- stagflation -- there are no sure textbook answers.
So you could hardly fault the FOMC on June 25 for deciding it was best to push the pause button at a Fed Funds rate of 2 percent. With some forecasters now projecting inflation accelerating to as much as 6 percent on price increases in energy, food and other commodities, the Fed could have defended a pause as the best of bad options amid potential stagflation.
Read more here.
This article was originally published in Bloomberg.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogress.org
Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org
Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org
Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org
Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org
