Center for American Progress

States Take Action To Protect Workers Who Need Safe Leave
Report

States Take Action To Protect Workers Who Need Safe Leave

States across the country are passing new and expanded laws protecting workers’ right to time off to address needs in relation to violence.

In this article
People walk along Franklin Street in Reading, PA.
People walk along Franklin Street in Reading, PA, holding red silhouettes to represent those who died as a result of domestic violence, October 18, 2021. (Getty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle/Ben Hasty)

Domestic and sexual violence touches every corner of this country. In the most recent federal data, 47.3 percent of women and 44.2 percent of men reported that they experienced “contact sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking” from an intimate partner at some point in their lives.1 For survivors of such violence, economic independence and personal safety are tightly linked. Workers must be able to take the steps needed to pursue safety—relocating, dealing with legal matters, and pursuing victim services—without risking their job or their paycheck.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

For this reason, states and cities have stepped up to guarantee workers the right to time off from work to address needs in response to violence, a protection known as “safe leave,” which offers an important tool for supporting survivors as they pursue safety. Nearly half of all states now have laws on the books providing some form of safe leave.2 This issue brief details developments in this important area of policy in 2024 and 2025, with state laws providing new and expanded safe leave rights.

See also

New paid sick and safe time laws in Alaska and Missouri

Voters in Alaska3 and Missouri4 resoundingly approved ballot initiatives in 2024 to create new paid sick and safe time laws in their states. Both ballot initiatives included increasing the state minimum wage, underscoring the strong connection between paid time off to address health and safety needs and the economic security of a living wage. Workers will begin earning and using paid sick and safe time under both laws in 2025, starting on May 1 in Missouri5 and on July 1 in Alaska.6

The two laws will offer very similar, though not identical, protections. Under both laws, employees will earn one hour of paid sick and safe time for every 30 hours worked7 and can use up to a 40 or 56 hours per year depending on employer size.8 In each state, workers will be able to use their time when they or a family member must address needs in connection with domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.9 Covered needs in relation to violence include relocating or securing an existing home,10 obtaining legal services,11 preparing for or participating in a civil or criminal proceeding,12 getting services from a victim services organization,13 or getting physical or mental health care.14 In addition, workers in both Missouri and Alaska will be able to use this time for their own or a loved one’s physical or mental health needs, regardless of whether those needs are in relation to violence.15

Workers cannot be required to provide documentation unless their absence is at least three consecutive workdays in Missouri or more than three consecutive workdays in Alaska.16 For longer absences, workers in either state will be able to self-certify their safe leave17 or can choose to provide other documentation.18

47.3%

of women report experiencing “contact sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking” from an intimate partner at some point in their lives

44.2%

of men report experiencing “contact sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking” from an intimate partner at some point in their lives

Expanded safe leave rights in Michigan, Connecticut, and California

Missouri and Alaska join 15 other states, the District of Columbia, and several cities and counties that already have paid sick and safe time laws in place.19 In three of these states, existing sick and safe time laws are becoming stronger and broader, better protecting survivors and their families.

In Michigan, major expansions to the state paid sick and safe time law went into effect on February 21, 2025.20 Previously, Michigan’s paid sick and safe time law only covered employers with at least 50 employees21 and excluded many part-time and seasonal workers.22 The law now applies to employers regardless of size and includes many previously excluded workers,23 though some expanded rights for employees at employers with 10 or fewer employes may be delayed until October.24 Workers can now accrue sick and safe leave more quickly, at a rate of a one hour for every 30 hours worked,25 compared with one hour for every 35 hours worked under the previous iteration.26 Employers can still limit employees to using a maximum of 40 hours of paid sick and safe time per year.27

State and local policymakers must step up to ensure survivors of violence have the time and support they need to protect and care for themselves and their families.

Similarly, Connecticut passed a law substantially improving its paid sick and safe time law,28 adding new and broader protections to a law that broke new ground as the first statewide paid sick and safe time law in 2011.29 While the original law covered only service workers at employers with 50 or more employees,30 as of January 1, 2025, Connecticut law guarantees paid sick and safe time rights to nearly all employees of employers with at least 25 employees.31 The expanded law will cover employers with as few as 11 employees in 2026 and employers of all sizes starting in 2027.32 In addition, safe time in Connecticut can now be used to assist loved ones dealing with the impacts of violence,33 as is the case in nearly all other states,34 while the law previously limited use to when workers themselves experienced violence.35 To make it easier for workers to use their leave, Connecticut employers are no longer allowed to require employees to provide documentation for sick or safe leave.36

Completing the set, workers in California now have added rights to leave to address the impacts of violence thanks to a 2024 law.37 Under the state’s existing paid sick and safe time law,38 paid safe leave can now be used when workers or their loved ones experience “[a]n act, conduct, or pattern of conduct” 1) involving bodily injury or death; 2) use or brandishing of a weapon, including a firearm; or 3) use of or threat to use force against another person as well as in response to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.39 The addition of these broader categories of covered acts of violence makes California a national leader, given that most other state paid sick and safe time laws cover a more restricted range of violence. Workers can now use their time for a broader range of needs in relation to violence, including relocating or securing a new residence,40enrolling a child in a new school or care for a child or care-dependent adult in response to violence,41 seeking legal assistance or participating in legal proceedings,42 and caring for a child or care-dependent adult in response to violence,43 in addition to needs covered under previous law.44

Similar to Connecticut’s changes, California’s new law enables workers to use their paid safe leave to assist a loved one who is a victim of violence in certain situations, such as to help the survivor relocate to safety or accompany them to legal proceedings,45 rather than only being able to access safe leave when they themselves experience violence.46 Furthermore, under a separate statute, employees at employers with 25 or more employees can receive additional unpaid safe leave for the same set of reasons,47 replacing the state’s previous narrower unpaid safe leave law.48

Conclusion

When any workers or their loved ones are facing the impacts of violence, they deserve the ability to pursue safety without putting their job on the line. While work continues to pass a federal paid sick and safe time law,49 state and local policymakers must step up to ensure survivors of violence have the time and support they need to protect and care for themselves and their families.

Endnotes

  1. Ruth W. Leemis and others, “The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2016/2017 Report on Intimate Partner Violence” (Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022), p. 3, available at https://www.cdc.gov/nisvs/documentation/NISVSReportonIPV_2022.pdf.
  2. For more on safe leave generally, see Molly Weston Williamson, “The State of Safe Leave” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2024), https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-state-of-safe-leave/.
  3. Alaska Ballot Measure 1 (2024), to be codified at Alaska Stat. § 23.10.066 et seq., available at https://www.elections.alaska.gov/petitions/23AMLS/23AMLS-Bill.pdf (last accessed January 2025); State of Alaska, “2024 General Election: Election Summary Report,” p. 14, available at https://www.elections.alaska.gov/results/24GENR/ElectionSummaryReport.pdf (last accessed January 2025).
  4. Missouri Proposition A (2024), available at https://www.sos.mo.gov/cmsimages/Elections/Petitions/2024-030.pdf (last accessed January 2025); Clara Bates, “Missourians vote to increase minimum wage, require paid sick leave,” Missouri Independent, November 5, 2024, available at https://missouriindependent.com/2024/11/05/missourians-vote-to-increase-minimum-wage-require-paid-sick-leave/. The law was codified at Missouri Stat. § 290.600 et seq., available at https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=290.600&bid=54968 (last accessed January 2025).
  5. Missouri Stat. § 290.603.1(4)(a); Missouri Stat §290.600(7)–(8).
  6. Alaska Ballot Measure 1 (2024), Section 9.
  7. Missouri Stat. § 290.603.1–2; Alaska Stat. § 23.10.66(a)–(b).
  8. In Missouri, annual use can be capped at 40 hours (employers with fewer than 15 employees) or 56 hours (larger employers). See Missouri Stat. § 290.603.1–2. In Alaska, workers will be able to accrue and use up to 40 hours (employers with fewer than 15 employees) or 56 hours (larger employers). See Alaska Stat. § 23.10.66(a)–(b).
  9. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4). Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  10. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4)(d); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  11. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4)(e); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  12. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4)(e); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  13. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4)(b); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  14. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(4)(a), (c); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(3).
  15. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(1)-(2); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(a)(1)–(2). In Missouri, workers will also be able to use this time for a work, school, or child care closure due to a public health emergency. See Missouri Stat. § 290.606.1(3).
  16. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.7 specifies “three or more consecutive workdays,” while Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(c) specifies “more than three consecutive workdays.”
  17. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.7(2); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(c)(1).
  18. Missouri Stat. § 290.606.7(2); Alaska Stat. § 23.10.067(c).
  19. Williamson, “The State of Safe Leave.” Voters in Nebraska overwhelmingly approved a new paid sick time law by ballot initiative in November 2024. While this law includes important protections for survivors in relation to physical and mental health, it does not include explicit safe leave protections. See Nebraska Initiative 436 (2024), available at https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2024/2024%20Ballot%20Measures%20Pamphlet.pdf (last accessed November 2024); Cindy Gonzales, “Nebraskans vote yes to requiring employers to provide earned paid sick leave,” Nebraska Examiner, November 5, 2025, available at https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/05/nebraskans-vote-yes-to-requiring-employers-to-provide-earned-paid-sick-leave/.
  20. Michigan Public Act 2 (2025), available at https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2025-2026/publicact/pdf/2025-PA-0002.pdf.
  21. Mich. Stat. § 408.962(f), as provided in Michigan Public Act 369 (2019), available at https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2017-2018/publicact/htm/2018-PA-0369.htm.
  22. Mich. Stat. § 408.962(e), as provided in Michigan Public Act 369 (2019), available at https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2017-2018/publicact/htm/2018-PA-0369.htm.
  23. Mich. Stat. § 408.962(e)–(g), as amended by Michigan Public Act 2 (2025).
  24. Mich. Stat. § 408.963(2), as amended by Michigan Public Act 2 (2025), allowing delay for small businesses; Mich. Stat. § 406.962(l), as amended by Michigan Public Act 2 (2025), defining small business.
  25. Mich. Stat. § 408.963(2)–(3), as amended by Michigan Public Act 2 (2025).
  26. Mich. Stat. § 408.963, as provided in Michigan Public Act 369 (2019), available at https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2017-2018/publicact/htm/2018-PA-0369.htm.
  27. Mich. Stat. § 408.963(2), as amended by Michigan H.B. 4002 (2025).
  28. Connecticut Public Act 24-8 (2024), available at https://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=HB05005&which_year=2024.
  29. A Better Balance, “Sick Without A Safety Net” (New York: 2023), p. 3, available at https://www.abetterbalance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Healthy-Families-Act-May-2023-Update-Final.pdf.
  30. Connecticut Public Act 11-52 (2011), Section 2(a), available at https://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/ACT/PA/2011PA-00052-R00SB-00913-PA.htm.
  31. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31–57s(a)(1)(A)(i), available at https://casetext.com/statute/general-statutes-of-connecticut/title-31-labor/chapter-557-employment-regulation/part-iv-general-provisions/section-31-57s-employer-requirement-to-provide-sick-leave-to-service-workers-use-of-leave-employer-compliance-rate-of-pay-during-leave.
  32. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31–57s(a)(1)(A)(ii)–(iii).
  33. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31–57t(a)(5).
  34. Williamson, “The State of Safe Leave.”
  35. See Connecticut Public Act 24-8 (2024), Section 3, amending Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31–57t; Ibid., at Section 1, creating a new Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31–57r(4).
  36. Previously, employers could request documentation for a leave lasting three or more consecutive days. See Connecticut Public Act 24-8 (2024), Section 3, amending Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-57t(b), available at https://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=HB05005&which_year=2024.
  37. A.B. 2499, Chapter 967 (2024), Section 3, to be codified at Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8, available at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2499 (last accessed November 2024).
  38. Cal. Labor Code § 246.5(a)(2), available at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=246.5.&lawCode=LAB (last accessed November 2024).
  39. Cal. Labor Code § 246.5, defining “victim” by cross-reference to Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(j); Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(j), available at https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-gov/title-2/division-3/part-2-8/chapter-6/article-1/section-12945-8/.
  40. Cal. Labor Code § 246.5(a)(2), providing leave for purposes listed in Cal Gov. Code § 12945.8(b); Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(6).
  41. Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(6); Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(10).
  42. Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(8)–(9).
  43. Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(10).
  44. Those new protections join needs covered in relation to violence under the previous iteration of the law, such as seeking a temporary restraining order, accessing medical attention or counseling, participating in safety planning, and seeking services from shelter or victim services organization. For the new law, see Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b)(1)–(5). Previously, the paid sick and safe time law defined covered needs in relation to a different statute, which included these needs. For the 2023 version, see Cal. Labor Code § 246.5(a)(2), available at https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2023/code-lab/division-2/part-1/chapter-1/article-1-5/section-246-5/; Cal Labor Code § 230(c), now repealed, available at https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2023/code-lab/division-2/part-1/chapter-1/article-1/section-230/; Cal. Labor Code 230.1(a), now repealed, available at https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2023/code-lab/division-2/part-1/chapter-1/article-1/section-230-1/.
  45. Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b).
  46. Cal. Labor Code § 246.5(a)(2).
  47. Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.8(b).
  48. A.B. 2499, Chapter 967, Sections 4–5, repealing Cal. Labor Code § 230, § 230.1.
  49. Molly Weston Williamson, “Getting To Know the Healthy Families Act,” Center for American Progress, September 5, 2023, available https://www.americanprogress.org/article/getting-to-know-the-healthy-families-act/.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Author

Team

Women’s Initiative

The Women’s Initiative develops robust, progressive policies and solutions to ensure all women can participate in the economy and live healthy, productive lives.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.