How the Defense of Marriage Act Harms the Troops and Undermines the U.S. Military
SOURCE: AP/Gregory Bull
See also: Video: How the Defense of Marriage Act Is Harming One Military Couple by Lauren Santa Cruz and Katie Miller
Endnotes and citations are available in the PDF version of this report.
In 2010 President Barack Obama signed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act, creating a path to allowing gay and lesbian service members to serve openly for the first time. Although this was a monumental achievement for our troops and for our country, gay and lesbian service members continue to face discrimination within the U.S. armed services. The Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, is a law that, for the purposes of the federal government, defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman. Despite same-sex marriage now being legal in nine states and the District of Columbia, the law prevents the federal government— and the military as a part of the federal government—from recognizing same-sex marriages. The Defense of Marriage Act governs who can be counted as a spouse in all aspects of federal policy, including enrollment in important military-benefits programs.
The United States has a moral obligation to care for its military members and their families. Congress has passed hundreds of laws intended to improve the quality of life of service members, veterans, and their families, which not only compensates military members for their sacrifices but also enables the armed forces to achieve high levels of mission readiness and effectiveness. Adequate compensation for military members and their families is necessary to the well-being of the entire force and is a critical component of our national security.
The Defense of Marriage Act was enacted before gays and lesbians were permitted to serve openly in the military and before same-sex marriages were legal in the United States. When Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act, it was not confronted with the fact that the law would force the military to deny support and benefits to legally wedded same-sex spouses. But that is the current reality. On average, 70 percent of an active-duty service member’s compensation comes in the form of benefits and allowances. Withholding the portion of these benefits that are intended to care for the spouse of a military member inflicts significant financial burdens on military families headed by same-sex spouses. Denying gay and lesbian service members and their families the benefits that years of experience have shown are essential to the proper functioning of our armed forces is counterproductive to the effort to recruit and retain these service members.
The Defense of Marriage Act neither defends marriage nor contributes to the actual defense of our country. Service members should never be forced to choose between continuing their service to our country and ensuring the financial stability and well-being of their families. In fact, it is our responsibility as Americans to ensure that our military families are rewarded for their many sacrifices—not burdened by additional sacrifices when they return from duty. Unfortunately, the Defense of Marriage Act forces the military to subject a subset of personnel to heavy financial burdens by withholding benefits even as their service remains paramount to the freedom, security, and prosperity of our country. Moreover, the Defense of Marriage Act compromises the efforts of Congress and military leaders to recruit, retain, develop, and honor our men and women in uniform. By preventing the military from recognizing the legal marriages of same-sex military couples, the Defense of Marriage Act contradicts numerous military initiatives and represents an injustice against the brave Americans responsible for defending us all.
Impact of the Defense of Marriage Act on gay and lesbian service members by the numbers
Nearly 100 laws provide a military spouse with support or benefit of some kind.
70 percent of an active-duty service member’s compensation comes in the form of allowances and benefits—separate from base pay, which provides the other 30 percent of compensation.
18 percent to 23 percent: the average increase in Basic Allowance for Housing at the “with dependent” rate.
$417,000: the maximum home loan amount from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for a legally recognized surviving spouse.
$0: the cost of out-of-pocket expenses for a service member with an opposite-sex partner to extend military health insurance and health care to eligible dependents.
$5,615: the average cost a military family headed by a same-sex couple will pay out of pocket to obtain health insurance—because same-sex spouses are not eligible for military health insurance.
Employment and education
27,000: the number of military spouses hired by 129 businesses through the Military Spouse Employment Partnership, a program unavailable to same-sex military spouses.
$18,077: amount of tuition coverage per year that a service member may transfer to a legally recognized spouse under the G.I. Bill.
$987: the monthly allowance for education and job training for legally recognized spouses of deceased service members.
Honoring families of the fallen
$564 to $1,884: amount of additional disability compensation awarded annually if a wounded warrior is supporting a legally recognized spouse.
$1,215: monthly allowance for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation, which goes to the surviving opposite-sex spouse of a service member who died while on active duty.
$8,219: annual income limit that the federal government ensures no surviving military spouse will fall below—if their marriage is legally recognized by the federal government.
Katie Miller is a Special Assistant at the Center for American Progress, where her work focuses on gender and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender issues in the military.
- Video: How the Defense of Marriage Act Is Harming One Military Couple by Lauren Santa Cruz and Katie Miller
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, poverty, Half in Ten Education Fund)
202.741.6285 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Anne Shoup (foreign policy and national security, energy, LGBT issues, health care, gun-violence prevention)
202.481.7146 or email@example.com
Print: Crystal Patterson (immigration)
202.478.6350 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Madeline Meth (women's issues, Legal Progress, higher education)
202.741.6277 or email@example.com
Spanish-language and ethnic media: Tanya Arditi
202.741.6258 or firstname.lastname@example.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or email@example.com
Radio: Chelsea Kiene
202.478.5328 or firstname.lastname@example.org