Building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border would be costly, damaging to the environment, and ineffective.
Yellowstone. The Grand Canyon. Yosemite. A Utah national monument lives up to some of our greatest national parks.
Recent policy developments have spurred investment in conservation, but an executive order signed by President Trump now undermines efforts to unlock economic growth and a better future for America’s land, water, and wildlife.
Modernizing forest policy for the benefit of local economies will require a major shift in how success is viewed and measured.
Uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration’s approach to the U.S.-Mexico relationship has left water allocations in limbo for 35 million Americans living in the West.
The Bureau of Land Management’s planning processes are at risk under the Congressional Review Act.
The anti-democratic procedures of the Congressional Review Act have turned Congress into an auction house, where the bigger a special interest group’s campaign contributions, the faster its targeted environmental rule is overturned.
National parks and public lands should continue to be owned by all Americans. Congress must protect these special places and not allow them to be exploited for private profit.
With the help of President-elect Trump’s Cabinet appointees, Exxon Mobil is seizing power and profit through the incoming administration.
Will President-elect Donald Trump invest in America’s lands, waters, and wildlife, or will he dismantle the nation’s powerful and growing outdoor recreation economy?
The proposed national monument is among the most undeveloped and connected places for wildlife in the West.
Developing clear and effective federal mitigation policies can provide environmental and economic benefits and attract private-sector investment in the conservation of America’s lands, waters, and wildlife.
Like much of America’s infrastructure, many of the country’s estimated two million dams are obsolete, costly, aging, and unsafe.
Credit auctions would restore competition, increase revenues, and cut carbon pollution from the federal coal program.
Anti-government extremism, tensions over control of public lands, and easy access to guns collide in Nevada, with devastating consequences.