An Investment in Our Future
How Federal Home Visiting Funding Provides Critical Support for Parents and Children
SOURCE: AP/Sue Ogrocki
- Endnotes and citations are available in the PDF and Scribd versions.
- Download the report:
- Download introduction & summary:
- Read it in your browser:
This report contains a correction.
See also: Profiles: State and Tribal Grantees’ Innovation and Success in Implementing Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting by the Center for Law and Social Policy and the Center for American Progress
“[MIECHV] is changing the way kids are growing up … and building healthy and successful families.”
— Utah program coordinator
The federal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting, or MIECHV, program has supported high-risk families in communities across the country through intensive home visiting services since 2010. MIECHV provides federal funds to support programs that connect families with trained professionals—often nurses, social workers, or parent educators—who help parents acquire the skills they need to promote their children’s development. The majority of MIECHV funds—75 percent—support evidence-based home visiting services that have been rigorously evaluated and have proven to be effective strategies for improving outcomes for families and for saving public resources over the long term.
Over the past five years, MIECHV grantees have built home visiting systems that reach the most vulnerable children and families in their communities. However, the tremendous efforts state and tribal grantees have put forth on implementation and systems building have not been broadly highlighted. Interviews with 22 states and tribal organizations reveal the breadth of innovation and success across the country as a result of MIECHV funding. (see “Methodology”)
MIECHV was designed to address issues that include maternal and newborn health; child injuries and abuse; neglect or maltreatment and reduction of emergency department visits; school readiness and achievement; crime or domestic violence; family economic self-sufficiency; and the coordination of community resources and supports. States are demonstrating progress toward these benchmarks by focusing their resources on strategic initiatives and targeting the most high-risk populations. Grantees highlighted the following efforts as particular successes in interviews:
Every grantee is expanding evidence-based home visiting services to more vulnerable children and families in high-risk communities. MIECHV provides additional resources to bolster existing services where home visiting was already an established program and create statewide infrastructures to introduce home visiting where it was not available. Using needs assessments, grantees identified the most high-risk populations and are directing resources to expand home visiting within these communities.
Retention of staff and families
To ensure families receive the full benefits of participating in home visiting programs, they must remain engaged throughout the curriculum and complete the appropriate number of visits with their home visitor. Many grantees use MIECHV funds to identify strategies to improve program retention and ensure that families achieve positive outcomes.
Many state and tribal grantees use MIECHV funds to support the establishment of systems within home visiting communities and across services that support children and families. Grantees create processes and relationships to integrate the various home visiting services available, ensuring that families receive the best services to meet their needs. Additionally, grantees are building relationships with other community service agencies in order to provide more effective referrals and integration of the continuum of services.
Systemic training, technical assistance, and professional development
MIECHV funds enable grantees to provide technical assistance and training to support home visiting staff in providing the most effective services possible and ensuring that quality standards are being met. Professional development provided with MIECHV funding strengthens the home visiting workforce and extends its capacity to deliver high-quality services to children and families.
Building data systems
MIECHV legislation requires participating states to collect data that demonstrate improvements on established benchmark areas. Grantees use MIECHV funds to develop data infrastructures in order to gather the required data and report on progress toward the benchmarks. These investments enable grantees to be more efficient in their data collection and analysis and to increase the competencies of the broader home visiting community to use data for program improvement and evaluation.
Many states highlight collaboration facilitated by MIECHV funding as a success of the program. This can be seen at the program level in collaboration across home visiting models; at the state level in which multiple agencies work together to implement the grant; and at the federal level in which grantees work across state lines to identify best practices and provide communities of support.
Centralized intake systems
Many grantees leverage MIECHV funding to develop centralized intake systems—also referred to as coordinated intake systems—which are collaborative approaches to engaging, recruiting, and enrolling families in home visiting across programs and organizations. Centralized intake systems help programs better identify and serve their at-risk populations by connecting families to the home visiting model that will best meet their needs and streamlining the referral process.
Expanded use of evidence-based models and evaluation
Since MIECHV places a high value on evidence-based programs, the grant increases the reach of the most effective home visiting services. Grantees use MIECHV funds to ensure that they implement models with fidelity by incorporating continuous quality improvement, or CQI, and ongoing evaluation into their implementation. Grantees are also using MIECHV to evaluate promising practices and develop an evidence base for new home visiting models.
Innovation and promising practices
As a result of the MIECHV program, grantees achieve a broad range of innovation. States utilize funds to establish many unique and interesting enhancements, programs, and initiatives related to service delivery, systems development, training, incorporation of technology, and more. The design of the grant programs allows states the freedom and flexibility to be creative in how they achieve the results intended by the grant.
Each grantee acknowledges the tremendous value that MIECHV adds to infrastructure for home visiting services. However, the implementation process has not been without challenges. Grantees identify the rapid timeline for development and implementation as a significant challenge, along with the burden of tracking and reporting on the required benchmark data. Finally, the sustainability of the program is of particular concern and has inhibited some grantees from planning for the long term.
Looking to the future
Over the past five years, MIECHV grantees have built home visiting systems that reach some of the most vulnerable children and families in the country. MIECHV provides critical support to home visiting programs across the country; continuing this investment and ensuring its sustainability would allow state and tribal grantees to continue expanding services to new communities and other underserved populations, as well as help sustain the outcomes achieved thus far.
Moving forward, grantees elevate the need for more collaboration and communication among federal, state, and tribal administrators, as well as opportunities for more feedback and information sharing among MIECHV grantees. States are realizing many successes and achievements that could benefit other states that are tackling similar challenges or hoping to implement comparable programs.
In the near future, Congress must reauthorize the MIECHV program at current funding levels to ensure that grantees are able to maintain and increase service capacity and continue to support ongoing systems-building work, professional development, training and technical assistance, and the many successes of MIECHV. Additionally, federal legislators should consider making the MIECHV program permanent to provide sustainable funding for effective policy that produces significant results for the children and families who benefit from high-quality home visiting.
Stephanie Schmit is a Senior Policy Analyst with the Child Care and Early Education team and Legislative Coordinator at the Center for Law and Social Policy. Christina Walker is a Policy Analyst with the Child Care and Early Education team at the Center for Law and Social Policy. Rachel Herzfeldt-Kamprath is a Policy Analyst with the Early Childhood Policy team at the Center for American Progress.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Liz Bartolomeo (poverty, health care)
202.481.8151 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Tom Caiazza (foreign policy, energy and environment, LGBT issues, gun-violence prevention)
202.481.7141 or email@example.com
Print: Allison Preiss (economy, education)
202.478.6331 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Tanya Arditi (immigration, Progress 2050, race issues, demographics, criminal justice, Legal Progress)
202.741.6258 or email@example.com
Print: Chelsea Kiene (women's issues, TalkPoverty.org, faith)
202.478.5328 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Spanish-language and ethnic media: Rafael Medina
202.478.5313 or email@example.com
TV: Rachel Rosen
202.483.2675 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Radio: Sally Tucker
202.481.8103 or email@example.com