Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have taken a large toll on essential Army and Marine Corps equipment. Necessary equipment is being used at as much as nine times the planned rate, abused by harsh environments, and depleted due to losses in combat. The military is taking equipment from non-deployed units and pre-positioned stocks in order to maintain readiness. This limits our military’s ability to respond to contingencies outside of Iraq.
Enhancing military readiness is necessary in order to keep our troops as safe as possible and maintain national security. It is therefore essential that we fully fund the replacement and repair of Army and Marine equipment.
The Center for American Progress released two reports this year detailing policies needed to ensure a full military recovery from operations in Iraq: Army Equipment After Iraq and Marine Corps Equipment After Iraq.
Near-term policies should include:
- Congress fully funding the Army and Marine Corps’ requests for reset funding and guaranteeing a high level of reset funding for every year that the U.S. maintains its presence in Iraq.
- Congress continuing to fund reset for at least two years after deployed forces depart Iraq to assure full resolution of all war-related equipment problems.
- The Department of Defense conducting and submitting to Congress a comprehensive review of new equipment needed for the active and reserve components to recover fully from deployments to Iraq and to meet future commitments at home and abroad.
- The Army and Marine Corps funding its reset programs through the normal budget process and not through supplementals, as has been the case since the beginning of operations in Iraq.
Long-term, the Army policies should include:
- Continuing efforts to reorganize warfighting capabilities around modular, networked brigade combat teams.
- Producing and funding a comprehensive plan for the continuous enhancement of heavy armored vehicles.
- Completely replacing Cold War truck fleet while beginning the development of a successor to the versatile High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (Humvee).
- Accelerating the fielding of new situational awareness and communications systems.
- Working hard to keep all elements of the aviation modernization program on track and recognizing that the timely fielding of new or improved attack, utility, cargo and reconnaissance helicopters is critical to future conventional and counter-insurgency operations.
Long-term, the Marine Corps policies should include:
- Receiving an increase in their share of the Navy budget from 14 percent to 17 percent and their overall share of the defense budget from four percent to five percent unless the defense topline budget is changed.
- Joining the Army in producing and funding a comprehensive plan for the continuous enhancement of heavy armored vehicles.
- Considering the purchase of alternative medium and heavy-lift helicopters to bridge the gap between the time the CH-46E Sea Knight and CH-53E Super Stallion helicopters wear out and the MV-22 Ospreys reach full operational status.
- Funding procurement at a steady rate of $3.0 billion per year (in constant FY 06 dollars).
- Developing a new Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) to replace the Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAV); it is not clear that the service can fill all of its future needs with the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) given the system’s high cost.
The Center for American Progress Action Fund released a memo in November urging the 100th Congress to take steps to restore military readiness in its first 100 days in office by fully funding the replacement and repair of Army and Marine equipment. View the full agenda here:
To get in touch with Lawrence J. Korb, our expert on this topic, please contact:
For TV, Sean Gibbons, Director of Media Strategy 202.682.1611 or firstname.lastname@example.org
For radio, Theo LeCompte, Media Strategy Manager 202.741.6268 or email@example.com
For print, Trevor Kincaid, Deputy Press Secretary 202.741.6273 or firstname.lastname@example.org