Center for American Progress

Supreme Court must see through Mississippi’s fictitious claims
In the News

Supreme Court must see through Mississippi’s fictitious claims

Elyssa Spitzer and Osub Ahmed debunk some of the dubious claims in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Mississippi’s unconstitutional 15-week abortion ban.

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider an abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. When it does, it will hear not only suspect legal arguments on behalf of Mississippi’s plainly unconstitutional 15-week abortion ban designed to overturn Roe v. Wade but also dubious claims.

For example, the state suggests in its briefs that birth control is effectively universally available and free and that women have achieved essentially equal economic security and success. This, the state argues, renders abortion care no longer necessary, so the court should stop recognizing it as a constitutional right.

These claims are false, and it would be devastating if fanciful “facts” provided the justification for upending nearly 50 years of precedent recognizing the right to abortion. The court has adopted specious facts as true before, notably in the context of voting rights, to devastating effect; it must not do so again.

The above excerpt was originally published in The Hill. Click here to view the full article.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

Elyssa Spitzer

Policy Analyst

Osub Ahmed

Associate Director, Women's Health and Rights