Center for American Progress

Rex Tillerson Was a Horrible Secretary of State. Mike Pompeo Could Be Worse.
In the News

Rex Tillerson Was a Horrible Secretary of State. Mike Pompeo Could Be Worse.

Authors James Lamond, Daniel Benaim, and Max Bergmann discuss the dangers of the hyper-personalization of diplomacy—a troubling trend in President Donald Trump's foreign policy.

This transition occurs at a time when the United States and the world are in dire need of a steadying diplomatic hand. The president may conduct a historic sit down with Kim Jong-un. The Iran nuclear deal is hanging on by a thread, and Tillerson was negotiating to save it. Russia appears “highly likely” to have poisoned a former spy on the soil of our NATO ally, the United Kingdom. The United States and another NATO ally, Turkey, are engaged in a military standoff as Syria burns (here, too, Tillerson was conducting talks).

The hope is that Pompeo can re-energize the State Department. The fear is that he will do so by indulging the president’s (and his own) hawkish impulses. For as long as he remains in office, President Trump will represent a force for volatility in world affairs. The country is in need of a secretary of state who can minimize the damage emanating from the Oval Office, maintaining a steadying American presence in the parts of the world not destabilized by the president’s attention.

The above excerpt was originally published in The National Interest. Click here to view the full article.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

James Lamond

Fellow

Daniel Benaim

Senior Fellow

Max Bergmann

Senior Fellow