Center for American Progress

New Clean Vehicle Standards and Investments Improve Public Health, Fight Climate Change, and Build Domestic Supply Chains

New Clean Vehicle Standards and Investments Improve Public Health, Fight Climate Change, and Build Domestic Supply Chains

Testimony Before the House Oversight and Accountability Committee Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs

Shannon Baker-Branstetter, senior director of Domestic Climate and Energy Policy at the Center for American Progress, testified on the clean vehicle standards and federal EV investments, highlighting the consumer, grid, climate, and national security benefits of EVs.

Thank you, Chair Fallon, Ranking Member Bush, and members of the subcommittee. I appreciate the opportunity to appear today to provide testimony on the benefits of electrifying the vehicle fleet and updating greenhouse gas standards for vehicles.

Reducing emissions from the transportation sector is a huge opportunity to improve public health, fight climate change, and build domestic supply chains.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Transportation is the No. 1 source of greenhouse gas emissions, and passenger and heavy-duty vehicles are the largest contributors within transportation. In addition to carbon pollution, heavy-duty vehicles emit or contribute to ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, and air toxics, all of which are especially harmful to children’s developing bodies.1 Fortunately, automakers and governments are investing in cleaner vehicles, and stronger vehicle emission standards can help solidify this progress.

Last December, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized standards to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, which will save thousands of lives, and in April 2023, the EPA proposed new greenhouse gas standards for light- and medium-duty vehicles2 and heavy-duty vehicles3 for model years 2027–2032. The greenhouse gas standards are technology-neutral and can be met through a variety of technologies, including: improved efficiency, conventional hybrids, plug-in hybrids, electric vehicles (EVs), battery, or fuel cell. Because of their lower costs, EVs are an attractive, cost-effective way to comply with these rules, and a likely compliance pathway could result in 67 percent of new light-duty vehicle sales being electric by 2032 and between 25 percent and 50 percent of new heavy-duty vehicles electrifying, depending on the vehicle class.

Both proposed greenhouse gas rules would deliver hundreds of billions of dollars in net benefits, including avoided deaths and hospitalizations and fuel savings. New light-duty vehicle standards from the EPA will cut pollution from light-duty vehicles by more than 56 percent4 in 2030, and EV buyers can expect to save an average of $7,800–$11,800 over the life of the vehicle. The heavy-duty standards would reduce emissions equivalent to eliminating all greenhouse gas emissions from the entire current U.S. transportation sector for a whole year. Heavy-duty vehicle owners can expect to see significant net savings from electrification and recoup any additional upfront costs in fewer than three years for most vehicle classes.5

The world is moving to cleaner fuels and EVs, and the United States can be a leader in policy, technology development, and vehicle sales.

Without strong climate, labor, and industrial policy that positions the United States to be a leader in EV technology and production, the country will lose out to global competitors, especially China, which has been investing heavily in EV technology and manufacturing. The United States is now taking the necessary actions to catch up to the competition and make up for lost time through the combination of strong vehicle standards from the EPA; charging infrastructure investment from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the bipartisan infrastructure law; and the investments from the Inflation Reduction Act to onshore manufacturing and build a robust domestic supply chain.

Inflation Reduction Act and IIJA investments are making EVs more affordable for low- and middle-income households, whether they are buying a new or used vehicle, and are supporting manufacturing and procurement of electric trucks, buses, and charging infrastructure. Through two consumer-facing credits, charging investments, automotive manufacturing investments, and tax incentives for every stage of battery manufacturing, from critical mineral production through processing to assembly, these investments are setting a productive and competitive course for the United States. A few key examples include:

  • The Inflation Reduction Act incentivizes apprenticeships and prevailing wages through the qualifying advanced energy project credit6 (Section 48C) and the alternative fuel vehicle refueling property credit7 (Section 30C) to support new construction jobs that pay well and prepare the American workforce for growth professions.
  • The advanced manufacturing production tax credit8 (Section 45X) supports domestically produced clean energy components, including battery components and critical minerals.
  • The full tax credit for new EVs for consumers (Section 30D)9 is only available for vehicles that: 1) are assembled in North America; 2) have an increasing percentage (40 percent now, 80 percent by 2027) of the critical minerals utilized in battery components that are extracted or processed in the United States or a free trade agreement country or recycled in North America; 3) have the majority of battery components sourced in North America (increasing from 50 percent now to 100 percent in 2028); and 4) contain no battery components or critical minerals from any foreign entity of concern (starting in 2024 and 2025, respectively).
  • The Inflation Reduction Act creates a new 25E tax credit for previously owned clean vehicles. The credit provides up to $4,000 for the purchase of a used clean vehicle. Importantly, the credit can also be transferred, allowing those with lower tax liability to still benefit from the credit.
  • The Inflation Reduction Act creates the new 45W commercial clean vehicle credit. The credit provides up to $7,500 for the purchase of a new clean vehicle under 14,000 pounds or up to $40,000 for vehicles weighing more than 14,000 pounds. The credit can also be monetized by tax-exempt entities.
  • The Inflation Reduction Act authorizes $1.29 billion for the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to purchase zero-emissions delivery vehicles. Another $1.71 billion is authorized to support the purchase, design, and installation of charging and other required infrastructure. In December 2022, the USPS announced plans to deploy 66,000 EVs by 2028.10
  • The Inflation Reduction Act invests $4 billion11 to support the purchase of heavy-duty zero-emissions vehicles, charging infrastructure, and workforce training, including at ports. 12
  • The bipartisan infrastructure law created the Clean School Bus Program at the EPA. The program will provide $5 billion over five years for the replacement of school buses with low- and zero-emissions buses.13
  • The Inflation Reduction Act invests $3 billion to support the manufacture of eligible vehicles and components under the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program. The law also removes the $25 billion cap on ATVM loans. The program provides direct loans for manufacturing facilities that produce light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles, locomotives, and maritime vessels.14
  • The Inflation Reduction Act provides the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office $250 billion in increased loan authority. That brings the office to $387 billion in loan authority to finance innovative clean energy technologies.15
  • The Inflation Reduction Act provides $3 billion through the Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant Program to increase access to mobility that is safe, affordable, and equitable. The program sets aside $1.3 billion for grants to economically disadvantaged or underserved communities.16

EVs provide significant benefits to consumers and public health

Electrifying the vehicle fleet provides many advantages over internal combustion engines, including climate and health benefits; a more resilient and flexible electric grid; a more secure and stable energy supply; and consumer savings on fuel and maintenance.

1.    EVs are better for the climate and public health

Even with the current grid, greenhouse gas emissions from driving an EV are on average 63 percent to 66 percent lower17 than gas-powered vehicles. EVs also have lower emissions than gasoline-powered vehicles in 99 percent of the counties18 in the United States, and this will only further improve as the grid continues to lower its emissions. These emissions savings from driving more than make up for any difference in manufacturing emissions, leading to net savings within 21,000 miles for sedans and 18,000 miles for pickup trucks—a savings rate that will continue to improve as the industry decarbonizes.19 Thanks to the lower pollution from EVs, electrifying transportation and energy generation would avoid 110,00020 premature deaths in the United States between 2020 and 2050.

2.    EVs can enhance grid services and reliability and emergency response

EVs plugged into the grid can act as battery storage for the grid. A National Renewable Energy Laboratory study21 found that EV-managed charging delivered benefits, including decreased emissions, improved reliability, and lower power system costs. The study also found that EV-managed charging could provide thousands of dollars of value per EV every year. One of the potential grid services EVs can provide includes backup power or heating, as demonstrated recently in Texas blackouts and Florida power outages.22 California’s recent clean car standards are expected to put 14 million EVs on the road by 2035; with vehicle-to-grid design and integration, the collective battery capacity23 of those EVs could power all the homes in California for three days.

The increased electric load is marginal compared with the size of the grid, especially when charging is timed to maximize excess capacity. By 2030, the expected increase in EVs will only increase the electric load by 1 percent,24 and if sound charging policies are deployed, no new power plants will be needed. Workplace charging and well-timed home charging can eliminate the need for new power plants25 while also increasing the value and efficiency of solar and wind energy, which can produce excess energy when EVs could charge. Looking further ahead, a fully electrified light-duty fleet would only increase electricity demand by 1 percent per year, which is well below the historical 3.2 percent average annual growth rate for electricity generation over the past 70 years.26

3.    Electrifying transportation has national security benefits

The adoption of EVs displaced 95,890 barrels27 of oil per day in the United States in 2021. This is equivalent to 52 percent28 the amount of oil the United States imported from Russia that year. Why should we continue depending on foreign petrostate dictators for oil when we can generate electricity here at home? Electricity is a more diverse energy source that is homegrown and has greater price stability compared with gasoline and diesel. According to the U.S. Department of Energy,29 “The multiple fuel sources used to generate electricity results in a more secure energy source for the electrified portion of the transportation sector.” Last year, gasoline prices rose 10 times faster than electricity prices.30 The EPA’s proposed standards for light- and medium-duty vehicles are likely to save consumers $1.3 trillion in gasoline costs between 2027 and 2055.

4.    EVs save consumers money, and EV prices are already dropping

Many EVs already save consumers money. Switching to an EV can save the average driver up to $2,600 annually, according to Consumer Reports.31 EVs cost an average of 60 percent less32 to fuel than gas-powered vehicles and 50 percent less33 to maintain. When gas prices are high ($4.31/gallon), EVs save $150 to $21634 per month compared with gas-powered vehicles, and even when gas prices are low, annual EV fueling costs are $470 to $790 less35 compared with a gas-powered vehicle. These cost savings are significant, especially for rural households who spend more of their budget on transportation, drive further distances, and pay more in car maintenance costs. In fact, a Union of Concerned Scientists study36 showed that rural households may save twice as much from switching to an EV compared with their urban counterparts. While some EVs are still slightly more expensive upfront than their gasoline-powered counterparts, Inflation Reduction Act incentives have moved expected EV price parity37 from 2027–2028 to 2023–2025, and monthly savings are realized immediately for vehicles that are financed.

Even without the Inflation Reduction Act’s tax credits for new and used EVs, EV prices have dropped 7.5 percent38 compared with last year. The average transaction price for an EV in April 2023 was $10,096 lower than a year ago, and EV sales are increasing—up 26 percent in April, year over year.39 The new tax credits for EVs assembled in North America provide up to an additional $7,500 off new, nonluxury vehicles, and low- and moderate-income buyers can save $4,000 on used EVs.40 Automakers currently producing vehicles that qualify41 for the new vehicle tax credit include: Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Ford, Jeep, Lincoln, Rivian, Tesla, and Volkswagen.

Good policy can ensure the transition to EVs is successful

The United States cannot afford to be left behind on electrification while the rest of the world transitions to cleaner technologies. To beat out global competition and avoid the worst impacts of climate change, we must move forward with technological and policy solutions that support working Americans and equitable access to EVs to ensure a just transition and a safer, more secure world for ourselves and future generations. The following solutions are essential for a just transition.

1.    Support good jobs and unionization

Between August 16, 2022, and January 31, 2023, EV and battery manufacturing saw 87,131 new jobs,42 and over the past eight years, companies have announced investments totaling more than $120 billion in EV manufacturing, creating approximately 143,000 new jobs.43 The percentage of domestic content in EVs44 increased steadily between 2013 and 2021, with EVs achieving an average of 45 percent domestic content in 2021. But “jobs numbers” alone are not sufficient to declare success. “Good jobs” have career growth potential, family-sustaining wages and benefits, and the free and fair choice to unionize, and many Inflation Reduction Act investments align with supporting good jobs in the construction sector and domestic manufacturing. Pro-labor policies, such as those in the Inflation Reduction Act, should be extended to investments in manufacturing to include mandates or preferences for labor peace agreements and assurances of family-sustaining wages45 and benefits. This will help ensure that manufacturing companies that share the benefits of increased domestic production help realize the promise of good jobs throughout the EV and battery supply chains. It is also incumbent on the industry—from the companies that helped start the auto industry to newer ones—to not push down working standards, but instead partner with unions to lift up the livelihoods of the people who will build America’s EV future.

2.    Support U.S. manufacturing and supply chains to compete with China

President Joe Biden’s investment agenda,46 including the Inflation Reduction Act, the IIJA, and the CHIPS and Science Act, will be critical to building out the manufacturing of parts and components of EVs, as well as to the crucial mineral processing capacity within the United States and its democratic allies and to securing the supply chains that produce and use critical minerals. While China has invested heavily in processing capacity, it does not dominate the global reserves of raw materials, and the opportunity to build out domestic and international supply chains onshoring and “friend-shoring” is enormous. Inflation Reduction Act provisions bolster the competitiveness of U.S. companies by requiring domestic47 EV assembly, incentivizing the manufacturing of core parts and components, and requiring critical mineral sourcing within the United States or with free trade partners,48 which does not include China. China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia are each a “foreign entity of concern,”49 and critical minerals sourced from these countries are excluded50 from EV subsidies and credits. The Inflation Reduction Act directly prioritizes clean energy projects on American soil and reduces U.S. reliance on China51 by bringing component manufacturing and critical mineral supply chains to the United States. As part of the onshoring of new jobs and facilities and friend-shoring of critical mineral processing, the United States must also ensure that it maintains and strengthens high environmental, public health, and labor standards to uphold the livelihoods hard won by unions and to win back the social license to operate mines and processing facilities.

3.    Finalize strong greenhouse gas standards for vehicles

The EPA’s proposed light-duty and heavy-duty vehicle standards are very achievable and provide net benefits. In fact, the standards could be even stronger—to be technology-forcing and to accelerate clean vehicle deployment—but instead, they appear to closely line up with market trends and automaker investments that are already underway. Analysis from the International Council on Clean Transportation52 finds that the Inflation Reduction Act and California’s Advanced Clean Cars II53 standards are likely to drive EV sales to 67 percent by 2032, even without standards from the EPA. Federal standards give the clear signal that market trends will continue and positions the United States as a leader rather than a laggard in developing and deploying EVs. Delaying or weakening these rules and policies supporting a smooth transition to EVs would set back efforts to fight climate change and put the United States at a competitive disadvantage.

4.    Build convenient charging infrastructure

Since 2020, the number of EV chargers available to the public has increased 40 percent,54 and that number will continue to rise as private retail,55 gas stations,56 automakers,57 and local governments58 continue to invest in EV infrastructure. For example, 7-Eleven, the largest convenience store chain in the United States, is adding chargers across the country and Canada and has committed to expand access: “Once the network’s expansion is complete, 7‑Eleven will have one of the largest and most compatible fast-charging networks of any retailer in North America … and make EV charging available to neighborhoods that have, until now, lacked access.”59 Earlier this year, the Biden-Harris administration announced new standards60 for federally supported chargers that boost workforce standards and ensure reliability and ease of use. The bipartisan infrastructure law invests $7.5 billion61 in EV charging focused on highway corridors, while the Inflation Reduction Act tripled the maximum tax credit62 for the installation of charging equipment for businesses.


Climate and worker-forward policy can align with global trends, automaker investments, and consumer demand to put the United States in the lead to accelerate EV production while ensuring good jobs, lowering both consumer costs and pollution, fostering a more resilient economy, and preventing the worst impacts of climate change.

Thank you for the opportunity to be here today. I look forward to your questions.


  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Phase 3: Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis” (Washington: 2023), pp. 368–375, available at
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Proposed Rule: Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  3. Ibid.
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Biden-Harris Administration Proposes Strongest-Ever Pollution Standards for Cars and Trucks to Accelerate Transition to a Clean-Transportation Future,” Press release, April 12, 2023, available at
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Phase 3.”
  6. Legal Information Institute, “26 U.S. Code § 48C – Qualifying advanced energy project credit,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  7. Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plan Communities and Economic Revitalization, “Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit – 26 U.S. Code § 30C,” available at¤-30c/ (last accessed May 2023).
  8. Legal Information Institute. “26 U.S. Code § 45X – Advanced manufacturing production credit,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  9. IRS, “Credits for New Clean Vehicles Purchased in 2023 or After,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  10. U.S. Postal Service, “USPS Intends To Deploy Over 66,000 Electric Vehicles by 2028, Making One of the Largest Electric Vehicle Fleets in the Nation,” Press release, December 20, 2022, available at;
  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Clean Ports Program,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  13. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, “Clean School Bus Program,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  14. U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office, “Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  15. U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office, “Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  16. Legal Information Institute, “23 U.S. Code § 177 – Neighborhood access and equity grant program,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  17. Maxwell Woody and others, “The role of pickup truck electrification in the decarbonization of light-duty vehicles,” Environmental Research Letters 17 (3) (2022), available at
  18. Ibid.
  19. David Reichmuth, “Electric Vehicles are Cleaner than Gasoline— and Getting Better” (Washington: Union of Concerned Scientists, 2020), available at
  20. American Lung Association, “Zeroing in on Healthy Air” (Washington: 2022), available at
  21. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “Aligning Utilities and Electric Vehicles, for the Greater Grid,” January 10, 2022, available at
  22. Ira Boudway, “After Natural Disasters, Electric Vehicles Come to the Rescue,” Bloomberg, November 7, 2022, available at
  23. Max Baumhefner, “How Electric Cars and Trucks Improve Grid Reliability,” Natural Resources Defense Council, September 8, 2022, available at
  24. Hauke Engel and others, “The potential impact of electric vehicles on global energy systems,” McKinsey & Co., August 8, 2018, available at
  25. David L. Chandler, “Minimizing electric vehicles’ impact on the grid,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 15, 2023, available at
  26. Chris Harto, “Blog: Can the Grid Handle EVs? Yes!”, Consumer Reports, May 10, 2023, available at
  27. David Gohlke and others, “Assessment of Light-Duty Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the United States, 2010 – 2021” (Lemont, IL: Argonne National Laboratory, 2022), available at
  28. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): How much petroleum does the United States import and export?”, (last accessed May 2023).
  29. U.S. Department of Energy, “Alternative Fuels Data Center: Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  30. Karin Kirk, “Driving with electricity is much cheaper than with gasoline,” Yale Climate Connections, June 2, 2022, available at
  31. Chris Harto and Quinta Warren, “New Consumer Reports analysis shows rising gas prices ramp up savings for EV owners,” Consumer Reports, Press release, March 10, 2022, available at
  32. Chris Harto, “Electric Vehicle Ownership Costs: Today’s Electric Vehicles Offer Big Savings for Consumers” (Yonkers, NY: Consumer Reports, 2020), available at
  33. Ibid.
  34. Harto and Warren, “New Consumer Reports analysis shows rising gas prices ramp up savings for EV owners.”
  35. Harto, “Electric Vehicle Ownership Costs.”
  36. Daniel Gatti, “Rural Drivers Can Save the Most From Clean Vehicles,” The Equation, December 13, 2018, available at
  37. Peter Slowik and others, “Analyzing the Impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on Electric Vehicle Uptake in the United States” (San Francisco: Energy Innovation: Policy and Technology LLC and Washington: International Council on Clean Transportation, 2023), available at
  38. Camila Domonoske, “Why car prices are still so high — and why they are unlikely to fall anytime soon,” NPR, March 18, 2023, available at
  39. Sean Tucker, “Average New Car Price Holds Steady; Incentives Rising,” Kelley Blue Book, May 10, 2023, available at
  40. IRS, “Used Clean Vehicle Credit,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  41. U.S. Department of Energy, “Federal Tax Credits for Plug-in Electric and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles Purchased in 2023 or After,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  42. The Clean Energy Plan, “Home,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  43. Environmental Defense Fund, “U.S. Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Investments and Jobs: Characterizing the Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act after 6 Months” (Washington: 2023), available at*1ayz5nh*_ga*MTU1MDk1ODM0Ny4xNjc2MDQxODI5*_ga_2B3856Y9QW*MTY3ODgxMTEyNi4yNS4wLjE2Nzg4MTExMjYuNjAuMC4w*_ga_Q5CTTQBJD8*MTY3ODgxMTEyNi4yNS4wLjE2Nzg4MTExMjYuNjAuMC4w.
  44. Gohlke and others, “Assessment of Light-Duty Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the United States, 2010 – 2021.”
  45. Aurelia Glass, David Madland, and Karla Walter, “Prevailing Wages Can Build Good Jobs Into America’s Electric Vehicle Industry” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2022), available at
  46. The White House, “Investing in America,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  47. IRS, “Section 30D New Clean Vehicle Credit,” Federal Register 88 (73) (2023): 23370–23383, available at
  48. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, “Free Trade Agreements,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  49. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law 117-58, Title 42 – SUBCHAPTER II—SUPPLY CHAINS FOR CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (n.d.), 117th Cong., 1st sess. (November 15, 2021), available at
  50. David E. Bond, Matt Solomon, Ian Saccomanno, “US Treasury Department Publishes Proposed Guidance on Clean Vehicle Tax Credits,” White & Case LLP, April 18, 2023, available at
  51. The White House, “FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Clean Energy Projects to Revitalize Energy Communities, Support Coal Workers, and Reduce Reliance on Competitors Like China,” Press release, April 4, 2023, available at
  52. Slowik and others. “Analyzing the Impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on Electric Vehicle Uptake in the United States.”
  53. California Air Resources Board, “Advanced Clean Cars II Regulations: All New Passenger Vehicles Sold in California to be Zero Emissions by 2035,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  54. The White House, “FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Standards and Major Progress for a Made-in-America National Network of Electric Vehicle Chargers,” Press release, February 15, 2023, available at
  55. Dan Avery, “12 Places That Offer EV Charging While You Shop,” CNET, April 19, 2023, available at
  56. Anne LeZotte, “GM and Pilot Company to Build Out Coast-to-Coast EV Fast Charging Network,” Pilot Flying J, available at (last accessed May 2023).
  57. General Motors Co., “GM to Expand Access to EV Charging with More than 40,000 Community-Based Charging Stations and New Smart EV Supply Equipment,” Press release, available at (last accessed May 2023); Ford, “OHMS Sweet OHMS,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  58. U.S. Department of Transportation, “Site Hosts,” available at (last accessed May 2023).
  59. Avery, “12 Places That Offer EV Charging While You Shop.”
  60. The White House, “FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Standards and Major Progress for a Made-in-America National Network of Electric Vehicle Chargers.”
  61. Ibid.
  62. Legal Information Institute. “26 U.S. Code § 30C – Alternative fuel vehicle refueling property credit,” available at (last accessed May 2023).

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.


Shannon Baker-Branstetter

Senior Director, Domestic Climate and Energy Policy


Domestic Climate

It’s time to build a 100 percent clean future, deliver on environmental justice, and empower workers to compete in the global clean energy economy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Just released!

Interactive: Mapping access to abortion by congressional district

Click here