President Barack Obama is being criticized from all sides on his Libyan policy.
Some criticism on these Opinion pages came from two high-level Bush administration appointees, both of whom had a role in bungling the war in Afghanistan and were part of a team that led this country into the needless, senseless invasion and occupation of Iraq. (In fact, these Libyan military operations began almost eight years to the day after “shock and awe” began in Iraq.)
Richard Haas, President George W. Bush’s director of policy planning in the State Department, contends that Obama’s Libyan war is ill advised because it is a strategic distraction. Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense for Donald Rumsfeld, argues that Obama should have acted unilaterally a month ago.
The above excerpt was originally published in Politico. Click here to view the full article.
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.