Frequently Asked Questions: Social Impact Bonds
Part of a Series
Social impact bonds are new and innovative financing mechanisms for social programs in which government agencies pay only for real, measurable social outcomes—after those results have been achieved. These tools effectively invert traditional government financing for preventive social services: In a social impact bond agreement, the government pays for realized outcomes at the conclusion of a contract, rather than paying upfront for programs or activities that may or may not have their anticipated effects.
At the same time, the social impact bond mechanism gives private investors the opportunity to provide operating funds for initiatives that have the potential to prevent or mitigate serious social problems and reduce government costs for later remedial services. These private funders make the initial investments in programs, and they are ultimately repaid, with a modest return, if the initiative is successful and achieves its goals.
It seems straightforward enough until you start to think about how social impact bonds actually work. Who chooses the required outcomes, and how are they set? Who decides if the outcome has, in fact, been achieved? How does the government decide what it will pay for a successful outcome? Who puts the “bond” in social impact bond? How long do these deals last? How can governments address appropriations for social impact bond payouts that may or may not happen? Who are the investors? Where is this tool appropriate to use, and where will it simply not work well?
Social impact bonds are complex tools, and a social impact bond agreement involves the interests of multiple stakeholders, including agencies at different levels of government, the external organizations with whom the government will contract, the service providers whom the external organizations will oversee, the investors who will provide working capital to run the interventions, and, of course, the public at large. All of these groups have similar questions and concerns about social impact bonds, as well as questions unique to their perspectives.
This Frequently Asked Questions guide is intended to address common questions raised by all of these stakeholder groups in plain, straightforward language. It is not, however, a comprehensive guide to designing, negotiating, or implementing a social impact bond agreement. Instead, this document should serve as a tool to direct your thinking as you consider how these new financing tools can be used in your agency or issue area.
This guide is divided into three sections. The first, “Social impact bonds 101,” answers basic questions about the tool, how it works, and who the key players are in any agreement. The second section, “Questions from government,” addresses technical concerns about budgeting, appropriations, and other topics. The third section, “Social impact bonds 201,” addresses higher-level questions about setting outcomes, evaluation methodology, and concerns about the tool’s function in government.
Social impact bonds 101
Questions from government
Social impact bonds 201
This social impact bonds Frequently Asked Questions guide was made possible by the knowledge and input of experts at Social Finance US, Third Sector Capital Partners, Nonprofit Finance Fund, McKinsey & Company, and within the federal government, among other organizations. The authors would like to expressly thank the members of CAP’s Social Impact Bonds Working Group: Beth Bafford, Laura Callanan, Sarah Chiles, Michelle Corson, Annie Donovan, Rick Edwards, Donald Gatlin, Kristin Giantris, Gary Glickman, Steve Goldberg, Jonathan Greenblatt, John Grossman, Kippy Joseph, Tricia Keller, Amy Klement, Margaret Kuhlow, Justina Lai, Noemie Levy, Karen Marangi, George Overholser, Bill Pinakiewicz, Jamal Simmons, Joe Shields, Kathy Stack, Rajan Trivedi, Adlai Wertman, and Mary Ellen Wiggins. Special thanks goes to Laura Callanan and Beth Bafford of McKinsey & Company for organizing and facilitating a presentation on Social Impact Bonds at SOCAP 2012, and to the participants in the presentation’s breakout sessions, who gave valuable feedback and comments on earlier iterations of many of these questions.
The Center for American Progress’s work on social impact bonds is made possible by the generous support of the Rockefeller Foundation.
Kristina Costa is a Research Assistant and Speechwriter at the Center for American Progress. Sonal Shah is a Senior Fellow at the Center and former director of the White House Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation. Sam Ungar is a Special Assistant with the Economic Policy team at the Center.
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.