Center for American Progress

Fact Sheet: Profit Over People: Inside the Commercial Bail Bond Industry Fueling America’s Cash Bail Systems
Fact Sheet

Fact Sheet: Profit Over People: Inside the Commercial Bail Bond Industry Fueling America’s Cash Bail Systems

The commercial bail industry perpetuates unjust cash bail systems and relies on egregious practices to protect its bottom line.

Part of a Series
Photo shows a door with a sign that reads
A sign advertises bail bond services in Los Angeles, California, on August 29, 2018. (Getty/Mario Tama)
Read the full report

Rife with unethical and harmful practices, the commercial bail industry maximizes profits at the expense of safety and justice. After an individual is arrested, the court assigns conditions intended to ensure that they return for their court dates and remain arrest-free. Too often, those conditions include the assignment of cash bail—money an individual must pay to secure their release pretrial. Today, an individual’s ability to afford the cost of bail is the single most important factor in determining if a person is released to the community pretrial or if they await their trial from a jail cell.1

When someone is assigned cash bail, they are given three options to avoid pretrial incarceration: Use their own money to pay bail, use a commercial bail company to secure release, or remain in jail. Using a commercial bail company and remaining incarcerated pretrial can result in lifelong consequences for arrested individuals, their families, and their communities. Reliance on cash bail results in racially and economically unjust outcomes, high rates of pretrial incarceration, increased costs to taxpayers, and negative public safety consequences.

2-tiered cash bail systems

Cash bail produces two-tiered systems of justice and reinforces stark racial disparities. People of color, particularly Black people, receive cash bail assignments at higher rates and greater amounts than similarly situated white people.2 These disparities result in significant racial differences in pretrial detention rates. Furthermore, people with the financial means can pay for their release, while others remain incarcerated because they cannot afford the cost of cash bail. High cash bail amounts are regularly set for even nonviolent arrests,3 yet 80 percent of people involved with the criminal legal system are legally indigent, meaning that they are “unable to afford the necessities of life.”4

Current cash bail practices ignore the fact that most people who are arrested are safe to be in the community pretrial.5 Systems that rely on cash bail produce high rates of unnecessary pretrial incarceration,6 which is known to increase recidivism.7 One study found that assigning cash bail was associated with a 6 percent to 9 percent increase in the rate of recidivism.8 The commercial bail industry further jeopardizes public safety by prioritizing its own profit potential in decision-making, relying on abusive contract terms, and using violent practices to return people to custody and collect payment.

Commercial bail: The for-profit industry behind failing cash bail systems

As one of only two countries in the world that allow commercial bail bonds, the United States allows corporate interests to profit from people who are legally innocent and at risk of being incarcerated pretrial.9 Clients (individuals arrested and charged with a crime) work directly with commercial bail agents, who are responsible for initiating the contractual relationship between the client and the bail company and enforcing bail contracts. In exchange for a nonrefundable premium—a fee typically equal to 10 percent to 15 percent of a cash bail assignment10—a commercial bail agent enters into an agreement with the court to pay an individual’s full cash bail amounts if they fail to appear for their required court dates.11 Today, there are around 15,000 bail bond agents12 in the United States who are responsible for bailing out more than 2 million people each year.13 At times, commercial bail agents hire bounty hunters to find and return to custody clients who miss their court dates. Bounty hunters are also employed to harass clients in efforts to collect overdue payments.

Figure 1

Backing most commercial bail bonds is a small network of insurers. In 2021, there were just six large insurance corporations that underwrote 76 percent of bail bonds written that year:14 Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited; Bankers Financial Corp.; Allegheny Casualty, International Fidelity and Associated Bond; Financial Casualty & Surety Inc.; Lexington National Insurance Corp.; and American Surety Co.15 In 2019, an estimated $15 billion in bail bonds was written.16 The exact profit of the commercial bail industry is difficult to calculate,17 but the industry has been estimated to collect as much as $2.4 billion in profit each year.18

The commercial bail industry prioritizes profit over people

  • Commercial bail companies select clients based on their potential for profit rather than concern for community safety. Bail agents have complete discretion over who they contract with and tend to make their decisions based on one factor: the ability to make a profit. Since many agents see small bonds as “risky and unprofitable,”19 many people with low cash bail amounts who are otherwise safe to be in the community remain incarcerated simply because they cannot afford to pay for their release.
  • Commercial bail companies lack any incentive to ensure that individuals remain crime-free and bear no responsibility if a client commits another crime. In fact, it can be profitable for bail agents if the people they bail out are rearrested. If rearrested, the individual will either be returned to jail—in which case the bail agent retains the 10 percent premium and is relieved of their responsibility of ensuring the individual returns to court20—or the client’s cash bail amount, as well as the agent’s premium fee, will likely increase.21
  • The commercial bail industry traps people in predatory contracts. Bail agents take advantage of vulnerable clients, trapping them in predatory contracts with conditions that “violate common notions of fairness and justice.”22 In addition, innocent co-signers to these contracts—who are predominantly low-income women of color23—are forced to sign away their rights and incur debt to help buy their loved one’s freedom.24 Because of the racial inequities in rates of cash bail assignment and cash bail amounts, people of color, particularly Black people, are more likely to need a commercial bail bond to afford release and are therefore more likely to be trapped in predatory bail contracts.25
  • The commercial bail industry relies on unreasonable fees. Commercial bail contract fees are sometimes so extensive that people end up paying more in fees than their total cash bail assignment. Fees may include recovery fees if a person fails to appear,26 high interest rates on financed premiums, or attorney’s fees.27
  • Some commercial bail agents rely on violence to protect their bottom line. Many bail agents harass clients who miss payments and often hire bounty hunters to find clients who miss their court date.28 Bounty hunters are notorious for employing violent practices that too often result in trauma, injury, and even death.29

The commercial bail industry is predatory, unregulated, and expanding

Since the industry implemented a more formalized lobbying strategy in the 1990s, there has been a significant shift in favor of cash bail, expanding the use of commercial bail bonds across the country. In 1990, 23 percent of pretrial releases used a commercial bail bond, while 40 percent of people were released on recognizance.30 In 2009, releases that used a commercial bail bond more than doubled to account for 49 percent of releases.31 The same year, only 23 percent of people were released on recognizance.32

Figure 2

Legislatures, administrative agencies, and courts alike have failed to adequately regulate the commercial bail industry and protect people from its harms:

  • State legislatures have passed legislation to favor the use of commercial bail bonds. From 2010 to 2013, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and New Jersey (prior to its 2017 bail reform) enacted laws to restrict the charges for which a judge can release an individual on their own recognizance, increasing the likelihood that individuals have a cash bail assignment and need to use a commercial bail bond to secure release.33 Mississippi and Michigan enacted laws in 2007 and 2009, respectively, that allow courts to assign cash bail that can only be paid in the form of a commercial bond as a condition for early release.34 Florida and Texas enacted laws that create onerous and redundant reporting requirements for pretrial services agencies that far exceed the requirements placed on commercial bail companies.35 These laws serve to undermine the effectiveness of pretrial services agencies, which provide an alternative to commercial bail bonds.36
  • The regulatory scheme governing the industry fails to protect clients from industry abuses. There are four main failures with current regulatory structures governing commercial bail bonds. First, 10 states have no licensure requirements for bail agents, while the 37 states that do have only minimal requirements.37 Only 22 states require bounty hunters to be licensed.38 Second, most states have no or few training requirements for bail agents or bounty hunters, which allows people to enter the profession in a matter of days, in some cases.39 Third, oversight of the commercial bail industry is ineffective.40 Fourth, states fail to adequately enforce existing regulations against the industry.
The commercial bail industry is dangerously unregulated. Unprofessional and illegal business practices among bail bondsmen and bail enforcement agents have been found to be pervasive and persistent despite the efforts of the state, which have been insufficient. Connecticut Legislative Program Review & Investigations Committee, "Bail Services In Connecticut,” December 2003, available at https://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/pridata/Studies/Bail_Final_Report.htm.
  • The commercial bail industry is insulated from many mechanisms of judicial accountability. Efforts to hold the industry accountable under criminal and civil law have been largely unsuccessful due to gaps or exceptions in the law.41 Systemic barriers such as lacking financial resources and the stigmatization of being justice-involved limit the ability of people harmed by the industry from initiating lawsuits against it.42 However, recent efforts to enforce consumer protection actions against the industry may signal a new avenue for accountability.43

Recommendations for state-level improvements to cash bail

Abolishing the use of cash bail is the best means to eliminate the role money plays in determining access to fair and equitable pretrial justice and to restore the presumption of innocence in the U.S. criminal legal system. Illinois has provided a statewide model for other states to cease cash bail practices.44 Short of ending cash bail altogether, there are several opportunities for states to better protect residents from the abuses of the commercial bail industry:

  • Eliminate commercial bail: Some states have maintained cash bail practices but eliminated commercial bail companies from the process. Illinois, Wisconsin, and Kentucky banned the commercial bail industry through legislation, while Oregon45 and Massachusetts46 have effectively ended commercial bail practices through state court decisions. Many of these states rely on state-run, rather than commercial, bail systems.47 Rather than paying a premium to a commercial bail company for posting cash bail, an individual pays a 10 percent deposit to the courts. While replacing a commercial bail system helps prevent industry abuses, racially and economically disparate outcomes are likely to persist in state-run cash bail systems.
  • Establish pretrial services systems as an alternative to cash and commercial bail: Pretrial services agencies, currently operational in 300 jurisdictions across the country, provide many services to ensure court appearance, such as monitoring and supplemental resources, including transportation costs and court reminders.48 Investing in pretrial services agencies would allow jurisdictions to lessen their reliance on cash and commercial bail while ensuring high court appearance rates and public safety.
  • Invest in regulatory and enforcement mechanisms: Historically, state agencies with regulatory authority over the commercial bail industry have inadequately enforced claims against the industry. The failure to address abuses has allowed the industry to operate without fear of accountability. Providing increased funding to state government insurance departments and/or commissions for enforcement actions would promote compliance with state regulations and ensure that bad actors can be held accountable.
  • Strengthen consumer protection laws: Current consumer protection laws guard against many of the types of abuses perpetuated by the commercial bail industry, but explicit exemptions and unclear statutory language often prevent these laws from applying to the industry.49 State lawmakers can pass legislation to end explicit exemptions and/or clarify the inapplicability of insurance exemptions to the commercial bail industry where there is uncertainty.

Read more on ending cash bail

What You Need To Know About Ending Cash Bail
 (Getty/Robert Nickelsberg)
Fact Sheet

What You Need To Know About Ending Cash Bail

Cash bail criminalizes poverty, fuels mass incarceration, and disproportionately affects communities of color. States and localities are increasingly pursuing opportunities for reform.

Lea Hunter

Conclusion

Each year, more than 2 million people enter into contracts with commercial bail agents.50 Due to inadequate oversight and regulation of the commercial bail industry, many of those individuals will be subjected to predatory contracts, violence, and other abusive and unethical practices. It is essential for policymakers to implement solutions that limit the role of money in pretrial release decision-making, rein in the commercial bail industry through oversight and regulation, and protect clients from industry abuses.

Endnotes

  1. In 2009, 61 percent of people who were arrested were assigned cash bail. This number is based on 38 percent of releases requiring financial conditions and 34 percent of people being held on bail. Brian A. Reaves, “Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2009 – Statistical Tables” (Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, 2013), available at https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/fdluc09.pdf.
  2. David Arnold, Will Dobbie, and Crystal S. Yang, “Racial Bias in Bail Decisions,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (4) (2018): 1885–1932, available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cyang/files/ady_racialbias.pdf.
  3. In 2009, the median bail amount for felonies was $10,000. Bernadette Rabuy and Daniel Kopf, “Detaining the Poor: How money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time,” Prison Policy Initiative, May 10, 2016, available at https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/incomejails.html.
  4. Cornell Law School, “Indigent,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/indigent (last accessed March 2022).
  5. In 2016, fewer than 5 percent of arrests were for violent crimes. Vera Institute of Justice, “Arrest Trends,” available at https://arresttrends.vera.org/arrests (last accessed March 2022).
  6. Wendy Sawyer and Peter Wagner, “Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2022,” Prison Policy Initiative, March 14, 2022, available at https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2022.html.
  7. Shane Bauer, “Inside the Wild, Shadowy, and Highly Lucrative Bail Industry,” Mother Jones, June 2014, available at https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/bail-bond-prison-industry/; Wendy Sawyer and Emily Widra, “Findings from Harris County: Money bail undermines criminal justice goals,” Prison Policy Initiative, August 24, 2017, available at https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/08/24/bail/.
  8. Arpit Gupta, Christopher Hansman, and Ethan Frechman, “The Heavy Cost of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization,” The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2) (2016): 471–516, available at https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688907.
  9. Color of Change and American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice, “Selling Off Our Freedom: How Insurance Corporations Have Taken Over Our Bail System” (Oakland, CA: 2017), available at https://www.aclu.org/report/selling-our-freedom-how-insurance-corporations-have-taken-over-our-bail-system.
  10. AboutBail, “How Much Does Bail Cost?”, available at https://www.aboutbail.com/pages/bail-cost (last accessed March 2022).
  11. Will Kenton, “Bail Bond,” Investopedia, November 24, 2020, available at https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bail-bond.asp#:~:text=more percent20not percent20uncommon.-,The percent20commercial percent20bail percent20bond percent20system percent20exists percent20only percent20in percent20the percent20United,until percent20the percent20case percent20is percent20resolved.
  12. Color of Change and American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice, “Selling Off Our Freedom: How Insurance Corporations Have Taken Over Our Bail System.”
  13. Joshua Page, Victoria Piehowski, and Joe Soss, “A Debt of Care: Commercial Bail and the Gendered Logic of Criminal Justice Predation,” The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 5 (1) (2019): 150–172, available at https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/5/1/150
  14. Alwyn Scott and Suzanne Barlyn, “U.S. bail-bond insurers spend big to keep defendants paying,” Reuters, March 26, 2021, available at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-insurance-bail-jails-insight/u-s-bail-bond-insurers-spend-big-to-keep-defendants-paying-idUSKBN2BI1BP.
  15. Color of Change and American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice, “Selling Off Our Freedom”; American Civil Liberties Union Smart Justice and Color of Change, “Commitments to Anti-Racism Ring Hollow: Fairfax Financial is the Last Big Insurance Holdout in the Dying Bail Industry” (Oakland, CA: 2021), available at https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/012121-fairfaxbail.pdf.
  16. Scott and Barlyn, “U.S. bail-bond insurers spend big to keep defendants paying.”
  17. Ibid.
  18. Color of Change and American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice, “Selling Off Our Freedom.”
  19. Minneapolis Foundation, “Pretrial Justice: A Report on the Cash Bail System” (Minneapolis: 2019), available at https://www.minneapolisfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Report_Pretrial_Final.pdf.
  20. Ibid., p. 10.
  21. Ryan Nielsen, “What Happens If a Defendant Gets Re-Arrested While Out on Bond?”, Freedom Bail Bonds, August 26, 2020, available at https://freedom-bailbonds.com/what-happens-if-a-defendant-gets-re-arrested-while-out-on-bond/#:~:text=Bail percent20increase percent20or percent20revocation.,elect percent20to percent20revoke percent20bail percent20altogether.
  22. UCLA School of Law Criminal Justice Reform Clinic, “The Devil in the Details: Bail Bond Contracts in California” (Los Angeles: 2017), available at https://static.prisonpolicy.org/scans/UCLA_Devil percent20_in_the_Details.pdf.
  23. Page, Piehowski, and Soss, “A Debt of Care.”
  24. UCLA School of Law Criminal Justice Reform Clinic, “The Devil in the Details: Bail Bond Contracts in California.”
  25. Maryland Office of the Public Defender, “The High Cost of Bail: How Maryland’s Reliance on Money Bail Jails the Poor and Costs the Community Millions” (Baltimore: 2016).
  26. Tracey Kaplan, “San Jose bail agent arrested on suspicion of extortion,” The Mercury News, December 19, 2015, available at https://www.mercurynews.com/2015/12/19/san-jose-bail-agent-arrested-on-suspicion-of-extortion/.
  27. Ariel Nelson and others, “Commercialized (In)justice Litigation Guide: Applying Consumer Laws to Commercial Bail, Prison Retail, and Private Debt Collection” (Boston: National Consumer Law Center, 2020), available at https://www.nclc.org/images/pdf/criminal-justice/WP_Litigation_Guide.pdf.
  28. Ibid.
  29. Ibid.; Stephanie Ingersoll, “Bounty hunters arrested in mistaken identity slaying of Jalen Johnson,” Leaf Chronicle, May 3, 2017, available athttps://www.theleafchronicle.com/story/news/crime/2017/05/03/seven-men-arrested-bail-bondsman-slaying-jalen-johnson/101240354/.
  30. Bauer, “Inside the Wild, Shadowy, and Highly Lucrative Bail Industry.”
  31. Ibid.
  32. Ibid.
  33. Ibid.
  34. Alysia Santo, “When Freedom Isn’t Free,” Washington Monthly, February 22, 2015, available at https://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/02/22/when-freedom-isnt-free/.
  35. National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies, “The Truth About Commercial Bail Bonding in America,” Facts and Positions 1 (1) (2009), available at https://biblioteca.cejamericas.org/bitstream/handle/2015/1107/NAPSA_Facts_and_Positions_2009.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  36. Ibid.
  37. National Conference of State Legislatures, “Bail Bond Agent Licensure,” April 23, 2013, available at https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/bail-bond-agent-licensure.aspx.
  38. National Conference of State Legislatures, “Recovery Agents,” May 2, 2013, available at https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/recovery-agents.aspx.
  39. Gordon, “Corporate Manipulation of Commercial Bail Regulation.”
  40. Color of Change and American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice, “Selling Off Our Freedom.”
  41. Brian Highsmith, “Commercialized (In)justice: Consumer Abuses in the Bail and Corrections Industry” (Boston: National Consumer Law Center, 2019), available at https://www.nclc.org/images/pdf/criminal-justice/report-commercialized-injustice-dec2018.pdf; Gordon, “Corporate Manipulation of Commercial Bail Regulation.”
  42. Fisher, “The History of American Bounty Hunting as a Study in Stunted Legal Growth,” N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change 33 (2) (2009): 199–232.
  43. American Civil Liberties Union, “ACLU’s First Lawsuit Against For-Profit Bail Underwriters that Drive Predatory Industry Ends In Financial Payout for Clients,” October 7, 2022, available at https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/settlement-reached-between-bail-companies-and-montana-couple-terrorized-bounty.
  44. The Institute for Illinois Fiscal Sustainability at the Civic Federation, “Summary of Provisions in Illinois House Bill 3653: Criminal Justice Omnibus Bill,” February 15, 2021, available at https://www.civicfed.org/iifs/blog/summary-provisions-illinois-house-bill-3653-criminal-justice-omnibus-bill.
  45. BountyHunterEdu.org, “The Legal Precedents Outlawing Bounty Hunter and Bail Bondsman Jobs in Oregon,” available at https://www.bountyhunteredu.org/oregon/ (last accessed April 2022).
  46. Fred Contrada, “Bail bondsman are a thing of the past in Massachusetts,” Mass Live, March 25, 2014, available at https://www.masslive.com/news/2014/03/bail_bondsmen_are_a_thing_of_t.html.
  47. Ibid.; BountyHunterEdu.org, “The Legal Precedents Outlawing Bounty Hunter and Bail Bondsman Jobs in Oregon”; State of Nebraska Judicial Branch, “Initial Court Appearances,” available at https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/reporters-guide-nebraska-trial-court-procedures/initial-court-appearances (last accessed April 2022).
  48. Barry Mahoney and others, “Pretrial Services Programs: Responsibilities and Potential” (Washington: National Institute of Justice, 2001), available at https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181939.pdf.
  49. Carolyn Carter, “Consumer Protection in the States: A 50-State Evaluation of Unfair and Deceptive Practices Laws” (Boston: National Consumer Law Center, 2018), available at https://www.nclc.org/images/pdf/udap/udap-report.pdf.
  50. Page, Piehowski, and Soss, “A Debt of Care.”

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Author

Allie Preston

Policy Analyst, Criminal Justice Reform

Explore The Series

A sign attached to a storefront reads

In order to protect their profit potential, companies in the commercial bail industry advance unjust and harmful cash bail practices across the United States. This series examines the commercial bail industry and demonstrates how its corrupt practices threaten community safety, endanger the physical and financial safety of clients and their loved ones, and erode the presumption of innocence in the criminal legal system.

The Center for American Progress will continue to release products that highlight the commercial bail industry’s harmful practices, demonstrate the impacts of those practices— particularly on marginalized groups—and suggest much-needed reforms.

Previous
Next

You Might Also Like