Christian E. Weller on the State of the Economy
Economic data show that this is a recovery for the rich—not a recovery for everyone.
Part of a Series
People are angry at the policy responses to the economy’s subpar performance because policymakers seem to have given up trying to help the millions of Americans who are still struggling. Policymakers in Washington, for example, are now celebrating a bipartisan budget deal that ends extended unemployment benefits for millions of long-term unemployed workers. Observers can breathe easier because this time, radical conservatives did not hold the government’s finances hostage to their demands, and another government shutdown has been avoided. It is, indeed, a very low bar for Americans’ expectations of policymakers if people are satisfied when they do not wreak havoc on government finances and the economy.
But American citizens should not be satisfied and should demand more. All economic measures that matter to the majority of people—job growth, economic growth, productivity growth, poverty reduction, and income growth—have performed worse in this recovery, which started in June 2009, than in previous recoveries of at least equal length. Middle-class families continue to struggle in the wake of the Great Recession and are looking for help from their elected officials.
The current economy only works for those lucky few with high incomes who depend in large measure on corporate profits through dividends and stock market gains for their financial well-being. Income inequality stayed high and increased throughout the recovery. Corporate profits recovered more quickly than in previous recoveries to very high levels.
Policymakers need to focus on building an economy that works for everybody. This will not happen overnight and will require a wide range of comprehensive policies to grow the economy from the middle out. Such policies include investments in education, higher minimum wages, more opportunities to join a union, and better help for people who want to save.
1. Economic growth lags behind previous recoveries. Gross domestic product, or GDP, increased in the third quarter of 2013 at an inflation-adjusted annual rate of 3.6 percent. Domestic consumption increased by an annual rate of 1.4 percent, housing spending substantially grew by 13 percent, while business investment growth slowed to 3.5 percent. Exports increased by 3.7 percent in the first quarter, and government spending was essentially flat with an increase of only 0.4 percent. The economy has now expanded by 10.2 percent from June 2009 to September 2013—its slowest expansion during recoveries of at least equal length. Policymakers need to focus on strengthening key parts of economic growth, particularly investment and exports, with targeted measures that go beyond removing fiscal uncertainty.
2. Improvements to U.S. competitiveness lag behind previous business cycles. Productivity growth, measured as the increase in inflation-adjusted output per hour, is key to increasing living standards. U.S. productivity has risen by 6.4 percent from June 2009 to September 2013, the first 17 quarters of the economic recovery since the end of the Great Recession. This compares to an average of 11.4 percent during all previous recoveries of at least equal length. No previous recovery had lower productivity growth than the current one. Productivity growth is the main driving force for the country’s ability to raise living standards. Weaker productivity growth than in the past will make it harder to build a strong middle class, requiring policymakers’ attention to invest in U.S. competitiveness.
3. The housing market continues to recover from historic lows. New-home sales amounted to an annual rate of 444,000 in October 2013—a 21.6 percent increase from the 365,000 homes sold in October 2012 but well below the historical average of 698,000 homes sold before the Great Recession. The median new-home price in October 2013 was $245,800, down slightly from one year earlier. Existing-home sales were up by 6 percent in October 2013 from one year earlier, and the median price for existing homes was up by 12.8 percent during the same period. Home sales have to go a lot further, given that homeownership in the United States stood at 65.3 percent in the third quarter of 2013, down from 68.2 percent before the recession. The current homeownership rates are similar to those recorded in 1996, well before the most recent housing bubble started. Although the housing-market recovery started later than the wider economic recovery—and started out at a record low—the housing market has lately contributed a much-needed boost to economic progress. As such, there is still plenty of room for the housing market to provide more stimulation to the economy more broadly. The fledgling housing recovery could gain further strength if policymakers support economic growth and job creation at the same time.
4. Moderate labor-market recovery shows less job growth than in previous recoveries. There were 6.2 million more jobs in November 2013 than in June 2009. The private sector added 6.9 million jobs during this period. The loss of nearly 620,000 state and local government jobs explains the difference between the net gain of all jobs and the private-sector gain in this period. Budget cuts reduced the number of teachers, bus drivers, firefighters, and police officers, among others. The total number of jobs has now grown by 4.7 percent during this recovery, compared to an average of 11.6 percent during all prior recoveries of at least equal length. Those looking for jobs still need assistance such as extended unemployment insurance benefits.
5. Employment opportunities grow very slowly for people in their prime earning years. The employed share of the population from ages 25 to 54—which is unaffected by the aging of the overall population—was 75.9 percent in November 2013. This was the same level as in June 2009 and well below the levels since the mid-1980s and before the Great Recession started in 2007. The employed share of the population has on average grown by 3 percentage points at this stage during previous recoveries of at least equal length. Specifically, there has been insufficient job growth to create real economic opportunities for people in the midst of their main earning years when they need those opportunities the most.
6. Employer-sponsored benefits disappear. The share of people with employer-sponsored health insurance dropped from 59.8 percent in 2007 to 54.9 percent in 2012, the most recent year for which data are available. The share of private-sector workers who participated in a retirement plan at work fell to 39.4 percent in 2012, down from 41.5 percent in 2007. Families now have less economic security than in the past due to fewer employment-based benefits, which requires them to have more private savings to make up the difference.
7. Some communities continue to struggle disproportionately from unemployment. The unemployment rate stood at 7 percent in November 2013: The African American unemployment rate was 12.5 percent; the Hispanic unemployment rate was 8.7 percent; and the white unemployment rate was 6.2 percent. Meanwhile, youth unemployment stood at 20.8 percent. The unemployment rate for people without a high school diploma ticked down to 10.8 percent, compared to 7.3 percent for those with a high school degree, 6.4 percent for those with some college education, and 3.4 percent for those with a college degree. Population groups with higher unemployment rates have struggled disproportionately more amid the weak labor market than white workers, older workers, and workers with more education.
8. The rich continue to pull away from most Americans. Incomes of households in the 95th percentile—those with incomes of $191,000 in 2012, the most recent year for which data are available—were more than nine times the incomes of households in the 20th percentile, whose incomes were $20,599. This is the largest gap between the top 5 percent and the bottom 20 percent of households since the U.S. Census Bureau started keeping records in 1967. Median inflation-adjusted household income stood at $51,017 in 2012, its lowest level in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1995. And the poverty rate remains high—at 15 percent in 2012—as the economic slump continues to take a massive toll on the most vulnerable citizens.
9. Corporate profits stay high near pre-crisis peaks. Inflation-adjusted corporate profits were 85 percent larger in September 2013 than in June 2009. The after-tax corporate-profit rate—profits to total assets—stood at 3.2 percent in September 2013, nearing the previous peak after-tax profit rate of 3.3 percent that occurred prior to the Great Recession. Corporate profits recovered quickly during the economic recovery, highlighting the bifurcated nature of the economy.
10. Corporations spend much of their money to keep shareholders happy. From December 2007—when the Great Recession started—to September 2013, nonfinancial corporations spent on average 98 percent of their after-tax profits on dividend payouts and share repurchases. In short, almost all of nonfinancial corporate after-tax profits went to keep shareholders happy during the current business cycle. Nonfinancial corporations also held on average 5.3 percent of all of their assets in cash—the highest average share since the business cycle that ended in December 1969. Nonfinancial corporations spent on average 168.7 percent of their after-tax profits on capital expenditures or investments—by selling other assets and by borrowing. This was the lowest ratio since the business cycle that ended in 1960. U.S. corporations have prioritized keeping shareholders happy and building up cash over investments in structures and equipment.
11. Poverty stays high. The poverty rate remained flat at 15 percent in 2012—the most recent year for which data are available—which is an increase of 0.7 percentage points over the three years of the recovery from 2009 to 2012. The poverty rate has fallen on average by 0.7 percentage points in previous recoveries of at least equal length. Moreover, some population groups suffer from much higher poverty rate than others. The African American poverty rate, for instance, was 27.2 percent; the Hispanic poverty rate was 25.6 percent; while the white poverty rate was 9.7 percent. The poverty rate for children under the age of 18 stood at 21.8 percent. More than one-third of African American children—37.9 percent—lived in poverty in 2012, compared to 33.8 percent of Hispanic children and 12.3 percent of white children.
12. Household debt is still high. Household debt equaled 103.9 percent of after-tax income in September 2013, down from a peak of 129.7 percent in December 2007. A return to debt growth outpacing income growth, which was the case prior to the start of the Great Recession in 2007, from already-high debt levels could eventually slow economic growth again. This would be especially true if interest rates also rise from historically low levels due to a change in the Federal Reserve’s policies. Consumers would have to pay more for their debt and have less money available for consumption or saving.
Christian E. Weller is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and a professor in the Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs at the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Sam Ungar is a Research Assistant at the Center.
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.
Christian E. Weller