Center for American Progress

CAP’s Response to the FTC’s Proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing
Article

CAP’s Response to the FTC’s Proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing

The Center for American Progress submitted comments in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed enforcement policy statement on personalized pricing, urging the commission to go beyond disclosure and establish stronger protections against harmful surveillance pricing.

Read a Column Summarizing CAP's FTC Submission

On September 25, 2026, the Center for American Progress submitted comments in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) request for public comment on its proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized, or surveillance, pricing. The proposed statement addresses the use of consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices based on what a company believes a particular consumer is willing to pay.

CAP welcomes the commission’s recognition that personalized pricing practices can implicate its authority and responsibility to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices. However, the comment argues that disclosure alone will not adequately protect consumers as artificial intelligence makes it cheaper and easier for businesses to analyze large amounts of personal data and tailor prices at an increasingly individual level.

Drawing from CAP’s recent analysis “5 Ways the FTC Can Protect Americans From AI-Fueled Surveillance Pricing,” the comment urges the FTC to pair transparency with stronger substantive protections. These include giving consumers meaningful control over whether their personal information is used for individualized price-setting; distinguishing legitimate dynamic pricing based on market conditions from surveillance pricing based on an individual’s personal information; establishing guardrails around the data and inferences that can be used to set prices; clarifying where consumers reasonably expect prices to be the same for similarly situated consumers; and preserving legitimate loyalty and rewards programs while preventing them from becoming vehicles for broader commercial surveillance.

Click here to read CAP’s comment letter.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

AUTHORS

Megan Shahi

Director, Technology Policy

Zoë Baird

Senior Fellow

Jared Bernstein

Senior Fellow

Team

Technology Policy

Our team envisions a better internet for all Americans, advancing ideas that protect consumers, defend their rights, and promote equitable growth.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.