Introduction and summary
For decades, the United States has been the world’s preeminent superpower, a position driven by its role as an innovation hub in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Through advances in new industries and technologies, U.S. innovation fuels economic growth and creates new jobs that benefit the American workforce.1 This global leadership in innovation has been attributable in part to America’s unparalleled ability to attract rich and diverse talent from all over the world.
Immigrant stories of success and innovation are woven intrinsically into the fabric of American history. For example, Sergey Brin escaped the Soviet Union, co-founded Google, and changed the way the world processed information; Katalin Karikó, an immigrant from Hungary, co-developed the mRNA vaccine technology that helped the United States and the world respond to the COVID-19 pandemic; and Levi Strauss, a Bavarian immigrant, created the quintessentially American blue jeans.2 Several major tech and telecommunications companies are led or founded by immigrants, and immigrants founded or co-founded an estimated 60 percent of the top U.S.-based artificial intelligence (AI) companies.3 Yet this dominance in innovation is being threatened by the Trump administration’s shortsighted anti-immigration policies.
The administration has sought to undermine the legal immigration system to fulfill its anti-immigration agenda, which hurts the U.S. economy and flies in the face of Americans’ growing support for legal immigration.4 These unprecedented actions—including detaining international students for expressing their opinions, revoking visas, attacking higher education institutions, and issuing new travel restrictions—have sent warning signals to prospective international students, researchers, and innovators worldwide that the United States is not a place that welcomes their skills to build their careers and strengthen the American economy.5 The administration’s actions are having negative impacts across the country, including reducing Americans’ ability to access physicians by preventing foreign doctors from coming to the United States; threatening the educational and social benefits and billions in economic contributions that international students bring to the United States each year; and pushing the world’s brightest to seek a future in other countries to study, research, and work.6
These anti-immigration policies exacerbate the Trump administration’s broader attacks on American innovation.7 While the administration makes boastful claims about making America’s economy more powerful, its actions are actually hurting U.S. innovation.8 The administration is making devastating cuts to federal funding for scientific research and development (R&D) and attempting to freeze funding for colleges and universities, rather than prioritizing solutions that spur innovation and prepare American workers for new types of work.9 In addition, the administration has falsely framed its immigration policies as seeking to serve the interests of American workers.10 Overall, through its anti-immigration rhetoric, restrictive policies, and unchecked use of power, along with other anti-worker policies, the Trump administration is weakening America’s long-term competitiveness and jeopardizing jobs and opportunities for American workers.11
This report examines the Trump administration’s actions targeting talented immigrants and the avenues that allow them to work in the United States, underscoring the crucial role that immigrants play in strengthening America’s leadership in innovation. The report explains the harmful consequences of the administration’s anti-immigration actions on America’s global strength in innovation by describing how the United States is ceding its power to attract global talent to other countries, chilling America’s long-standing role as a beacon for current and future innovators, and harming America’s AI leadership. Instead of restrictive, punitive policies that damage America’s reputation and harm the U.S. economy, the country needs the executive branch to work with Congress to pursue smart policies that benefit American workers and create a better, modern legal immigration system for the United States that fosters innovation, incubates new ideas, supports cutting-edge research, and boosts America’s competitive advantage.12
The Trump administration’s actions attacking legal immigration threaten American innovation
Immigrants have made advances for U.S. innovation despite the country’s archaic immigration system, which was last updated 35 years ago.13 However, instead of working with Congress to fix the system’s flaws, the Trump administration has taken extreme steps to restrict legal immigration to the United States, threatening the future of American innovation. These actions are making it harder and less attractive for foreign nationals to come to the United States to study and contribute their work, skills, and ideas to critical industries.
Targeting international students and researchers and restricting new arrivals
The Trump administration is targeting international students and researchers at universities across the country by going after their ability to lawfully study and work in the United States. For example, the U.S. Department of State has revoked more than 6,000 student visas.14 The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also attempted to terminate more than 4,700 Student Exchange and Visitor Information System (SEVIS) records of international students across the country in an effort to end their ability to lawfully study at American universities.15 Many of these students quickly piled up legal victories against the administration, as judges in multiple states put temporary restraining orders in place halting the administration’s actions.16 Amid pressure, the administration reinstated the SEVIS records, effectively restoring the lawful status of thousands of affected students.17
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has also detained multiple international students and researchers across the country for lawfully expressing their opinions.18 These detainees include Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University graduate student researching the relationship between social media and child development, who was detained for simply expressing views in an opinion piece in her college newspaper.19 A 25-year DHS veteran told The Washington Post he had “taken violent drug traffickers into custody with less overt intimidation and haste” than the way Öztürk was arrested.20 Federal Judge William G. Young, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, scathingly rebuked the Trump administration’s unconstitutional actions against noncitizens such as Öztürk, which he found were taken primarily “on account of their First Amendment protected political speech” and sought to “chill the rights to freedom of speech and peacefully to assemble.”21
The Trump administration’s approach is to announce flashy policies that favor the wealthy without lifting a finger to actually fix the broken immigration system.
Furthermore, in the face of the administration’s efforts to step up its indiscriminate mass detention, some immigrants in STEM fields—including a mechanical engineering student at the University of Alabama and a clinical psychology graduate from Harvard University—have opted to leave the country.22 In addition, DHS also detained a Russian scientist working in cancer research at Harvard when she arrived in the country for not declaring to customs that she was carrying frog embryos for her lab’s work, an omission that would normally result in a fine but, in this case, led to the U.S. Department of Justice filing multiple federal criminal charges against her after a judge ordered her release from immigration detention.23 These types of enforcement actions targeting students and researchers without a clear public safety rationale are causing real, pervasive fears among foreigners that they too could be arrested or detained, harming the country’s long-standing reputation as an attractive destination for innovators.24
The Trump administration also implemented new travel restrictions banning people from 12 countries from coming to the United States on visas and partially banning those from seven other countries; and it is reportedly considering adding 36 more countries to this list.25 The administration is also policing the speech of prospective foreign students by requiring applicants for student and exchange visitor visas to make their private social media accounts public so that consular officers can screen their posts, a process that could stifle speech and slow down visa processing without meaningfully enhancing security.26 The impact of these travel and visa restrictions has meant that approximately 1,000 foreign medical residents have been unable to come to the United States, risking an increase in physician shortages in rural areas, which could exacerbate the negative impact on rural hospitals caused by the massive cuts to Medicaid in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.27 These counterproductive actions disregard the contributions that these immigrants can make to the United States as students, researchers, and professionals in their respective fields.
How do international students navigate through the U.S. immigration system?
Immigrants who seek to enter the United States through existing legal channels face a lengthy and uncertain process to translate their skills, education, and work into a durable status.28
Take this example of how America’s imperfect immigration system actually works in practice for international students:29 An international student admitted to an American university to pursue an undergraduate degree focusing on AI has to demonstrate that they intend to return to their home country after graduating to secure a student visa, even if as a teenager they do not know their future plans.30 If they are able to secure a visa, after graduating from a U.S. college or university, to be able to work legally in the United States beyond a short duration, an employer has to apply for them to work via a highly competitive lottery for a limited number of temporary work visas, for which the employer does not have to first rule out that an American worker is available to perform the job.31 But for that same immigrant worker to eventually become a lawful permanent resident after procuring a work visa, the employer then has to demonstrate that no American is available to do that job.32
After that flawed process is complete years after they first entered the United States, if the immigrant worker finally qualifies for an employment-based green card after jumping through multiple hoops, they may still have to wait for many years to obtain a green card because the number of green cards authorized by Congress each year has not been updated since 1990, while the demand for green cards has grown, creating huge backlogs.33
Attacking universities and undermining immigrants’ ability to work legally
Along with targeting foreign nationals who study and work in science, technology, and other innovative industries, the Trump administration is also going after higher education institutions and processes that enable international students to legally study and work in the United States.34 As part of a broader attack on U.S. universities, the administration targeted Harvard University in an unprecedented move that attempted to both end the university’s ability to enroll foreign students—stating that existing students should transfer to another school or leave the country—and suspend the entry of new foreign students.35 These attempted restrictions on Harvard have been halted by a federal judge.36 The administration also issued subpoenas demanding that Harvard turn over data on its international student population, placing the confidential information of thousands of students at risk.37
In another unprecedented act of government overreach, the Trump administration asked nine prominent universities to sign a pledge agreeing to several of its political priorities including capping international student enrollment to no more than 15 percent and agreeing to turn over international student data upon request in exchange for preferential access to federal funds.38 At present, seven of the nine universities declined to sign the compact, with only the University of Texas showing openness to signing it.39
The Trump administration’s recent anti-immigration policies are making it harder to attract and retain highly motivated immigrants.
Additionally, the administration is taking a sledgehammer to long-standing existing avenues for foreign graduates to legally work in the United States using the skills they have acquired at American universities. The new director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has stated his intent to end the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program.40 This program, which has existed in some form since 1947, is one of the few avenues that allows graduating foreign students to remain in the United States legally for a limited time—up to 12 months, and up to 36 months for STEM graduates—to gain further experience and work in their field of study, enabling them to contribute skills acquired at American universities to the U.S. economy.41
OPT is a limited program; it provides no direct path to a work visa or permanent residency, and it can be improved so that employers who hire students on OPT do not get a tax break.42 But without creating an alternative for international students to stay in the United States after graduation, ending the OPT program would make the United States a much less attractive option for talented international future innovators. In the program’s absence, American employers would have few ways to legally hire international graduates who gain skills and knowledge at American universities.43 Instead of ending OPT and weakening the talent pool of U.S.-educated innovators, the Trump administration should work with Congress to pass legislation to prevent corporations from using the program to get a tax break. It should also expand opportunities for foreign students who graduate from American universities with in-demand skills to remain in the United States and contribute to the economy.
Finally, the administration’s attacks have extended to the children of long-term workers, jeopardizing their ability to receive green cards. In August 2025, the Trump administration overturned a 2023 policy that allowed foreign-born children of immigrant parents to preserve their eligibility for permanent residence as dependents on their parents’ approved immigrant visa petitions, even after they turned 21.44 The updated policy guidance from the Trump administration means children who have followed the rules and lived lawfully in the United States will now be at risk of losing their chance to become permanent residents after waiting in line for years.45 These children, who were raised and educated in the United States, are Americans in every sense except for their permanent U.S. immigration status being delayed through no fault of their own. They will now have to qualify for an alternative visa category to temporarily remain here with their families while starting over their green card application processes from scratch, which could take decades; or they will have to make the difficult decision to separate from their families and leave on their own. Doing away with commonsense policies that preserve family unity is unnecessary and cruel while reinforcing the administration’s message that immigrants and their talents are not welcome here.
America needs smarter visa reforms and better protections for American workers, not gimmicks to buy entry into America
Immigrant STEM workers must rely on a handful of temporary visa programs that often do not do enough to protect them from exploitation.46 These programs can also cause American workers to be displaced and result in lower wages for all workers, as unscrupulous employers are incentivized to take advantage of immigrant workers on unstable temporary visas rather than hire Americans.47 Despite long-standing bipartisan concern and reform efforts in Congress to prevent temporary work visa programs such as the H-1B visa from being abused, Congress has not passed meaningful fixes to these visa programs.48 But the Trump administration’s approach is to announce flashy policies that favor the wealthy without lifting a finger to actually fix the broken immigration system.49 Until Congress improves legal avenues to the United States, the flawed H-1B visa remains the primary way for immigrant professionals to legally work in the country.
The exorbitant $100,000 fee for new H-1B petitions is one example of the administration’s incomplete and haphazard approach.50 If the administration really wanted to improve the visa program and make the system function better to benefit workers, it could intentionally target abusive employers so they would be unable to obtain the limited number of annual H-1B visas.51 However, the Trump administration instead chose to announce a flashy new fee for H-1B applications and issue sparse guidance and differing interpretations of how this new fee would be applied, causing confusion for workers on H-1B visas.52 These actions create a chaotic environment for critical fields in the American economy and do nothing to create durable policies to fix the broken immigration system. A blanket fee of $100,000 for all new petitions would render the visa program unaffordable for many responsible employers and prevent its legitimate use.53 For example, the impact of these exorbitant fees could adversely affect physicians with H-1B visas working in often underserved rural areas in states such as Iowa, North Dakota, and West Virginia.54 Universities and schools that use the H-1B visa program to hire talented faculty and teachers expressed deep concern over the fee hike hindering their ability to fill teaching roles in critical STEM fields.55
Another example of how the Trump administration is inappropriately favoring the wealthy is by allowing the rich to buy their way to a green card via the new “gold card” scheme, in which foreign nationals send $1 million in unrestricted funds to the U.S. Department of Commerce.56 This flashy gimmick is no substitute for the administration’s failure to work constructively with Congress to make the legal immigration system better—including by clearing the green card backlog for workers and families waiting in line for years and by making it easier for entrepreneurs and other talented workers who cannot afford the gold card to immigrate legally to the United States.57
Instead of pursuing policies that favor the wealthy at the expense of others, the Trump administration should work with Congress to reform temporary visa programs so they are not abused to harm American workers and exploit visa holders; and it must make it more straightforward for hardworking immigrants to transition from temporary, onerous visas to permanent residency.
The consequences of the Trump administration’s anti-immigration rhetoric and actions
America’s leadership in innovation has long depended on its ability to attract the world’s best and brightest.58 But as other countries move aggressively to recruit global talent, the Trump administration’s recent anti-immigration policies are making it harder to attract and retain highly motivated immigrants, risking the loss of these innovators to international competitors and undermining American innovation and competitiveness.
Competitors are moving to attract global talent
International students contribute to a country’s economy, advance research and innovation, provide a significant source of revenue for universities, and bring new ideas to educational institutions and employers after they graduate.59 Other countries recognize the need to attract and retain such talent. For instance, Canada recently launched its Global Skills Strategy, which features a faster and clearer path for employers to find well-matched immigrant workers.60 One of Canada’s programs, “Path to Canada,” specifically targets international students in the United States who are struggling to find viable visa options to work after graduation.61 In Spain, the University of the Balearic Islands is preparing to build a research institute to recruit American and other nations’ research and innovation talent.62 At the same time, China has launched efforts to recruit scientists and students affected by the Trump administration’s research funding cuts.63 By pushing Chinese scientists away from contributing their talents to the United States, the Trump administration is exacerbating a brain drain phenomenon from the United States that was already occurring.64
Meanwhile, in the United States, the Trump administration’s rhetoric is pushing away students who would otherwise want to study in America.65 Preliminary research estimated that up to 150,000 fewer international students would arrive at U.S. colleges and universities in the fall of 2025.66 This same research estimated that the drop in foreign student enrollment could lead to a loss of an estimated $7 billion and more than 60,000 jobs.67 A September 2025 report found a 22 percent decline in F-1 student visas issued in May 2025 compared with May 2024.68 Furthermore, survey data show prospective international students are reconsidering the United States as an academic destination, threatening nearly $44 billion in economic contributions and more than 378,000 jobs that international students support nationwide.69
Prospective international students are reconsidering the United States as an academic destination, threatening nearly $44 billion in economic contributions and more than 378,000 jobs that international students support nationwide.
International students provide vital financial support to universities and local economies while also helping create jobs by paying for goods and services at college.70 At the same time, because they pay out-of-state tuition and fees and are largely ineligible for federal financial aid, their financial contributions sustain research, teaching, and infrastructure at universities, as well as help subsidize tuition for American students.71
Beyond these economic contributions, international students also enrich campuses and communities with their diverse perspectives, cultures, and experiences, helping foster collaboration and goodwill between the United States and other countries.72 In the classroom, international and American students learn alongside each other, engaging in a dynamic exchange of ideas and perspectives. This interaction allows American students to gain firsthand exposure to different cultures, languages, and perspectives, broadening their understanding of the world.73 International students also help increase the number of American students who pursue science and technology fields.74 Together, this diversity of experiences and viewpoints fosters creativity and drives innovation in key STEM industries. In fact, nearly half of all Ph.D.s and more than one-third of master’s degrees in STEM fields in the United States were awarded to international students in the 2021–22 academic year.75
Yet needless anti-immigration policies have been layered on top of existing problems that define the nation’s outdated system—such as visa caps and backlogs—causing talent to leave after graduation and effectively giving America’s competitors the talent it helped train.76
Trump administration actions will have a chilling effect on immigration to the United States, undermining U.S. competitiveness
America’s competitive edge is also at risk as the Trump administration’s anti-immigration actions send ripples of fear through fields of the economy that depend on highly skilled immigrant workers—many of whom are already here on temporary visas. Earlier in the year, Silicon Valley tech companies expressed concern for the future of their visa holder workers due to changing immigration policies under the Trump administration.77 These concerns were further exacerbated after the Trump administration recently proposed changes to the H-1B visa that prompted panic from current visa holders.78 In fields like AI, where demand for talent is anticipated to grow more than U.S. workers’ availability, the United States risks losing its competitive and innovative advantage to China—America’s chief global competitor.79 Notably, China is increasing its investments in scientific research and is likely already outpacing the United States; countries such as Canada and France are tailoring their immigration policies to attract skilled immigrants; and other countries such as the United Kingdom are offering attractive incentives to attract the next generation of AI students, workers, and entrepreneurs.80
The Trump administration’s anti-immigration approach harms the future of America’s AI leadership
The use of artificial intelligence is rapidly expanding, with demand for workers growing as AI continues to evolve and become integrated across industries, including health care, finance, and manufacturing.81 The Biden-Harris administration underscored the critical need for both AI software talent, which includes machine-learning engineers, software engineers, and research scientists, as well as hardware talent, who work on the physical AI infrastructure, such as data centers and chips.82 To help meet the growing demand for AI talent, President Joe Biden signed the “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence” executive order in 2023.83 This order laid the groundwork to expand immigration pathways in an effort to attract the AI and tech talent that would help position the United States as a global leader in the field.84 The order also included a push for faster visa processing for international students and researchers studying and working in AI, a goal that complemented the Biden administration’s efforts to reduce backlogs in all immigration case processing at USCIS.85
However, when President Donald Trump took office, he revoked President Biden’s previous AI executive order and introduced his own AI strategy, which excludes any mention of highly skilled immigrants and international students who study and train in America and play a vital role in shaping AI in the country.86 Under the Trump administration, USCIS’s case backlog reached its highest level in at least a decade, as the administration has sought to undermine, not strengthen, legal immigration.87 Instead of building on actions that make it easier for international students and researchers to contribute to the AI sector, the Trump administration has made it harder for these immigrants to legally study and work in the United States, a move that undermines the country’s ability to stay competitive in the global AI race.
The United States faces a significant shortage of AI workers.88 Although more American students are graduating with computer science degrees, many have not been trained in the specialized skills to work in AI.89 In response to the shortage of workers with AI experience, businesses are creating upskilling and reskilling programs to help bridge the AI skills gap, and universities are incorporating AI into their curricula to prepare students to work with the technology.90 But without access to a large talent pool of skilled workers to build America’s AI technology and infrastructure, the United States risks losing the AI race.
In addition to training and preparing the American workforce to fill the AI workforce gap, immigrant talent is critical to building and advancing America’s AI workforce and spurring continued innovation. Immigrants have founded or co-founded top U.S. AI companies, and foreign nationals represent nearly half of all AI-related Ph.D. graduates.91 However, U.S. immigration laws make it difficult for AI professionals, including Ph.D. graduates, to stay in the country and enter the American workforce after they graduate; and the Trump administration’s counterproductive actions will likely worsen the problem.92 When top talent is forced to leave, they take their ideas, work ethic, and innovation with them, undermining U.S. leadership in AI.
To maximize the country’s potential at winning the global AI race, the United States must strengthen immigration pathways to retain top global talent while also investing in upskilling American workers to meet the demands of the AI economy.93 Working together, immigrants and American workers will ensure that the United States remains competitive, innovative, and secure in the global AI race.
See also
Conclusion
America needs constructive immigration policies that strengthen our economy and increase our competitive advantage, not the destructive actions of the Trump administration that harm the economy and our position as a global innovation powerhouse. In this fast-moving world, the United States should welcome the brightest minds—not push them to its competitors—to launch the next big breakthroughs that could create millions of jobs. It is counterproductive and economically damaging to create a hostile environment for highly qualified immigrants with the potential and entrepreneurial drive to advance American dominance in research, innovation, and technology.
For America’s economy to reach its full potential, the executive branch should work with Congress to meaningfully fix the nation’s outdated immigration system. The existing statutory framework for legal immigration—which has not been updated since 1990—is incredibly cumbersome for too many people who want to immigrate to the United States for employment; and it is not flexible enough to support the evolving labor needs of the U.S. economy. Fixing the immigration system requires increasing viable ways for the innovators of the future and their families to bring their talents to the United States.94 Enhancing our legal immigration system is a must, just as America needs new policies that strengthen and support working Americans, increase employment prospects of Americans, and improve overall working conditions to ensure a dynamic and secure economic future for the U.S. workforce.
By creating new constructive legal immigration opportunities and increasing investments in domestic education and training, lawmakers will enhance the country’s ability to attract the foreign students, researchers, and entrepreneurs who are currently being driven away while simultaneously investing in the future of the American workforce. These actions will help power the future growth of the American economy and ensure that the United States can remain the global leader in innovation for years to come.
Appendix: Examples of existing legal immigration pathways that affect innovation
There are a limited number of temporary and permanent visa pathways—avenues to stay, work, or study—that are available to immigrants and have an impact on innovation:95
- H-1B visa: The H-1B visa is a temporary work visa available to professionals who have a job offer from a U.S. employer to work in a “specialty occupation.”96 A limited number of new H-1B visas are available each fiscal year, with a congressionally mandated annual cap of 65,000 visas, plus an additional 20,000 visas for those with advanced U.S. degrees.97 In fiscal year 2024, there were nearly 400,000 H-1B applications approved, most of which were renewals.98 For years, the H-1B visa category has been oversubscribed, with demand for these visas far outweighing the supply.99 While it is the primary work visa for immigrant professionals and therefore extensively used by immigrant workers who advance the innovation economy, the H-1B program needs reform due to its misuse by outsourcing firms that have used the program to replace American workers with immigrant workers at substandard wages.100 Furthermore, the restrictive H-1B visa limits professional and entrepreneurship opportunities and provides inappropriate leverage to employers over their employees on these visas.101
- F-1 student visa and Optional Practical Training: The F-1 visa allows international students to study at accredited U.S. academic institutions provided they meet certain requirements, such as maintaining a full course of study and a foreign residence abroad and demonstrating the ability to support themselves financially.102 In 2024, more than 400,000 F-1 visas were issued to foreign nationals, and there were about 1.1 million international students in the United States.103 For several decades, U.S. law has allowed F-1 visa holders to apply for OPT, allowing them to stay and work full time in the United States temporarily and gain practical experience in their chosen area of study for one year after they graduate.104 Students in STEM fields may apply for a 24-month extension of their OPT.105 After their OPT expires, the options for students are limited: For example, they may qualify for another temporary visa, such as an H-1B visa, stay on a student visa and pursue another degree, or return home.106
- J-1 visa: The J-1 exchange visitor visa is for individuals to participate in cultural or other exchange programs, allowing them to work or study in the United States on a temporary basis.107 J-1 options include programs for professors, students, physicians, and research scholars.108 In 2021, the U.S. Department of State launched the Early Career STEM Research Initiative, which connected international researchers with host institutions.109 About 300,000 foreign visitors come to the United States with J-1 visas each year.110 Certain J-1 visa holders, including those who came for graduate medical education or training, must return to their home country for two years when they finish their program, unless they qualify for a waiver.111 This condition is challenging for international medical graduates looking to work in the United States because they are largely unable to serve in the country unless they use another program such as the Conrad 30 that can exempt them from the requirement.112
- Employment-based permanent immigrant visas: U.S. immigration law allows a limited number of individuals to receive lawful permanent residence in the United States—also known as a “green card”—annually based on their education, skills, and other qualifications.113 Only 140,000 permanent visas for immigrant workers are available each fiscal year, and their spouses and minor children are counted against this cap.114 Temporary visas such as the H-1B do not directly lead to permanent resident status, which is a separate and complex process.115 Backlogs for employment-based immigrant visas are lengthy and grew to a massive 1.8 million cases in 2023, with decadelong wait times for individuals from countries with many applicants, such as India and China.116 These green card backlogs prevent immigrant workers from achieving stability through permanent residency, prolonging their temporary statuses and leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by their employers due to their temporary, uncertain visa statuses.