CAP en Español
Small CAP Banner

RELEASE: One Simple Fix Would Dramatically Reduce the Sequester

    PRINT:
  • print icon
  • SHARE:
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • Share on Google+
  • Email icon

Contact: Katie Peters
Phone: 202.741.6285
Email: kpeters@americanprogress.org

Read the report.

Washington, D.C. – Today, the Center for American Progress released a new report urging Congress to reduce the sequester by using the revenue savings from the fiscal cliff deal passed at the end of 2012. The benefits of applying the fiscal cliff ’s deficit reduction to the sequester would flow disproportionately to critical investments such as education, research, and infrastructure. These sectors have borne the brunt of recent budget cuts, but they are exactly where we should be investing to rebuild the economy.

“Budget deficits have fallen dramatically, and part of that is due to the fiscal cliff deal,” said Harry Stein, Associate Director for Fiscal Policy at the Center for American Progress. “Using the fiscal cliff savings to reduce the sequester’s damaging austerity would help get the economy moving, which should be our first priority.”

The sequester is solving a short-term budget problem that no longer exists. Congress passed the sequester in the face of deeply concerning national debt projections, but those projections look much better now. One major reason for that improvement is the fiscal cliff deal. The report’s author, Harry Stein, explains that using the fiscal cliff savings—which amount to $737 billion over 10 years—to reduce the sequester is exactly in line with Congress’s initial intent to replace the sequester with smarter debt reduction.

sequester_fig3

As Stein points out, fixing the sequester to account for the debt reduction in the fiscal cliff deal would lay the foundation for a stable federal budget and a strong economic recovery. Even better, the benefits of applying the fiscal cliff’s deficit reduction to the sequester would flow disproportionatly to critical investments such as education, research, and infrastructure, which are all part of the broad category of nondefense discretionary spending. This disproportionate impact for nondefense discretionary programs is a result of the 2 percent limit on Medicare cuts in the sequester law. Since Medicare is already mostly protected from the nondefense sequester, nondefense discretionary programs benefit most from reducing the sequester.

Read the report: Why One Simple Fix Would Dramatically Reduce the Sequester by Harry Stein

Related reports from CAP:

To speak with an expert on this topic contact Katie Peters at kpeters@americanprogress.org.

###

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, poverty, Half in Ten Education Fund, women's issues)
202.741.6285 or kpeters@americanprogress.org

Print: Tom Caiazza (foreign policy, health care, LGBT issues, gun-violence prevention, the National Security Agency)
202.481.7141 or tcaiazza@americanprogress.org

Print: Chelsea Kiene (energy and environment, Legal Progress, higher education)
202.478.5328 or ckiene@americanprogress.org

Spanish-language and ethnic media: Tanya Arditi
202.741.6258 or tarditi@americanprogress.org

TV: Rachel Rosen
202.483.2675 or rrosen@americanprogress.org

Radio: Chelsea Kiene
202.478.5328 or ckiene@americanprogress.org