Center for American Progress

The Trump Administration Has Made 150 Million American Workers Newly Vulnerable to Workplace Discrimination
Report

The Trump Administration Has Made 150 Million American Workers Newly Vulnerable to Workplace Discrimination

The Trump administration’s efforts to weaken the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission make more than 150 million American workers more susceptible to discrimination in their workplaces.

In this article
A woman walks down a hallway in Orlando, Florida.
A woman walks down a hallway in Orlando, Florida. (Getty/Jeffrey Greenberg)

When someone is fired or not hired because of their race, denied a promotion based on their gender or sexual orientation, or deprived of a needed accommodation for a disability, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is their first line of defense against lawbreaking employers. But recent aggressive anti-civil rights actions by the Trump administration jeopardize Americans’ ability to work free from discrimination and harassment. This issue brief outlines the EEOC’s critical role, the current threats to its work, and what Americans stand to lose.

What does the EEOC do?

Created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC enforces the law’s prohibitions on discrimination in employment1 based on “race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”2 Later, Congress expanded the EEOC’s role to include protecting against discrimination based on age,3 disability,4 pregnancy,5 and genetic information.6 At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that sex discrimination includes discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.7 In addition, the EEOC enforces Americans’ right to workplace accommodations—changes in the way they work to enable them to do their jobs—based on disability8 and pregnancy.9

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

When employers break the law by discriminating against workers, workers can file charges with the EEOC,10 which can investigate,11 seek conciliation,12 file its own lawsuit,13 or authorize claimants to bring suits.14 The EEOC can investigate and act upon systemic discrimination as well as violations against individual workers, allowing the commission to address employerwide discriminatory practices.15 In fiscal year 2024, the EEOC won nearly $700 million for victims of employment discrimination—money that went to workers whose employers violated their rights, helping make them whole while serving as a warning against future employer lawbreaking.16

The EEOC’s enforcement work is complemented by a host of proactive efforts to prevent lawbreaking discrimination. To ensure that workers understand their rights and employers understand their obligations, the EEOC provides detailed guidance to clarify and reinforce the laws it enforces.17 The commission also does extensive education work, from providing plain language materials explaining the law to conducting thousands of trainings each year.18

Who does the EEOC protect?

Essentially, all employees and job seekers, a total of approximately 153 million Americans, benefit from the protections the EEOC provides.19 The Equal Pay Act20—a law requiring equal pay for equal work that the EEOC enforces—covers virtually all employers, while other laws enforced by the EEOC apply to all but the smallest employers.21 Whether they work in the private sector or for the government,22 practically all employees and those applying for jobs23 are protected by the EEOC against illegal employer actions.

While employees writ large benefit from the EEOC, its protections are especially crucial for those whose employers have broken the law. For example, the EEOC alleged that the package delivery company DHL segregated its workforce, giving Black drivers more physically demanding work and placing them on more dangerous routes. The EEOC’s lawsuit resulted in a consent decree granting workers $8.7 million while enjoining DHL against retaliation and segregating employees based on race or racial demographics.24 In another instance, according to the EEOC, for years, a night shift manager of a New England McDonald’s groped, hit, threatened, and otherwise harassed dozens of employees—many of them teenagers. The EEOC sued the franchise owner, resulting in a consent decree paying $1.6 million in lost wages and compensatory damages and barring the harassing manager from entering the restaurant, alongside policy changes and continued monitoring.25 Victories such as these mean direct recovery for tens of thousands of workers each year,26 while promising swift and rigorous enforcement—with significant cash penalties—against lawbreakers and protecting millions of workers against discrimination. The EEOC has recovered more than $10.5 billion since 1996, discouraging employers from breaking the law while putting money back in workers’ pockets.27

What do recent attacks on the EEOC mean for working people?

The Trump administration is rapidly attempting to dismantle and distort the EEOC’s critical work, beginning with illegally firing two EEOC commissioners years before the end of their appointed terms.28 Removing these commissioners was a shot across the bow against the agency’s effectiveness and independence29 and, with them, workers’ antidiscrimination rights.

Following the playbook outlined in the far-right Project 2025,30 the new EEOC leadership has swiftly turned the agency’s mission inside out, with enforcement priorities that transform the shield of civil rights law into a sword against the most vulnerable.31 Instead of protecting workers of color against race-based discrimination,32 the EEOC’s acting chair has said the commission will focus on “rooting out unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination”33—working against, rather than in support of, efforts to pursue racial equity. In the face of increasing anti-immigrant attacks,34 the EEOC will prioritize “protecting American workers from anti-American national origin discrimination”35 rather than guarding immigrant workers against discrimination.36

The new EEOC leadership has swiftly turned the agency’s mission inside out, with enforcement priorities that transform the shield of civil rights law into a sword against the most vulnerable.

Most prominently, following Executive Order 14168,37 the EEOC’s acting chair announced steps to deprive transgender workers of their rights,38 advancing an authoritarian agenda to aggressively police gender boundaries that place transgender people in danger while harming all Americans.39 These attacks include prioritizing “for compliance, investigations, and litigation … defend[ing] the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights, including women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work”40 and seeking rollbacks of policies protecting workers based on gender identity.41

The stakes of this shift are high for workers fighting back when their employers break the law. According to the EEOC, Asher Lucas, a transgender man, was working as a shift manager at a Michigan restaurant when employees subjected him to repeated, escalating transphobic harassment. When he complained, the restaurant fired him, along with coworkers who complained on his behalf.42 In October 2024, the EEOC sued on Lucas’ behalf for discrimination based on his transgender status in violation of the Civil Rights Act.43 On February 24, 2025, specifically citing Executive Order 14168, the EEOC moved to dismiss the case, abandoning Lucas and reversing the commission’s position.44 Transgender workers now must rely on an EEOC actively working against, rather than for them.

Moreover, these early moves are likely only the beginning. Project 2025 argued for the EEOC to “disclaim its regulatory pretensions” and stop issuing guidance, technical assistance, and other clarifying documents45—sentiments the commission’s acting chair has previously echoed.46 EEOC guidance and other documents are critical tools to help workers understand and enforce their rights and employers understand and comply with their obligations, without which antidiscrimination law becomes less clear and less effective. Similarly, Project 2025 called for the elimination of EEOC workforce data collection necessary to understand and remedy discrimination.47

Conclusion

The Trump administration’s attacks on the EEOC are attacks on Americans’ ability to earn a living free from discrimination and harassment. Hollowing out the EEOC while taking a wrecking ball to the rest of the nation’s civil rights infrastructure will unleash discrimination while depriving workers of the power to fight back when their employers break the law. This assault on bedrock civil rights cannot stand.

Endnotes

  1. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 352, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. (July 2, 1964), section 705, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-4, available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg241.pdf#page=1.
  2. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 352, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. (July 2, 1964), codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg241.pdf#page=1.
  3. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Public Law 202, 90th Cong., 1st sess. (December 15, 1967), section 7, codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 626, available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-81/pdf/STATUTE-81-Pg602.pdf.
  4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 336, 101st Cong., 2nd sess. (July 26, 1990), section 107, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 12117, available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-104/pdf/STATUTE-104-Pg327.pdf.
  5. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Public Law 555, 95th Cong., 2nd sess. (October 31, 1978), available at  https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-92/pdf/STATUTE-92-Pg2076.pdf.
  6. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Public Law 233, 110th Cong., 2nd sess. (May 21, 2008), section 201 et seq., available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-110publ233/pdf/PLAW-110publ233.pdf.
  7. Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 590 U.S. 644 (June 15, 2020), available at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf; Sharita Gruberg, “Beyond Bostock: The Future of LGBTQ Civil Rights” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2020), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/beyond-bostock-future-lgbtq-civil-rights/.
  8. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 12112 – Discrimination,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12112 (last accessed February 2025).
  9. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000gg–1 – Nondiscrimination with regard to reasonable accommodations related to pregnancy,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000gg-1 (last accessed February 2025).
  10. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5 – Enforcement provisions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e-5 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 12117 – Enforcement,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12117 (last accessed February 2025) (applying 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 to the Americans with Disabilities Act); Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 626 – Recordkeeping, investigation, and enforcement,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/626 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000ff–6 – Remedies and enforcement,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000ff-6 (last accessed February 2025) (applying 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act); 42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-2(a), available at https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter21G&edition=prelim (last accessed February 2025) (applying 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 to the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act). The key exception is the Equal Pay Act, which does not require filing with the EEOC before bringing a lawsuit. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “How to File a Charge of Employment Discrimination,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/how-file-charge-employment-discrimination (last accessed February 2025).
  11. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5 – Enforcement provisions”; Investigative authority, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15, available at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1601/subpart-B/subject-group-ECFR74867ad5be87d47/section-1601.15(last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “What You Can Expect After You File a Charge,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/what-you-can-expect-after-you-file-charge (last accessed February 2025).
  12. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5 – Enforcement provisions”; Conciliation: Procedure and authority, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24, available at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1601/subpart-B/subject-group-ECFR80bfe8ca3a5538b/section-1601.24 (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “What You Should Know: The EEOC, Conciliation, and Litigation,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/what-you-should-know-eeoc-conciliation-and-litigation (last accessed February 2025).
  13. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5 – Enforcement provisions”; Civil actions by the Commission, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.27, available at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1601/subpart-B/subject-group-ECFR69236f603c54424/section-1601.27 (last accessed February 2025).
  14. Claimants can request a “right to sue” notice, which enables them to bring a private lawsuit under laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Notice of right to sue: Procedure and authority, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.28, available at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1601/subpart-B/subject-group-ECFR69236f603c54424/section-1601.28 (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Filing a Lawsuit,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/filing-lawsuit (last accessed February 2025).
  15. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report” (Washington: 2025), pp. 6, 40–41, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-01/24-126_EEOC_2024_APR_508_1.16.25_508.pdf.
  16. Ibid., p. 11.
  17. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Guidance,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc-guidance#:~:text=The%20EEOC’s%20guidance%20provides%20the,law%2C%20and%20other%20legal%20sources (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Guidance (by Subject Area),” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/guidance-subject-area (last accessed February 2025).
  18. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report,” p. 14.
  19. This number includes those counted as “employed” and as “unemployed” as of January 2025 but excludes both incorporated and unincorporated self-employed workers. Author’s calculations based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age,” available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Table A-9. Selected employment indicators,” available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t09.htm (last accessed February 2025).
  20. The Equal Pay Act, which is a part of the Fair Labor Standards Act, applies to private sector employers regardless of size. Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S. Code § 206 – Minimum wage,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/206 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 203 – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/203 (last accessed February 2025).
  21. Other than the Equal Pay Act, federal antidiscrimination laws generally apply to employers with at least 15 employees. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 12111 – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12111 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000gg – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000gg (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000ff – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000ff (last accessed February 2025) (applying the definition of employer from Title VII to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act). The Age Discrimination in Employment Act applies to private sector employers with at least 20 employees. Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 630 – Definitions,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/630 (last accessed February 2025).
  22. Subject to narrow exceptions, state and local government employers with at least 15 employees are subject to most federal antidiscrimination and accommodation laws. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e – Definitions”; Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000gg – Definitions”; Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 12111 – Definitions.” The Age Discrimination in Employment Act applies to state and local government employers regardless of size, as does the Equal Pay Act. Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 630 – Definitions”; U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Coverage of State and Local Governments,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/coverage-state-and-local-governments (last accessed February 2025). Among other safeguards, federal employees are protected under dedicated laws prohibiting discrimination in federal employment enforced by the EEOC. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e – Definitions”; Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 791 – Employment of individuals with disabilities,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/791 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “29 U.S.C. § 794a – Remedies and attorney fees,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/794a (last accessed February 2025).
  23. Job applicants are protected against discrimination in hiring by employers covered under laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 – Unlawful employment practices,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e-2 (last accessed February 2025); Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 12112 – Discrimination.” Applicants for most federal jobs are also protected against discrimination in hiring by laws enforced by the EEOC. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 – Employment by Federal Government,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e-16 (last accessed February 2025).
  24. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report,” p. 41.
  25. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Major New England McDonald’s Owner/Operator to Pay $1,600,000 to Settle EEOC Class Harassment and Retaliation Suit,” Press release, June 30, 2022, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/major-new-england-mcdonalds-owneroperator-pay-1600000-settle-eeoc-class-harassment-and; Daniel Wiessner, “McDonald’s franchise settles agencies’ sexual harassment case for $1.6 mln,” Reuters, July 1, 2022, available at https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/mcdonalds-franchise-settles-agencies-sexual-harassment-case-16-mln-2022-07-01/.
  26. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report,” p. 11;  U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “2023 Annual Performance Report” (Washington: 2024), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/2023-annual-performance-report; U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “2022 Annual Performance Report (APR)” (Washington: 2023), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/2022-annual-performance-report-apr.
  27. This number is likely a significant undercount because it does not include recovery for federal workers. Author’s calculations based on U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Table E1c, Charge Receipts and Resolutions by Type (All Statutes) FY 1997 – FY 2023,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/Table%20E1c.%20Charge%20Receipts%20and%20Resolutions%20by%20Type%20%28All%20Statues%29%2C%20FY%201997%20-%20FY%202023.csv (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Table L1. Litigation Statistics FY 1997 – FY 2023,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/Table%20L1.%20Litigation%20Statistics%20FY%201997%20-%20FY%202023_0.csv (last accessed February 2025); U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report,” p. 11.
  28. Alexandra Olson and Claire Savage, “Trump fires two Democratic commissioners of agency that enforces civil rights laws in the workplace,” AP News, January 29, 2025, available at https://apnews.com/article/trump-eeoc-commissioners-firings-crackdown-civil-rights-c48b973cb32bad97e9da9e354ba627db.
  29. EEOC commissioners are appointed to overlapping five-year terms to preserve the agency’s independence and ensure their work continues across changes in administration. Legal Information Institute, “42 U.S.C. § 2000e–4 – Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,” available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e-4 (last accessed February 2025).
  30. Mariam Rashid and William Roberts, “Project 2025’s Distortion of Civil Rights Law Threatens Americans with Legalized Discrimination,” Center for American Progress, October 31, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025s-distortion-of-civil-rights-law-threatens-americans-with-legalized-discrimination/; Paul Dans and Steven Groves, eds., Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), pp. 586–587, available at https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf.
  31. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “President Appoints Andrea R. Lucas EEOC Acting Chair,” Press release, January 21, 2025, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/president-appoints-andrea-r-lucas-eeoc-acting-chair.
  32. Sam Fulwood III, “Confronting the Racial Pay Gap,” Center for American Progress, March 9, 2016, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/confronting-the-racial-pay-gap/.
  33. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “President Appoints Andrea R. Lucas EEOC Acting Chair.”
  34. Tom Jawetz, “Recent Anti-Immigrant State Laws Break New Grounds of Illegality,” Center for American Progress, July 22, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/recent-anti-immigrant-state-laws-break-new-grounds-of-illegality/.
  35. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “President Appoints Andrea R. Lucas EEOC Acting Chair.” Lucas reenforced this position in a second press release. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Acting Chair Vows to Protect American Workers from Anti-American Bias,” Press release, February 19, 2025, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-acting-chair-vows-protect-american-workers-anti-american-bias.
  36. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Acting Chair Vows to Protect American Workers from Anti-American Bias.” For more on the EEOC’s role in combating anti-immigrant discrimination, see Zefitret Abera Molla, “Improving Language Access in the U.S. Asylum System” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2023), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/improving-language-access-in-the-u-s-asylum-system/.
  37. U.S. Federal Register, “Executive Order 14168: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” (January 20, 2025), available at https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02090.pdf.
  38. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC’s Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace,” Press release, January 28, 2025, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/removing-gender-ideology-and-restoring-eeocs-role-protecting-women-workplace.
  39. Cait Smith, “The Far-Right Campaign To Regulate Gender Harms All Americans,” Center for American Progress, October 31, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-far-right-campaign-to-regulate-gender-harms-all-americans/.
  40. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC’s Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace.”
  41. Ibid. As a commissioner, Lucas opposed the harassment guidance. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Commissioner Andrea R. Lucas’s Statement On EEOC Enforcement Guidance On Harassment In The Workplace,” available at https://www.eeoc.gov/commissioner-andrea-r-lucass-statement-eeoc-enforcement-guidance-harassment-workplace (last accessed February 2025).
  42. EEOC v. Brik Enterprises, civil complaint, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 2:24-cv-12817 (October 25, 2024), available at https://www.law360.com/dockets/download/671b9ed789599f0458488dad?doc_url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.mied.uscourts.gov%2Fdoc1%2F097113906304&label=Case+Filing; U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Sues Culver’s for Discriminating Against Transgender Employee and Retaliating Against Him and His Co-Workers,” Press release, October 25, 2024, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-sues-culvers-discriminating-against-transgender-employee-and-retaliating-against-him; Donald Padgett, “Lawsuit claims Culver’s fast-food chain retaliated against trans manager and workers who reported transphobia,” Advocate, October 28, 2024, available at https://www.advocate.com/news/culvers-lawsuit-transphobia.
  43. Ibid.
  44. EEOC v. Brik Enterprises, motion to dismiss, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 2:24-cv-12817 (February 24, 2025), available at https://www.law360.com/dockets/download/67bc6eaa7c1ce99a165a284a?doc_url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.mied.uscourts.gov%2Fdoc1%2F097114090859&label=Case+Filing.
  45. Dans and Groves, eds., Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 586.
  46. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Commissioner Andrea R. Lucas’s Statement On EEOC Enforcement Guidance On Harassment In The Workplace.”
  47. Dans and Groves, eds., Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 582; Rashid and Roberts, “Project 2025’s Distortion of Civil Rights Law Threatens Americans with Legalized Discrimination.”

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Author

Team

Women’s Initiative

The Women’s Initiative develops robust, progressive policies and solutions to ensure all women can participate in the economy and live healthy, productive lives.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.