Center for American Progress

State Examples of the Hidden Cost of a Failing Child Care System
Fact Sheet

State Examples of the Hidden Cost of a Failing Child Care System

This fact sheet provides state-by-state examples of the financial cost of choosing between a career and full-time caregiving.

Hallway walls of a preschool are decorated with examples of the alphabet and protected with chalkboards, February 2012. (AP/Rogelio V. Solis)
Hallway walls of a preschool are decorated with examples of the alphabet and protected with chalkboards, February 2012. (AP/Rogelio V. Solis)

See also: Interactive: The Hidden Cost of a Failing Child Care System

The current child care system is failing families. Sixty-five percent of children have all available parents in the workforce, making access to child care an economic necessity. Yet the annual cost for two children in center-based care reaches nearly $18,000. Many families are left to choose between putting a large percentage of their income toward child care, finding cheaper—and potentially unlicensed and unregulated—care, or leaving the workforce to be a full-time caregiver. The high cost of child care is well-documented. However, the cost born by parents who leave the workforce is less understood. The Center for American Progress developed a tool to highlight how families are affected economically when a parent leaves the workforce to become a full-time caregiver. When parents leave the workforce, they often assume that they are losing their annual wage. The reality is that when lost wage growth and lost retirement assets are taken into account, time out of the workforce costs much more than just an annual wage.

This calculator shows total financial impact, including lost retirement assets and benefits, lost wage growth, and lost wages for the years that someone spends out of the workforce.

The tables below show how much income a typical worker who takes time out of the workforce for five years might lose. The tables also include the average cost of center-based care for two kids as a percentage of the median income in each state to illustrate the difficult choice that families face. Families forced to leave the workforce often end up paying much more than the annual cost of child care in the long run. Without resources to pay for child care at the beginning of their careers, however, parents have few options.

It is worth noting that in reality, most families are not paying upward of 80 percent of their income on child care but instead are choosing cheaper, potentially unregulated care. With no good options available, it is easy to see why some parents feel forced out of the workforce. However, these results demonstrate that leaving the workforce to be a full-time caregiver can have equally, if not more, significant economic impacts on families in the long term.



Jessica Troe is the Policy and Outreach Coordinator for the Early Childhood Policy team at the Center for American Progress. Alex Rowell is a Research Assistant for the Economic Policy team at the Center. Michael Madowitz is an Economist for the Economic Policy team at the Center. Katie Hamm is the Senior Director for the Early Childhood Policy team at the Center.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.


Jessica Troe

Policy and Outreach Coordinator

Alex Rowell

Policy Analyst

Michael Madowitz


Katie Hamm

Vice President, Early Childhood Policy

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Just released!

Interactive: Mapping access to abortion by congressional district

Click here