Politics: The Assault on Reason
Politics: The Assault on Reason
American public discourse is increasingly "vulnerable to the kind of rope-a-dope strategies that Exxon Mobil and their brethren have been employing for decades now," argues Al Gore.
|MAY 21, 2007||by Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, and Matt Corley
Contact Us | Tell-a-Friend | Archives | Mobile
The Assault On Reason
American public discourse is increasingly “vulnerable to the kind of rope-a-dope strategies that Exxon Mobil and their brethren have been employing for decades now,” argues Al Gore. For example, a recent survey of 21 nations found that Americans are “among the least anxious” about global warming, “even though their nation is the top source of greenhouse gases.” In a ranking of 34 countries, the United States ranks near the bottom in the public acceptance of Charles Darwin’s mainstream theory of evolution. Nearly half of the public still believes that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, despite unequivocal refutations of that claim. In his new book, The Assault on Reason, which will be released tomorrow, Gore explains “why logic and reason and the best evidence available and the scientific discoveries do not have more force in changing the way we all think about the reality we are now facing.” He sharply criticizes the television media for covering trivial excess and politicians for alienating the public, many of whom believe “that no one in power listens to or cares what they think.” American democracy “is in danger of being hollowed out,” writes Gore. “In order to reclaim our birthright, we Americans must resolve to repair the systemic decay of the public forum.”
THE ‘WELL-AMUSED AUDIENCE’: Americans watch television for an average of four hours and 35 minutes each day, which is 90 minutes more than the average in the rest of the world. But much of this viewing time is devoted to coverage of “serial obsessions,” such as the Michael Jackson trial and the Laci Peterson tragedy. Gore warns that the “well-informed citizenry” is in danger of becoming the “well-amused audience.” Only one in four Americans can name more than one of the First Amendment freedoms, but more than half can name at least two members of the Simpsons cartoon family. On Aug. 17, 2006, a federal judge in Michigan issued “a sweeping rebuke of the once-secret domestic-surveillance effort the White House authorized following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.” The ruling was “a significant blow to Mr. Bush’s attempts to expand presidential powers.” Yet on that day, the evening news programs on all three television networks devoted significantly more airtime to the JonBenet Ramsey case. According to an analysis by The Progress Report, in the most egregious instance, NBC devoted 15 times more airtime to the JonBenet story. Similarly, on March 2, The Progress Report found that MSNBC and Fox News devoted more coverage to Anna Nicole Smith — three weeks after her death on Feb. 8 — than they did to the multiple developments involving the neglect and deplorable conditions at Walter Reed military hospital. Fox News’s John Gibson, who offered continuous coverage of Smith’s death, attacked reporters who were ignoring the story to focus on the Iraq war as “snobs.” Even bodies such as the U.S. Senate “don’t feel that what they say on the floor of the Senate really matters that much…because the news media seldom report on Senate speeches anymore,” notes Gore. Both ABC and CBS even ignored former deputy attorney general James B. Comeys recent Senate testimony of what NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams May 15 “called a rare glimpse of a high-level, late-night power struggle over the National Security Agency’s warrantless domestic wiretapping program.”
BARRING CITIZEN VOICES: “In the world of television, the massive flows of information are largely in only one direction, which makes it virtually impossible for individuals to take part in what passes for a national conversation,” writes Gore in The Assault on Reason. Ordinary citizens are now trying to purchase short ads to express their views on television. For example, in 2004, MoveOn.org attempted to buy an ad for the Super Bowl broadcast “to express opposition to Bush’s economic policy, which was then being debated by Congress. CBS told MoveOn that ‘issue advocacy’ was not permissible. Then, CBS, having refused the MoveOn ad, began running advertisements by the White House in favor of the president’s controversial proposal. So MoveOn complained, and the White House ad was temporarily removed.” Yet as Gore notes, the Bush administration then complained, and CBS reinstated the White House ad but still refused to air the MoveOn ad. More recently, CBS fired Iraq war veteran Gen. John Batiste as a consultant after he appeared in a VoteVets ad criticizing the Iraq war. A CBS spokeswoman argued that the network’s consultants are barred from engaging in “advocacy.” Yet it continues to employ Brookings Institute scholar Michael O’Hanlon — who has advocated on-air in favor of Bush’s escalation — and Nicolle Wallace, a former White House communications aide and staffer for Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) presidential campaign who has repeatedly aired pro-Bush administration and pro-McCain positions.
RIGHT WING ATTACKS GORE AS A ‘BOOB’: Right-wing pundits have already gone after Gore and The Assault on Reason, lobbing personal attacks rather than reasoned critiques. Macsmind.com, a blog which provides “conservative commentary,” called Gore an “uninformed and downright ignorant boob.” EconoPundit.com said that Gore’s book “has the same level of economic sophistication as pre-WWII arguments about Jewish bankers causing WWI.” The conservative American Thinker magazine argues that Gore must have had a ghostwriter, but admittedly couldn’t find any proof.
SAVE THE INTERNET: Whereas television often suppresses public debate, Gore believes that the Internet encourages it. He writes that it “has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. It is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge … It’s a platform, in other words, for reason.” While the majority of the major television networks ignored Comey’s testimony, blogs continue to cover it. Online watchdogs are holding the media accountable for responsible reporting. Presidential candidates are increasing their presence on the web, with several candidates allowing users to interact with each and give feedback to the campaigns. Ordinary citizens are able to submit questions to candidates during presidential debates. But as Gore warns, there is still just a “very small number of broadband network operators” who have an “an economic incentive to extend their control over the physical infrastructure of the network to leverage control of Internet content. If they went about it in the wrong way, these companies could institute changes that have the effect of limiting the free flow of information over the Internet in a number of troubling ways.” Help Save the Internet by telling Congress to preserve net neutrality here.
“Stanford University is supporting a shareholder resolution calling on ExxonMobil to do a better job of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”
CALIFORNIA: Trade unions are providing hope and steady employment for former gang members.
MICHIGAN: The state is seeing its worst financial situation “in decades.”
IMMIGRATION: Report indicates that the renewed vigor of hate groups in America is “[e]nergized by the rancorous national debate on illegal immigration.”
THINK PROGRESS: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) threatens mystery “resolution” to match “no confidence” vote for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
FITNESS FOR THE OCCASION: Activists attempt to prevent the University of Massachusetts from giving an honorary degree to President Bush’s former chief of staff Andrew Card.
LIBERAL OASIS: Fox News’s Chris Wallace misrepresents former Deputy Attorney General James Comey’s testimony.
MY TWO SENSE: Tell LendingTree.com not to support CNN host Glenn Beck’s racist and bigoted views.
“And I think having a personal relationship makes that, quite frankly, much easier always to deliver bad news.”
QUESTION: Do you recall a time when you (were) in there and said, “Mr. President, we can’t do this?”
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.