Center for American Progress

One Year Later, the TCJA Fails to Live Up to Its Proponents’ Promises

One Year Later, the TCJA Fails to Live Up to Its Proponents’ Promises

President Trump’s tax bill did not reform the tax code, has not benefited American workers, and increased the deficit by $1.9 trillion.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 02: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan looks on as President Donald Trump speaks about tax reform legislation in the Cabinet Room at the White House, November 2, 2017 in Washington, DC. On Thursday, Republican lawmakers unveiled their plans for a massive rewrite of the U.S. tax code. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
House Speaker Paul Ryan looks on as President Donald Trump discusses tax reform legislation, November 2017. (Getty/Drew Angerer)

This issue brief contains a correction.

On December 20, 2017, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate passed a new tax law, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).1 Since the fall of 2017, the legislation, which provides huge tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, has been consistently unpopular with voters.2 Its proponents, however, frequently pushed claims and promises that ranged from aggressive puffery to outright lies. A year after the law’s passage, the major promises made by the TCJA’s proponents have been exposed as hollow.3 Here is the reality of the TCJA’s impact thus far.

Tax cuts primarily benefit the wealthy

Promise: “Any reductions we have in upper-income taxes will be offset by less deductions, so there will be no absolute tax cut for the upper class.” – Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, November 20164

Reality: The TCJA showered massive tax cuts on the richest Americans. The highest-earning 1 percent can expect tax cuts averaging more than $51,000 in 2018 alone—more than what the median American worker makes in a year.5 Even when considering the tax cuts as a percentage of income, the benefits for the richest far exceed those for the middle class. (see Figure 1) American voters have overwhelmingly recognized the tax bill as primarily a giveaway to the wealthy. President Donald Trump essentially admitted as much when he floated the idea of a 10 percent tax cut for the middle class only weeks before the 2018 midterm elections.6 The Administration has since dropped the idea.7

The law’s bonanza for the rich comes in the form of several tax cuts. It doubled the estate tax exemption to $22.4 million for a couple—giving heirs to multimillion-dollar estates a windfall of tax cuts of up to $4.5 million per estate. Massive tax cuts for the owners of pass-through businesses and corporations translated into further tax breaks for the rich. The top 1 percent—who own nearly 40 percent of the country’s wealth, largely in the form of stock and other equity—receive 61 percent of the tax benefits from the reduction in the pass-through rate.8 The tax law even provides giveaways to wealthy people in foreign countries, since foreigners own 35 percent of U.S. corporate stock.9 This year alone, foreign investors will receive a $47 billion tax windfall as a result of the TCJA.10

Existing employment and wage trends persist as corporate profits skyrocket

Promise: “This huge tax cut … will be rocket fuel for our economy. … The biggest winners from this transformation will be everyday families, from all backgrounds, from all walks of life, and our great companies, which will produce the jobs. They are going to produce jobs like you’ve never seen before.” – President Trump, December 201711

Reality: The TCJA has not produced any economic miracles. Despite massive federal borrowing, job creation continues at the same rate as it did before Congress passed the lax law.12 Figure 2 illustrates how the unemployment rate has continued its decadelong decline since peaking in 2009, suggesting that the TCJA’s employment effects are, at best, minimal. Gross domestic product (GDP) growth has been strong in 2018—owing partly to significant increases in federal government spending—but analysts do not expect this pace of expansion to continue much longer.13

More importantly, the economy’s overall growth has not translated into gains for workers. Real wages have barely budged, continuing a pattern that goes back to 1980 in which paychecks have barely kept pace with the rising costs of living.14 As of October 2018, rank-and-file, or production nonsupervisory, workers saw less than a 0.5 percent year-over-year increase in real median hourly earnings—a rate of wage growth slower than what occurred from 2013 to 2016. (see Figure 3) There are systemic reasons for this wage stagnation, such as the erosion of bargaining power, but the TCJA did nothing to address them.15 As Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) put it, “there’s no evidence whatsoever that the money’s been massively poured back into the American worker.”16

After-tax corporate profits—which were already at record highs before the tax bill—soared following the law’s passage, increasing more than 19 percent since the third quarter of 2017.17 Former chief economic adviser Gary Cohn and other proponents of the bill argued that corporations would invest their windfall in their workers —but that has not happened.18 Shortly after the tax bill’s passage, many large corporations, including some that had lobbied heavily for the tax bill, attributed year-end bonuses or other worker benefits to the bill’s passage.19 But there is little reason to believe that the tax bill led to these bonuses or that they signaled an economywide trend.20 Indeed, only 4 percent of firms credited bonuses or other worker benefits to the tax bill, constituting a tiny fraction of their overall payroll.21 Since the tax bill’s passage, bonuses for private sector workers have only increased by $0.02 per hour.22 Most importantly, real wages, the true test of whether workers are getting ahead, grew very slowly.23

Federal deficit soars as corporate tax receipts plummet

Promise: “I not only don’t think it will increase the deficit, I think it will be beyond revenue neutral. In other words, I think it will produce more than enough to fill that gap.” – Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, December 201724

Reality: Every credible analysis predicted that the TCJA would considerably increase federal deficits and the debt.25 The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the law would result in $1.9 trillion of additional debt over the next 10 years, excluding interest, and that the budget deficit would exceed $1 trillion in 2020 and every year thereafter.26 This directly contradicts the promises of revenue-neutral tax reform and deficit reduction outlined in President Trump’s budget for fiscal year 2018.27 Deficits are not inherently harmful, but timing and purpose matter. The decision to implement an unpaid-for, long-term tax cut for the wealthy and corporations several years into an economic recovery was unwise. The resulting rising debt offers congressional leaders a convenient excuse to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.28

The budget shortfall results partially from cuts to the corporate tax rate. Corporate tax revenues fell more than 30 percent in fiscal year 2018, with corporations paying $92 billion less in taxes than the year before.29 When measuring based on what corporate tax revenues would have been under pre-TCJA law, the drop is even larger—$119 billion, or 37 percent, for fiscal year 2018.30

Low repatriation rate of offshore corporate profits

Promise: “Over $4 [trillion], but close to $5 trillion, will be brought back into our country. This is money that would never, ever be seen again by the workers and the people of our country.” – President Trump, August 201831

Reality: The TCJA provided a windfall for large multinational corporations that have hoarded profits offshore for decades to avoid U.S. taxes. Under the new law, these companies must now pay tax on about $2.6 trillion of pre-TCJA offshore profits regardless of whether those profits are returned to the United States.32 But the one-time repatriation tax is dramatically lower than even the new lower rate for new corporate profits, and the companies have up to eight years to pay. Proponents of the legislation argued that companies would bring back trillions of dollars to invest in the United States. But in the first six months of 2018, corporations moved only about a third of the cash and other liquid investments that they are believed to hold offshore—and in any event, far less than the $4 trillion to $5 trillion that President Trump claimed.33

TCJA proponents should have known better. When Congress enacted a tax holiday in 2004 for offshore corporate profits, the tax cut failed to produce any of the promised economic benefits and resulted in significantly reduced federal revenues.34 The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation found that a large portion of the profits that were repatriated during the holiday would have been repatriated anyway and taxed at the normal rate.35 Moreover, instead of investing in workers or boosting investments, corporations funneled nearly all of their tax holiday repatriation dollars into shareholder payouts.36 More broadly, the notion that tax cuts will motivate corporations to bring money back into the country is flawed.37 In reality, repatriation usually amounts to an accounting change—rather than an operational change—for these corporations as they shift money on the books from a subsidiary to the parent company. On paper, this technical change appears as a decrease in overseas investments but does not necessarily reveal actual corporate behavior. Moreover, prior to the TCJA’s passage, corporations were awash in cash and had access to plenty of low-cost financing, making it even less likely that an enormous cut in the corporate tax rate would change their investment behavior.

Corporations use profits for buybacks, not capital investment

Promise: “More assets like machines let workers produce more, and when workers can produce more, businesses can afford to pay their workers more.” – Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Kevin Hassett, October 201738

Reality: Instead of investing more or increasing wages, corporations have largely spent their tax windfalls on stock buybacks. S&P 500 companies spent $194 billion on buybacks during the third quarter of 2018, and buybacks are expected to top a record $1 trillion by the end of 2018.39 Meanwhile, there is no sign of an investment boom. After two strong but hardly exceptional quarters, nonresidential fixed investment slumped badly in the third quarter of this year, increasing by a measly 2.5 percent annualized rate.40 Sen. Rubio recently wrote about the implications of this corporate decision-making: “When a corporation uses its profits to buy back stock, it is actively deciding that returning capital to shareholders is a better activity for business than investing in the company’s product or workforce.”41

The TCJA adds new complexities and loopholes to the tax code

Promise: “So yes, we are throwing out the special-interest loopholes that riddle the code.” – House Speaker Paul Ryan, October 201742

“Our plan will enable Americans to file their taxes on a form so straightforward it would fit on a postcard.” – House Speaker Ryan, August 201743

Reality: On several levels, the TCJA represents a missed opportunity to simplify and reform the tax code. For individuals, House Speaker Ryan’s promised postcard did not materialize. The IRS did produce a new 1040 form with fewer lines—but there is a catch:44 Filers claiming certain deductions, such as for student loan interest, will be forced to use additional worksheets. Meanwhile, the hurried and partisan process of the bill’s passage resulted in several new and continued loopholes.45 For example, the wealthy continue to benefit from stepped-up basis—where gains in asset values are exempted from income taxes when passed to heirs—and have a whole new way to avoid taxes through the TCJA’s new deduction for pass-through businesses.46 Certain industries, such as private equity, oil and gas, and real estate developers, maintained and, in some cases, expanded their ability to use special interest tax breaks.47

The TCJA failed to meet its proponents’ promises to the American people, but it lives up to lobbyists’ and special interests’ wildest dreams. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY) told the press, “My donors are basically saying, ‘Get it done or don’t ever call me again.’”48 Congressional Republicans did indeed get it done by giving their donors huge tax cuts; those donors rewarded them by using some of their new tax savings for political contributions to help re-elect the bill’s supporters.49 Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) admitted that this would be the case when he told a report that “financial contributions” would stop if congressional Republicans did not pass a tax bill.50 Donors did not get all of the windfall, however—several members of Congress also benefited considerably. According to their financial disclosures, some members on tax-writing committees could see tax cuts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars due to changes in pass-through provisions.51

Despite the current strength of the macroeconomy, the fiscal damage52 from the TCJA is already extensive. The 116th Congress should pursue real tax reform that eliminates the law’s costly and ineffective provisions and instead prioritizes a fairer tax code that benefits workers rather than corporations and the wealthy.

Andrew Schwartz is a policy analyst of Economic Policy at the Center for American Progress. Galen Hendricks is a special assistant for Economic Policy at the Center.


  1. Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018, Public Law 97, 115th Cong., 1st sess. (December 22, 2017), available at
  2. RealClear Politics, “Trump, Republicans’ Tax Reform Law,” available at (last accessed December 2018); Harry Enten, “The GOP Tax Cuts Are Even More Unpopular Than Past Tax Hikes,” FiveThirtyEight, November 29, 2017, available at
  3. Paul Ryan, “Tax reform has improved American lives in just six months,” CNBC, June 20, 2018, available at–commentary.html.
  4. Jeanne Sahadi, “’No absolute tax cut’ for the rich, says Trump’s Treasury pick,” CNN, November 30, 2016, available at
  5. Tax Policy Center, “Distributional Analysis of the Conference Agreement for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (2017), available at; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Usual Weekly Earnings of Wage and Salary Workers Third Quarter 2018 (U.S. Department of Labor, 2018), available at
  6. Christina Wilkie, “Trump repeats his dubious pledge to introduce a 10% middle-class tax cut before the midterm elections,” CNBC, October 22, 2018, available at
  7. Laura Davison, “Mnuchin Backs off Trump’s Promise of 10% Middle-Class Tax Cut,” Bloomberg, December 18 2018, available at
  8. Chuck Marr, “JCT Highlights Pass-through Deduction’s Tilt Toward the Top,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, April 24, 2018, available at; Matt Bruenig, “Wealth Inequality Is Higher than Ever,” Jacobin, October 1 2017, available at
  9. Steven M. Rosenthal, “Slashing Corporate Taxes: Foreign Investors are Surprise Winners,” Tax Notes, October 23, 2017, available at
  10. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, “Tax Cuts 2.0 Resources” (2018), available at
  11. The White House, “Remarks by President Trump on Tax Reform,” October 11, 2017, available at
  12. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “All Employees: Total Private Industries (USPRIV),” available at (last accessed December 2018).
  13. Benjamin Fearnow, “U.S. Economy Has ‘Peaked’ and Will Slow Down, Economists Say, Despite Trump’s Projections,” Newsweek, October 28, 2018, available at; John Melloy, “Goldman Sachs believes the US economy will slow to a crawl next year,” CNBC, November 19, 2018, available at
  14. Lawrence Mishel, Elise Gould, and Josh Bivens, “Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts” (Washington: Economic Policy Institute, 2015) available at
  15. The Economist, “If wages are to rise, workers need more bargaining power,” May 31, 2018, available at
  16. The Economist, “Marco Rubio offers his Trump-crazed party a glint of hope,” April 26, 2018, available at
  17. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “Corporate Profits After Tax with Inventory Valuation Adjustment (IVA) and Capital Consumption Adjustment (CCAdj),” available at (last accessed December 2018).
  18. Jim Puzzanghera and Don Lee, “Republicans say corporate tax cuts will boost workers’ wages, but CEOs might have other plans,” Los Angeles Times, November 25, 2017, available at
  19. Landon Thomas Jr., “Companies Are Handing Out Bonuses Thanks to the Tax Law. Is It a Publicity Stunt?”, The New York Times, January 3, 2018, available at
  20. Philip Rucker, “Companies that tie announcements to tax bill earn goodwill with Trump,” The Washington Post, December 22, 2017, available at
  21. Michelle Hanlon, Jeffrey L. Hoopes, and Joel Slemrod, “Tax Reform Made Me Do It!”. Working Paper 25283 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018), available at
  22. Lawrence Mishel, “Bonuses are up $0.02 since the GOP tax cuts passed,” Economic Policy Institute, September 18, 2018, available at
  23. Daniella Zessoules and Michael Madowitz, “Workers’ Wages Remain Stagnant Despite Gains to Top Earners,” Center for American Progress, August 9, 2018, available at
  24. Bruce Schreiner, “McConnell: Tax bill won’t add to nation’s debt woes,” Associated Press, December 2, 2017, available at
  25. Barry Blom, “CBO’s Projections of Deficits and Debt for the 2018–2028 Period,” Congressional Budget Office, April 19, 2018, available at; U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation, “Macroeconomic Analysis Of The Conference Agreement For H.R. 1, The ‘Tax Cuts And Jobs Act,’” December 22, 2017, available at; Benjamin R. Page and others, “Macroeconomic Analysis of the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act” (Washington: Tax Policy Center, 2017), available at
  26. Niv Elis, “GOP tax law will add $1.9 trillion to debt: CBO,” The Hill, April 9, 2018, available at; Jeff Stein, “Deficit to top $1 trillion per year by 2020, CBO says,” The Washington Post, April 9, 2018, available at
  27. Office of Management and Budget, “A New Foundation for American Greatness, Fiscal Year 2018” (2017),
  28. Nathaniel Weixel, “Ryan eyes push for ‘entitlement reform’ in 2018,” The Hill, December 6, 2017, available at; Steven T. Dennis, “McConnell Blames Entitlements, Not GOP, for Rising Deficits,” Bloomberg, October 16, 2018, available at
  29. Seth Hanlon, Alan Cohen, and Sara Estep, “Rising Deficits, Falling Revenues: The Fiscal Damage Caused by the New Republican Tax Law” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2018), available at
  30. Ibid.
  31. The White House, “Remarks by President Trump Before Dinner with Business Leaders,” August 8, 2018, available at
  32. David Morgan, “Corporations may dodge billions in U.S. taxes through new loophole: experts,” Reuters, January 11, 2018, available at
  33. Theo Francis, “Lessons From the Tax Overhaul, a Year In,” The Wall Street Journal, December 2, 2018, available at
  34. Alex Tausanovitch and Liz Kennedy, “How Corporate Donors Get Their Tax Breaks and 5 Ways to Fight Back,” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2017), available at
  35. Letter from Thomas A. Barthold to Orrin Hatch, June 6, 2014, available at
  36. Dhammika Dharmapala, C. Fritz Foley, and Kristin J. Forbes, “Watch What I Do, Not What I Say: The Unintended Consequences of the Homeland Investment Act.” Working Paper 15023 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009), available at
  37. Paul Krugman, “The Tax Cut and the Balance of Payments (Wonkish),” The New York Times, November 14, 2018, available at
  38. Rebecca Savransky, “Trump economic adviser appears surprised by CEO tax proposal response,” The Hill, November 15, 2017, available at; Sam Fleming, “White House says lower corporate tax will lift wages,” Financial Times, October 16, 2017, available at
  39. Alex Veiga,”Betting on themselves: Share buybacks hit record high in 3Q,” Associated Press, November 23, 2018, available at; Jamie Condliffe, “The Stock Market’s Next $1 Trillion Milestone: Buybacks,” The New York Times, August 6, 2018, available at
  40. Bureau of Economic Analysis, “Gross Domestic Product, Third Quarter 2018 (Second Estimate), Corporate Profits, Third Quarter 2018 (Preliminary Estimate),” Press release, available at
  41. Marco Rubio, “America Needs to Restore Dignity of Work,” The Atlantic, December 13, 2018, available at
  42. Speaker Paul Ryan Press Office, “Full Text: Speaker Ryan’s Address on Tax Reform at Heritage Foundation,” Press release, October 17, 2017, available at
  43. Speaker Paul Ryan Press Office, “File Your Taxes on a Form the Size of a Postcard,” Press release, August 8, 2017, available at
  44. Jim Tankersley, “The New Tax Form Is Postcard-Size, but More Complicated Than Ever,” The New York Times, June 25, 2018, available at
  45. Alexandra Thornton, “Broken Promises: More Special Interest Breaks and Loopholes Under the New Tax Law,” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2018), available at
  46. Alexandra Thornton, “11 Ways the Wealthy and Corporations Will Game the New Tax Law” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2018), available at
  47. Ibid; David Blackmon, “The Final Trump Tax Bill: A Clear Net Positive For U.S. Oil And Gas,” Forbes, December 21, 2017, available at
  48. Cristina Marcos, “GOB lawmaker: Donors are pushing me to get tax reform done,” The Hill, November 7, 2017, available at
  49. Thomas B. Edsall, “After Citizens United, a Vicious Cycle of Corruption,” The New York Times, December 6, 2018, available at
  50. Rebecca Savransky, “Graham: ‘Financial contributions will stop’ if GOP doesn’t pass tax reform,” The Hill, November 9, 2017, available at
  51. Center for American Progress Action Fund, “Memorandum: New analysis shows that many Members of Congress cut their own taxes at their constituents’ expense,” April 10, 2018, available at
  52. Hanlon, Cohen, and Estep, “Rising Deficits, Falling Revenues.”

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.


Andrew Schwartz

Senior Policy Analyst

Galen Hendricks

Research Associate