Center for American Progress

Clean Drinking Water for Millions of People at Risk as Trump Administration Targets National Monuments
Report

Clean Drinking Water for Millions of People at Risk as Trump Administration Targets National Monuments

New analysis highlights the extensive risk to U.S. rivers, streams, and drinking water supplies posed by the Trump administration’s threats to eliminate protected national monuments.

In this article
A river and trees in fog
The East Branch of the Penobscot River in the fog at Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, August 19, 2021. (Getty/Shawn Patrick Ouellette/Portland Press Herald)

Since 1906, U.S. presidents have protected millions of acres of public lands and waters through the establishment of national monuments, from the California Coastal National Monument to what is now Acadia National Park in Maine.1 National monuments not only shield important ecosystems, cultural resources, and recreation hubs from threats such as drilling and mining but also provide essential services to communities across the country.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

A new analysis finds that 31 national monuments designated since the Clinton administration and now potentially under threat from the Trump administration safeguard the supply of clean drinking water for more than 13 million Americans.2 Additionally, 83 percent of the miles of rivers and streams passing through these public lands are uniquely protected by their national monument status, meaning they have no other substantial form of conservation protection. Yet today, the Trump administration’s threats to eliminate national monument protections in the name of expanding drilling and mining across U.S. public lands put these clean waters directly at risk from development and pollution.3

Threats to national monuments

During his first term, President Donald Trump removed huge swaths of two national monuments—eliminating 85 percent of Bears Ears and nearly half of Grand Staircase-Escalante in the largest reversal of U.S. land monument protections in history.4 Those monuments were later restored by President Joe Biden,5 but when Trump took office again in 2025, his Department of the Interior drafted a strategic plan that called for the agency to “assess and right-size monuments,” hinting at additional future rollbacks.6 In February 2025, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum signed an order to “review and, as appropriate, revise” certain public lands protections, including national monuments.7 Press reports from April subsequently indicated that the Interior Department was considering cutting protections for at least six national monuments,8 and a May 2025 Department of Justice memo confirmed that the White House was exploring the legality of revoking national monument protections.9 Most recently, President Trump announced his nominee to direct the Bureau of Land Management: Steve Pearce, a former congressman with a record of opposing national monuments and voting to curtail Antiquities Act authorities.10

These threats to national monuments are consistent with a pattern of attacks to public lands in recent months, including the defeated proposal to sell off public lands in the Big Beautiful Bill11 and ongoing actions by the Trump administration to eliminate or weaken protections on more than 175 million acres of public lands.12 Already, President Trump has taken action to remove protections for vast ocean areas within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument,13 and conservation supporters are concerned that additional national monuments could be next on the chopping block.14

National monuments protect uniquely valuable lands and waters from future mining, drilling, and other destructive development, with land managers tasked with prioritizing conservation of important resources. Removing protections for these areas jeopardizes their cultural, historical, and ecological significance. In many cases, national monuments also provide vital access to nature and outdoor recreation opportunities for communities that are considered “nature-deprived.”15

By protecting natural lands from development and associated pollution, national monument protections also help ensure clean water continues to flow through local rivers and streams, supporting aquatic ecosystems and downstream drinking water users. Removing those protections could put rivers, streams, and other drinking water sources at risk, exposing these waters to potential contamination from drilling and mining operations16 and potentially eroding the water filtration benefits provided by healthy natural lands.17

More about the new analysis of at-risk monuments

In a new analysis, Conservation Science Partners (CSP) evaluated a set of 31 national monuments designated by the Clinton, Obama, and Biden presidential administrations that could be considered most at risk under the Trump administration.18 Using geospatial data, the analysis quantified the river miles and watersheds within the studied national monument boundaries. The analysis also estimated the number of surface water users who rely directly on local or downstream watersheds supplied by water from the national monuments—and who therefore could be affected by the loss of monument protections. CSP additionally summarized demographic and socioeconomic data of communities in watersheds within or downstream of these monuments. Notably, the analysis did not include data on groundwater, purchased water, or interbasin transfers. As a result, this analysis likely represents a conservative estimate of the people and communities reliant on drinking water from these watersheds.

FIGURE 1

National monuments and water sources most at risk under the Trump administration

Source-water statistics

Note: Hover or click for more detail and use + / – to zoom in / out.

Source: Conservation Science Partners, “Understanding the importance of national monuments through a freshwater lens” (Truckee, CA: 2025).

National monuments and water sources most at risk under the Trump administration

Source-water statistics

Note: Hover or click for more detail and use + / – to zoom in / out.

Source: Conservation Science Partners, “Understanding the importance of national monuments through a freshwater lens” (Truckee, CA: 2025).

U.S. drinking water and rivers at risk

Overall, the 31 at-risk monuments evaluated in Conservation Science Partners’ analysis contain 21,000 miles of rivers and streams—almost double the mileage of rivers protected under the entire National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.19 Eighty-three percent of these river miles are uniquely protected by the national monuments, meaning they would not be otherwise shielded from development if their monument status were stripped away.20 Many of these monuments also sit upstream of major river basins, such as the Colorado, Missouri, and Mississippi; on average, each monument helps protect the water quality of 859 miles of downstream rivers and streams.

Drinking water for more than 13 million Americans is directly supplied by watersheds within or downstream of these national monuments—including in the major metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, San Diego, Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Denver. Notably, the watersheds fed by rivers and lakes within national monuments serve areas that, on average, have higher proportions of historically marginalized populations. Among the 2,125 watersheds found to be affected by at-risk monuments, the average share of nonwhite residents was 32 percent—nearly twice the national average of 18 percent—indicating that the rollback of protections would have disproportionate impacts on nonwhite communities.

CSP analysis by the numbers

13M+

Number of Americans whose drinking water is protected by at-risk national monuments

21K

Miles of rivers and streams within at-risk national monuments

83%

Share of river miles uniquely protected by national monuments

Moreover, many of the watersheds protected by national monuments already face potential declines in water availability due to climate change. According to the CSP analysis, 23 of the 31 monuments provide water to local watersheds that are expected to see further declines in water availability by 2040 due to climate change.21 Some cases are particularly stark: Nearly 90 percent of watersheds overlapping with the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, for example, are expected to see declines in water availability by 2040. Maintaining existing clean drinking water sources will be particularly important in regions with reduced water availability. Additionally, drought-strained watersheds can see declines in water quality,22 particularly when accompanied by more frequent and intense wildfires.23

Regional and national monument spotlights

Statistics for specific national monuments can be explored via the interactive map in Figure 1. Some examples are highlighted below.

San Gabriel Mountains National Monument, California

The San Gabriel Mountains National Monument—established by then-President Barack Obama in 2014 and expanded 10 years later—overlooks the city of Los Angeles and provides access to much-needed green space for the city’s residents and recreation opportunities for millions of visitors each year.24 According to the new water analysis, this monument also protects drinking water for more than 5 million local and downstream users, 60 percent of whom are people of color and nearly 30 percent of whom are low-income residents.

Nearly all—96 percent—of the 1,124 river miles within the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument are uniquely protected by this land designation. Additionally, in a region already experiencing the detrimental effects of frequent droughts,25 almost 60 percent of this monument’s local watersheds are expected to see further declines in water availability by 2040 due to climate change. An erasure of protections that exposes these lands to development and pollution could be harmful to the millions of downstream users in the San Fernando Valley reliant on the precious water for drinking and other uses.

Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, Maine

Located in northern Maine and designated in 2016 to permanently conserve more than 87,500 acres of donated forest land,26 Katahdin Woods and Waters exemplifies the important role that national monuments can play in securing clean water, recreational opportunities, economic benefits, and cultural histories. Anchored by the East Branch of the Penobscot River and its tributaries, the national monument sits on the ancestral homelands of the Penobscot Nation, whose people historically traveled and utilized the river and whose culture remains deeply connected to it.27 Although historic fish runs declined dramatically during the 19th and 20th centuries, river restoration efforts by conservation partners and the Penobscot Nation are allowing fisheries to rebound, offering hope for the future.28

The new analysis finds that local watersheds intersecting Katahdin Woods and Waters rank among the top 73 percent of all watersheds nationally for their ability to produce clean water, while the monument’s conservation protections directly support the drinking water of thousands of downstream users. The monument also provides plentiful outdoor recreation opportunities for New Englanders and visitors alike, including opportunities for fishing in state-designated “‘Heritage Brook Trout’ waters” and for paddling whitewater traversed by writer Henry David Thoreau.29

Colorado River Basin region’s national monuments

For millennia, the Colorado River has been the lifeblood of communities throughout the American Southwest, and its river basin is home to a number of iconic national monuments that could be in the Trump administration’s crosshairs for elimination and future drilling and mining. Four of those national monuments—Bears Ears; Grand Staircase-Escalante; Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon; and Grand Canyon-Parashant—protect a total of 8,775 river miles flowing into the Colorado River.30 A vital resource for the seven states through which it runs, the Colorado River provides water to up to 40 million Americans.31 Cities including Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Phoenix all source drinking water from the Colorado River. The river also supports agricultural production, hydroelectric power, recreational opportunities, and wildlife habitat.32

For the past 25 years, the Colorado River Basin “has been experiencing a historic, extended drought” that has affected water supplies in the region and caused reservoir storage to fall to about half of its capacity.33 With further declines projected due to climate change, conserving the region’s ability to produce clean water is particularly important to handle increased demand from the rapidly growing communities along the Colorado River.34 Additionally, the quality and quantity of the Colorado River Basin’s water are strained by energy development in the area, with 395 existing uranium mines along the river corridor and 800 pending new claims.35

Notably, while estimates in Figure 1 of the number of people with surface water protected by national monuments in the Colorado River Basin are impressive, these statistics substantially underestimate the full reach of those surface waters due to lack of available data. The CSP analysis did not account for the additional drinking water users who tap into water piped to Southern California via the Colorado River Aqueduct and therefore also benefit from upstream land protections.

Several national monuments in the Colorado River Basin and their importance as clean water sources are described below.

Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument, Arizona

Located in Arizona, Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni protects almost 1 million acres,36 including the entirety of the Grand Canyon watershed37 as well as the history, cultural sites, and ceremonial grounds of many Tribal nations.38 The new analysis shows that the monument also shields 1,688 river miles and more than 79,800 drinking water users in downstream watersheds from future threats.

The Grand Canyon area has a long history of controversial and harmful development. For decades, the region was open to uranium mining that had detrimental effects on nearby communities, contributing to kidney failure and cancer among the Navajo Nation39 and leaving groundwater at risk of contamination.40 In 2023, a coalition of 12 Tribes called on then-President Biden to protect the site and permanently preserve their ancestral lands and the health of the watershed of the Grand Canyon and surrounding communities.41 While President Biden’s designation of the national monument did not fully resolve all threats—with mining companies still holding preexisting claims and one active mine operating within the monument’s boundaries42—its protections prevent new claims and other development that could substantially escalate the threat to local and downstream waters.

Bears Ears National Monument, Utah

President Obama established Bears Ears in 2016 in response to a proposal from a coalition of five Tribes—the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Zuni Tribe, and Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation—who called for the protection of these culturally, spiritually, and historically significant lands.43 These Tribes now guide the stewardship of the monument, protecting its rich cultural history and thousands of ancient cliff dwellings, community centers, rock imagery, and artifacts.44

According to the new analysis, the monument also protects 2,274 river miles within its borders and contributes to the water quality of an additional 1,033 river miles downstream. More than 90,000 people in local and downstream watersheds rely on the water that Bears Ears supplies. If monument protections were eliminated, Bears Ears and the water it protects could be particularly vulnerable to threats from uranium mining.45 President Trump’s downsizing of the monument in 2017 was followed by dozens of new mining claims46 and more than 100,000 acres leased for oil and gas drilling in the region surrounding the monument, although the majority of those leases were later canceled.47 While President Biden restored the national monument designation, the previous mining claims are a good indicator of what is likely to come if Trump were to roll back protections again.48

Browns Canyon National Monument, Colorado

Browns Canyon National Monument protects 21,586 acres of public land in Colorado’s upper Arkansas River Valley.49 Considered a “recreationist’s dream” by the U.S. Forest Service, which manages the monument jointly with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, the area draws visitors from all over the country.50 Many come to float the popular whitewater of the Arkansas River, and more than 100 miles of river flowing through the national monument are recognized as “Gold Medal trout waters.”51 For thousands of years, Browns Canyon has served as an important source of water transportation and drinking water.52

According to the new analysis, Browns Canyon National Monument helps protect downstream waters used as a drinking source by more than 1.3 million people today, with 98 percent of the monument’s river miles uniquely protected by its national monument status. The area is expected to be heavily affected by climate change, with 100 percent of local watersheds projected to see water declines by 2040, making its water supplies even more precious and vulnerable.

See also

Conclusion

Lack of access to clean drinking water is a major public health concern, consistently ranking as Americans’ top environmental priority.53 Yet the Trump administration could be on the verge of reversing fundamental protections for public lands that serve as vital clean water sources. Looming threats to national monuments not only endanger iconic landscapes, cultural history, and recreation opportunities but also put the drinking water supply of millions of Americans needlessly at risk.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jenny Rowland-Shea, Sam Zeno, Mona Alsaidi, Shannon Baker-Branstetter, Meghan Miller, Bill Rapp, and Sanjana Bettadpur from the Center for American Progress for their contributions to this report. They would also like to thank Patrick Freeman, Helen Kesting, and Lise Comte from Conservation Science Partners, as well as other external partners and reviewers.

Endnotes

  1. National Park Service, “National Monument Facts and Figures,” available at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/archeology/national-monument-facts-and-figures.htm (last accessed November 2025).
  2. Conservation Science Partners, “Understanding the importance of national monuments through a freshwater lens” (Truckee, CA: 2025) available at https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/11/CSP-Understanding-the-importance-of-national-monuments-through-a-freshwater-lens-20250630.pdf.
  3. The Wilderness Society, “Burgum secretarial orders target monuments, give drilling favored status on public lands,” Press release, February 4, 2025, available at https://www.wilderness.org/articles/press-release/burgum-secretarial-orders-target-monuments-give-drilling-favored-status-public-lands.
  4. The White House, “Presidential Proclamation Modifying the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument,” December 4, 2017, available at https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-modifying-grand-staircase-escalante-national-monument/; The White House, “Presidential Proclamation Modifying the Bears Ears National Monument,” December 4, 2017, available at https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-modifying-bears-ears-national-monument/.
  5. The White House, “FACT SHEET: President Biden Restores Protections for Three National Monuments and Renews American Leadership to Steward Lands, Waters, and Cultural Resources,” Press release, October 7, 2021, available at https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/07/fact-sheet-president-biden-restores-protections-for-three-national-monuments-and-renews-american-leadership-to-steward-lands-waters-and-cultural-resources/.
  6. Jake Spring and Dino Grandoni, “Trump officials consider shrinking 6 national monuments in the West,” The Washington Post, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/04/24/trump-national-monument-reductions-mining-oil/; Jimmy Tobias, Chris D’Angelo, and Roque Planas, “SCOOP: Draft Strategic Plan for Trump’s Interior Department Would Boost Extractive Industries, Cut Protections,” Public Domain, April 22, 2025, available at https://www.publicdomain.media/p/interior-trump-draft-strategic-plan; Office of Planning and Performance Management, “FY 2026-2030 Strategic Plan Draft Framework” (Washington: U.S. Department of the Interior), available at https://www.publicdomain.media/api/v1/file/eecac6f4-8ee3-4d60-a358-099e41a40c68.pdf (last accessed November 2025).
  7. The Wilderness Society, “Burgum secretarial orders target monuments, give drilling favored status on public lands.”
  8. Spring and Grandoni, “Trump officials consider shrinking 6 national monuments in the West”; Tobias, D’Angelo, and Planas, “SCOOP: Draft Strategic Plan for Trump’s Interior Department Would Boost Extractive Industries, Cut Protections.”
  9. Lanora C. Pettit, “Memorandum Opinion for the Counsel to the President: Revocation of Prior Monument Designations” (Washington: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, 2025), available at https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1403101/dl.
  10. The White House, “Nominations Sent to the Senate,” November 5, 2025, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/nominations-sent-to-the-senate-099e/; Rachael Hamby, “Trump’s new pick to run the BLM has a history of working to sell off public land,” Center for Western Priorities, November 12, 2015, available at https://westernpriorities.org/2025/11/trumps-new-pick-to-run-the-blm-has-a-history-of-working-to-sell-off-public-land/.
  11. Rachel Frazin, “Senate removes provision that would sell off public lands from megabill,” The Hill, June 28, 2025, available at https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5375473-senate-removes-provision-that-would-sell-off-public-lands-from-megabill/.
  12. Drew McConville, Mariel Lutz, and Jenny Rowland-Shea, “The Trump Administration’s Expansive Push to Sell Out Public Lands to the Highest Bidder” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2025), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administrations-expansive-push-to-sell-out-public-lands-to-the-highest-bidder/.
  13. The White House, “Unleashing American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific,” April 17, 2025, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/unleashing-american-commercial-fishing-in-the-pacific/.
  14. Tim Peterson, “Rumors Swirl About National Monuments,” Grand Canyon Trust, April 29, 2025, available at https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/blog/rumors-swirl-about-national-monuments/; Morgan Sjogren, “Trump Administration Sets Stage for Attack on National Monuments,” Sierra, July 6, 2025, available at https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/trump-administration-sets-stage-attack-national-monuments; Jennifer Yachnin, Heather Richards, and Scott Streater, “Here are national monuments Trump could dismantle,” E&E News, June 17, 2025, available at https://www.eenews.net/articles/here-are-national-monuments-trump-could-dismantle/.
  15. Sam Zeno, “Disappearing Parks: How Project 2025 Would Decrease Protections for Nature,” Center for American Progress, October 21, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/disappearing-parks-how-project-2025-would-decrease-protections-for-nature/.
  16. Water Science School, “Mining and Water Quality,” U.S. Geological Survey, June 8, 2018, available at https://www.usgs.gov/water-science-school/science/mining-and-water-quality; Christian Wolkersdorfer and Elke Mugova, “Effects of Mining on Surface Water,” in Thomas Mehner and Klement Tockner, eds., Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, Second Edition (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022), available at https://www.wolkersdorfer.info/publication/pdf/Effects%20of%20Mining%20on%20Surface%20Water.pdf; Lucy Allen and others, “Fossil Fuels and Water Quality,” in Peter Gleick, ed., The World’s Water (Washington: Island Press, 2012), available at https://worldwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/chapter_4_fossil_fuel_and_water_quality.pdf; Kelly Maloney and others, “Unconventional oil and gas spills: Materials, volumes, and risks to surface waters in four states of the U.S.,” Science of the Total Environment 581-582 (2017): 369–377, available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969716328327.
  17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Basic Information and Answers to Frequent Questions,” available at https://www.epa.gov/hwp/basic-information-and-answers-frequent-questions (last accessed November 2025).
  18. Conservation Science Partners, “Understanding the importance of national monuments through a freshwater lens.”
  19. National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, “River Miles,” available at https://www.rivers.gov/rivers/rivers/river-stats (last accessed November 2025).
  20. Note: Conservation Science Partners defines “unique protection” as when rivers and streams have no protection other than national monument status covering more than 5 percent of their length. Conservation Science Partners, “Understanding the importance of national monuments through a freshwater lens.”
  21. Note: Projected declines in water yield provided by CSP’s analysis are based on a high-emissions climate scenario. Ibid.
  22. Duncan Graham, Marc Bierkens, and Michelle van Vliet, “Impacts of drought and heatwaves on river water quality worldwide,” Journal of Hydrology 629 (2024), available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423015329.
  23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Wildfires and Water Quality Research,” available at https://www.epa.gov/water-research/wildfires-and-water-quality-research (last accessed November 2025).
  24. National Forest Foundation, “Treasured Landscapes, Unforgettable Experiences,” available at https://www.nationalforests.org/who-we-are/sgnm (last accessed November 2025); The White House, “FACT SHEET: President Biden Expands San Gabriel Mountains National Monument and Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument,” Press release, May 2, 2024, available at https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/02/fact-sheet-president-biden-expands-san-gabriel-mountains-national-monument-and-berryessa-snow-mountain-national-monument/.
  25. Center for Climate Integrity, “Los Angeles County Climate Impacts and Costs” (Washington: 2025), available at https://climateintegrity.org/uploads/media/CCI_LosAngelesCounty_Impacts_Costs_2023.pdf.
  26. The White House, “Presidential Proclamation — Establishment of the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument,” Press release, August 24, 2016, available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/08/24/presidential-proclamation-establishment-katahdin-woods-and-waters.
  27. Wabanaki Alliance, “Penobscot Nation, penawahpkekeyak,” available at https://www.wabanakialliance.com/penobscot-nation/ (last accessed November 2025).
  28. American Rivers, “Penobscot River,” available at https://www.americanrivers.org/river/penobscot-river/ (last accessed November 2025); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, “Building Bridges to Restore Connectivity: Penobscot Nation and NOAA Fisheries Improve Atlantic Salmon Resilience,” November 5, 2024, available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/building-bridges-restore-connectivity-penobscot-nation-and-noaa-fisheries-improve.
  29. Shauna Stephenson, “Spotlight on Katahdin Area Woods and Waters,” Trout Unlimited, April 12, 2017, available at https://www.tu.org/magazine/uncategorized/spotlight-on-katahdin-area-woods-and-waters/.
  30. Note: 8,775 is the sum of the total river miles for these four national monuments based on numbers provided in the new analysis. See Figure 1.
  31. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Colorado River Basin,” available at https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/ (last accessed November 2025).
  32. Ibid.
  33. U.S. Geological Survey, “Drought in the Colorado River Basin,” available at https://labs.waterdata.usgs.gov/visualizations/OWDI-drought/en/index.html (last accessed November 2025).
  34. Save the Colorado, “Population Growth,” available at https://savethecolorado.org/threats/population-growth/ (last accessed November 2025).
  35. Save the Colorado, “Mineral Resources,” available at https://savethecolorado.org/threats/mineral-resources/ (last accessed November 2025).
  36. Bureau of Land Management, “Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni-Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument,” available at https://www.blm.gov/national-conservation-lands/arizona/ancestral-footprints (last accessed November 2025); Ellen Montgomery and Niklas Frimberger, “How to visit Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni National Monument,” Environment Arizona Research & Policy Center, February 11, 2025, available at https://environmentamerica.org/arizona/center/resources/how-to-visit-baaj-nwaavjo-itah-kukveni-ancestral-footprints-of-the-grand-canyon-national-monument/.
  37. Annette McGivney, “Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni,” Arizona Highways, October 2024, available at https://www.arizonahighways.com/article/baaj-nwaavjo-itah-kukveni.
  38. Grand Canyon Trust, “Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Grand Canyon National Monument,” available at https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/baaj-nwaavjo-itah-kukveni-grand-canyon-national-monument/ (last accessed November 2025).
  39. Laurel Morales, “For The Navajo Nation, Uranium Mining’s Deadly Legacy Lingers,” NPR, April 10, 2016, available at https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/04/10/473547227/for-the-navajo-nation-uranium-minings-deadly-legacy-lingers.
  40. Dawn Attride, “Troubled Waters: In an iconic corner of the Grand Canyon, a uranium mine may threaten a tribe’s sole water source,” Science, August 15, 2025, available at https://www.science.org/content/article/uranium-mine-may-pose-threat-grand-canyon-drinking-water.
  41. Amber Reimondo, “Tribes Propose New Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni Grand Canyon National Monument,” Grand Canyon Trust, April 11, 2023, available at https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/blog/tribes-propose-baaj-nwaavjo-itah-kukveni-grand-canyon-national-monument/.
  42. Grand Canyon Trust, “Map of Active Mining Claims Within Grand Canyon Withdrawal Area May 2022,” August 5, 2022, available at https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/resources/map-active-mining-claims-within-grand-canyon-withdrawal-area-may-2022/.
  43. Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, “The Bears Ears Commission,” available at https://www.bearsearscoalition.org/the-bears-ears-commission/ (last accessed November 2025).
  44. World Monuments Fund, “Bears Ears National Monument,” available at https://www.wmf.org/projects/bears-ears-national-monument (last accessed November 2025).
  45. Hiroko Tabuchi, “Uranium Miners Pushed Hard for a Comeback. They Got Their Wish.”, The New York Times, January 13, 2018, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/13/climate/trump-uranium-bears-ears.html.
  46. The White House, “Presidential Proclamation Modifying the Bears Ears National Monument”; Grand Canyon Trust, “Map of New Mining Claims in Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears July 2018,” October 2, 2018, available at https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/resources/map-new-mining-claims-grand-staircase-escalante-and-bears-ears-july-2018/.
  47. Bureau of Land Management, “Utah State Office Evaluation of March and December 2018 Oil and Gas Lease Sales Environmental Assessment” (Salt Lake City, UT: 2024), available at https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/2024989/200562193/20109759/251009750/2024-05-03-DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2023-0006-DR.pdf; Emma Keddington, “Tens of thousands of leased acres used for oil and gas production in Bears Ears area canceled,” KSL News Radio, May 8, 2024, available at https://kslnewsradio.com/environment-outdoors/tens-of-thousands-of-leased-acres-used-for-oil-and-gas-production-in-bears-ears-area-cancelled/2101070/.
  48. The White House, “FACT SHEET: President Biden Restores Protections for Three National Monuments and Renews American Leadership to Steward Lands, Waters, and Cultural Resources.”
  49. U.S. Forest Service, “Browns Canyon National Monument,” available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/visit/national-monuments/browns-canyon (last accessed November 2025).
  50. Ibid.
  51. Friends of Browns Canyon, “Browns Canyon National Monument,” available at https://brownscanyon.org/ (last accessed November 2025).
  52. The White House, “Presidential Proclamation — Browns Canyon National Monument,” Press release, February 19, 2015, available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/19/presidential-proclamation-browns-canyon-national-monument.
  53. Leah Zamesnik, “Poll Briefing: The State of Public Opinion on Water,” Environmental Polling Consortium, April 2, 2025, available at https://partnershipproject.org/uploads/dlm_uploads/2022/11/EPC-for-Apr.-2025-Water-Briefing-Intro-Deck.pdf.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

Sophie Conroy

Research Associate

Drew McConville

Senior Fellow

Team

Conservation Policy

We work to protect our lands, waters, ocean, and wildlife to address the linked climate and biodiversity crises. This work helps to ensure that all people can access and benefit from nature and that conservation and climate investments build a resilient, just, and inclusive economy.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Default Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Variable Opt Ins

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.