Center for American Progress
Donate
See all topics
See all states
Search Search
A CAP analysis finds that states have failed to strengthen their judicial ethics rules to address the growth in campaign cash.
Advancing Racial Equity and Justice, Restoring Social Trust in Democracy, Courts
Senior Director, Media Relations
[email protected]
Senior Director, Government Affairs
Senior Manager, State and Local Government Affairs
This interactive contains a correction.
To learn more about each state’s judicial ethics rules, select a state on the map below. To read the full analysis, see “State Judicial Ethics Rules Fail to Address Flood of Campaign Cash from Lawyers and Litigants.”
Correction, May 7, 2014: This map was updated to show that Arizona and California passed and Alaska and Arkansas failed. June 6, 2014: This map was updated to reflect that Utah received 15 points in the “campaign cash as a basis for recusal” category and therefore tied with California for the highest grade.
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.
Deputy Director, Legal Progress
The Democracy team is advancing an agenda to win structural reforms that strengthen the U.S. system and give everyone an equal voice in the democratic process.