Fast Facts: Economic Security for Women and Families in South Carolina
Fast Facts: Economic Security for Women and Families in South Carolina
In order to advance economic security for women and families in South Carolina, policymakers should prioritize policies that ensure economic equality and health care access for all.
Click here to view other state fact sheets in this series.
South Carolina women face obstacles in the pursuit of quality health care, representation in leadership, and economic security. Moving forward, policymakers should continue to promote equal workplace practices through policies such as the recently adopted legislation to combat pregnancy discrimination in the workplace.1 Policies that ensure equal pay for equal work; higher, livable wages; and access to reproductive health care will help secure the success of women and their families in South Carolina.
Women need policies that reflect their roles as providers and caregivers. In South Carolina, mothers are the sole, primary, or co-breadwinners in 70.3 percent of families, and these numbers are higher for some women of color.2 The following policy recommendations can help support the economic security of women and families in South Carolina.
Promote equal pay for equal work
Although federal law prohibits unequal pay for equal work, there is more that can be done to ensure that both women and men across South Carolina enjoy the fullest protections against discrimination.
- South Carolina women who are full-time, year-round workers earned about 77 cents for every dollar that South Carolina men earned in 2017;3 if the wage gap continues to close at its current rate, women will not reach parity in the state until 2088.4 The wage gap is even larger for black women and Latinas in South Carolina, who earned 57.2 cents and 54.1 cents, respectively, for every dollar that white men earned in 2016.5
- Due to the gender wage gap, each woman in South Carolina will lose an average of $399,800 over the course of her lifetime.6
Increase the minimum wage
Women constitute a disproportionate share of low-wage workers; raising the minimum wage would help hardworking women across South Carolina and enable them to better support their families.
- Women make up nearly two-thirds of all minimum wage workers in the United States.7 More than half of all minimum wage workers in South Carolina are women.8
- In South Carolina, the current minimum wage is $7.25 per hour.9 The minimum wage for workers who receive tips is $2.13 per hour.10 Nearly three-quarters of tipped wage workers in South Carolina are women.11
- Increasing the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2024 would boost wages for 457,000 women in South Carolina and more than 23 million women nationally. Sixty percent of the South Carolina workers who would be affected by raising the minimum wage to $15 are women.12
Guarantee access to quality health care
Women need access to comprehensive health services—including abortion and maternity care—in order to thrive as breadwinners, caregivers, and employees. To ensure women are able to access high-quality care, states should, at minimum, strengthen family planning programs such as Title X; protect Medicaid; and end onerous restrictions that reduce access to abortion care and undermine the patient-provider relationship. At the state level, South Carolina should ensure that women have access to the full spectrum of quality, affordable, and women-centered reproductive health services.
- In 2014, more than 323,000 women in South Carolina were in need of publicly funded family planning services and supplies, and 26 percent of those women were uninsured.13
- Threats to repeal pre-existing condition protections under the Affordable Care Act would impact millions of women. More than 67 million women and girls nationally have pre-existing conditions and could be denied insurance, including about 1,025,000 women in South Carolina.14
- Title X—the nation’s only federal domestic program focused solely on providing family planning and other related preventive care, such as contraception, sexually transmitted infection testing, and cancer screenings—served about 58,500 women in South Carolina in 2017, down from about 83,500 women in 2014.15 Title X funding has itself decreased, from about $6.1 million in 2014 to about $5.7 million in 2017.16
- When distributing family planning funds, South Carolina gives lowest priority to private reproductive health-focused providers.17
- There are several state restrictions on abortion care itself: Abortion is covered by insurance policies for public employees and in the state’s health exchange under the Affordable Care Act only in cases of life endangerment, rape, or incest; public funding is also only available for abortion in cases of life endangerment, rape, or incest. South Carolina requires biased counseling that gives women inaccurate and misleading information about abortion care; a 24-hour waiting period is required before women can undergo the procedure. Parental consent is required for young people under age 17, and the use of telemedicine to administer medication abortion is prohibited.18
- South Carolina’s infant mortality rate—7 deaths per 1,000 live births—is higher than the national rate of 5.9 deaths per 1,000 live births.19 The state’s maternal mortality rate is 24 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births,20 compared with the national rate of 18 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.21
Ensure workers have access to paid sick days
Everyone gets sick, but not everyone is afforded the time to get better. Many women go to work sick because they fear that they will be fired for missing work. Allowing employees to earn paid sick days helps keep families, communities, and the economy healthy.
- More than 34 million U.S. employees, or 29 percent of the nation’s private sector workforce, do not have access to paid sick days.22
- In South Carolina, the rate is even higher: 46.5 percent of private sector workers, or 719,706 people, do not receive paid sick days.23
- In 2017, the South Carolina Legislature passed a law pre-empting municipalities from establishing, mandating, or requiring employee benefits such as paid sick leave.24
Ensure fair scheduling practices
Many low-wage and part-time workers—approximately 60 percent of whom are women25—face erratic work schedules and have little control over when they work and for how long.
- More than 1 in 4 low-wage U.S. workers have a schedule that is nonstandard—that is, outside of the traditional 9-to-5 workweek.26 This can be especially difficult for parents who need to plan for child care.
- In addition to threatening the economic security of these workers and their families, unfair scheduling practices are often accompanied by reduced access to health benefits and increased potential for sexual harassment.27
Provide access to paid family and medical leave
Access to paid family and medical leave would allow workers to be with their newborn children during the critical early stages of the child’s life; to care for an aging parent or spouse; to recover from their own illness; or to assist in a loved one’s recovery.
- Only 17 percent of civilian workers in the United States have access to paid family leave through their employers.28
- Unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is inaccessible to 60 percent of working people in South Carolina. Workers and families in the state need paid family and medical leave for reasons other than childbirth. For example, nearly 1 in 4 workers in South Carolina is at least 55 years old, and in fewer than 15 years, the state’s population that is ages 65 and older will grow by more than one-third.29 South Carolina’s aging population means an increase in older adults with serious medical conditions who will need additional care.
- National data show that 55 percent of employees who take unpaid leave through the FMLA use it for personal medical reasons. Twenty-one percent of workers use leave for the birth or adoption of a child, while another 18 percent use it to care for a family member.30
Expand quality, affordable child care
Families need child care to ensure they are able to work, but many lack access to affordable, high-quality child care options that support young children’s development and meet the needs of working families.
- Sixty-eight percent of South Carolina children younger than age 6 have all available parents in the workforce, which makes access to affordable, high-quality child care a necessity.31
- For a South Carolina family with one infant and one 4-year-old, the annual price of a child care center averages $12,393 per year, or almost one-quarter of the median income for a South Carolina family with children.32
- South Carolina does better than the national average on children enrolled in public preschool, with 48 percent of 4-year-olds enrolled.33
Protect workers against all forms of gender-based violence
Women cannot fully participate in the economy if they face the threat of violence and harassment. There are a number of steps lawmakers can take to prevent violence against women and to support survivors, including establishing greater workplace accountability; strengthening enforcement; increasing funding for survivor support services; and educating the public on sexual harassment in the workplace.34
- In South Carolina, 40.1 percent of women have experienced contact sexual violence in their lifetimes,35 and 30.2 percent of women have experienced noncontact sexual harassment.36 Given that research at the national level suggests that as many as 70 percent of sexual harassment charges go unreported, these state numbers likely only scratch the surface.37
- Forty-two percent of South Carolina women have experienced intimate partner violence, which can include physical violence, sexual violence, or stalking by an intimate partner.38 Experiencing intimate partner violence has been shown to hinder women’s economic potential in many ways, including loss of pay from missed days of work and housing instability.39
Protecting the rights of incarcerated women
The growing problem of mass incarceration in the United States hinders the economic potential of those affected and disproportionately harms communities of color.40 Incarceration can have a particularly destabilizing effect on families with an incarcerated mother, especially if that woman is a breadwinner. The experience of incarceration is also uniquely traumatic for women in ways that can deter long-term economic security, even after release.41
- The incarceration rate in South Carolina is 408 per 100,000 people.42 Approximately 7.1 percent of prisoners in South Carolina are women.43
- Women are the fastest-growing segment of the overall U.S. prison population, but there are fewer federal prisons for women than there are for men, contributing to overcrowding and hostile conditions for incarcerated women.44
- Incarcerated women suffer from a wide range of abuses at the hands of the prison system, including lack of access to menstrual hygiene products; lack of adequate nutrition and prenatal care; shackling during pregnancy and childbirth; and separation from and further disruption in relationships with children for whom they are primary caregivers.45
Promote women’s political leadership
Across the United States, women are underrepresented in political office: They constitute 51 percent of the population but only 29 percent of elected officials.46
- Women make up 52 percent of South Carolina’s population but only 26 percent of its elected officials.47
- Women of color constitute 19 percent of the state’s population but only 8 percent of its officeholders.48
Shilpa Phadke is the vice president of the Women’s Initiative at the Center for American Progress. Diana Boesch is a research assistant of women’s economic security for the Women’s Initiative at the Center. Nora Ellmann is a research assistant for women’s health and rights for the Women’s Initiative.
- Sheila Willis, “South Carolina Delivers New Pregnancy Accommodations Law,” Society for Human Resource Management, June 12, 2018, available at https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/south-carolina-delivers-new-pregnancy-accommodations-law.aspx.
- Sarah Jane Glynn’s analysis of Miriam King and others, “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 5.0. (Machine-readable database)” (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2017), on file with Sarah Jane Glynn.
- National Partnership for Women and Families, “America’s Women and the Wage Gap” (2018), available at http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/workplace-fairness/fair-pay/americas-women-and-the-wage-gap.pdf.
- Status of Women in the States, “The Economic Status of Women in South Carolina” (2018), available at https://statusofwomendata.org/wp-content/themes/witsfull/factsheets/economics/factsheet-south-carolina.pdf.
- National Women’s Law Center, “The Wage Gap for Black Women State Rankings: 2016” (2018), available at https://nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Black-Women-State-by-State-2018.pdf; National Women’s Law Center, “The Wage Gap for Latina Women State Rankings: 2016” (2018), available at https://nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Latina-Women-State-by-State-2018.pdf.
- National Women’s Law Center, “Lifetime Wage Gap Losses for Women: 2016 State Rankings” (2018), available at https://nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Women-Lifetime-Losses-State-by-State-2018.pdf.
- National Women’s Law Center, “Women and the Minimum Wage, State by State” (2018), available at https://nwlc.org/resources/women-and-minimum-wage-state-state/.
- National Women’s Law Center, “Women and the Minimum Wage, State by State” (2018), available at https://nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Women-Minimum-Wage-2018.pdf.
- National Women’s Law Center and Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, “Tipped Workers State by State” (2017), available at https://nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Tipped-Workers-State-by-State-7.20.17.pdf.
- Economic Policy Institute, “State tables on $15 minimum wage impact” (2017), available at https://www.epi.org/files/2017/MW-State-Tables.pdf; David Cooper, “Raising the minimum wage to $15 by 2024 would lift wages for 41 million American workers” (Washington: Economic Policy Institute, 2017), available at https://www.epi.org/publication/15-by-2024-would-lift-wages-for-41-million/.
- Jennifer J. Frost, Lori Frohwirth, and Mia R. Zolna, “Contraceptive Needs and Services, 2014 Update,” Table 3 and Table 6 (Washington: Guttmacher Institute, 2014), available at https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/contraceptive-needs-and-services-2014_1.pdf.
- Center for American Progress and National Partnership for Women & Families, “Moving Backward: Efforts to Undo Pre-Existing Condition Protections Put Millions of Women and Girls at Risk” (2018), available at http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/health-care/aca-pre-ex-protections-women-girls.pdf.
- Office of Assistant Secretary for Health, Title X Family Planning Annual Report: 2014 National Summary (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2015), available at https://www.hhs.gov/opa/sites/default/files/title-x-fpar-2014-national.pdf; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Title X Family Planning Annual Report: 2017 National Summary (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018), available at https://www.hhs.gov/opa/sites/default/files/title-x-fpar-2017-national-summary.pdf.
- National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, “Title X in Your State,” available at https://www.nationalfamilyplanning.org/pages/issues/nfprha-interactive-map (last accessed September 2018).
- Guttmacher Institute, “State Family Planning Funding Restrictions,” available at https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-family-planning-funding-restrictions (last accessed September 2018).
- Guttmacher Institute, “State Facts About Abortion: South Carolina” (2018), available at https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-south-carolina.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Infant Mortality Rates by State: 2016,” available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm (last accessed July 2018).
- South Carolina Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Review Committee, “Legislative Brief 2017” (2017), available at https://www.scstatehouse.gov/reports/DHEC/MMMR%202017%20Leg%20Brief_final%2003.28.2018.pdf.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System,” available at https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pregnancy-mortality-surveillance-system.htm (last accessed September 2018).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2018 (U.S. Department of Labor, 2018), available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2018/employee-benefits-in-the-united-states-march-2018.pdf; National Partnership for Women and Families, “Paid Sick Days: Quick Facts,” available at http://www.paidsickdays.org/research-resources/quick-facts.html (last accessed September 2018).
- Institute for Women’s Policy Research and National Partnership for Women and Families, “Workers’ Access to Paid Sick Days in the States” (2015), available at http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/psd/workers-access-to-paid-sick-days-in-the-states.pdf.
- General Bill, S. 218, South Carolina General Assembly 122 sess. (April , 2017), available at https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/bills/218.htm.
- National Women’s Law Center, “Collateral Damage: Scheduling Challenges for Workers in Low-Wage Jobs and Their Consequences” (2017), available at https://nwlc.org/resources/collateral-damage-scheduling-challenges-workers-low-wage-jobs-and-their-consequences/; National Women’s Law Center, “Part-Time Workers Are Paid Less, Have Less Access to Benefits—and Two-Thirds Are Women” (2015), available at https://nwlc.org/resources/part-time-workers-are-paid-less-have-less-access-benefits%E2%80%94and-two-thirds-are-women/.
- National Women’s Law Center, “Set Up For Success: Fair Schedules Are Critical for Working Parents and Their Children’s Well-Being” (2017), available at https://nwlc.org/resources/set-up-for-success-why-fair-schedules-are-critical-for-working-parents-and-their-childrens-well-being/; María E. Enchautegui, “Nonstandard Work Schedules and the Well-Being of Low-Income Families” (Washington: Urban Institute, 2013), available at https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/32696/412877-Nonstandard-Work-Schedules-and-the-Well-being-of-Low-Income-Families.PDF.
- Katherine Gallagher Robbins and Shirin Arslan, “Schedules That Work for Working Families,” Center for American Progress, December 18, 2017, available at https://americanprogress.org/issues/poverty/news/2017/12/18/444245/schedules-work-working-families/.
- S. Bureau of Labor Statistics National Compensation Survey, “Employee Benefits Survey, Table 32. Leave benefits: Access, civilian workers, March 2018” available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2018/ownership/civilian/table32a.htm (last accessed September 2018).
- National Partnership for Women and Families, “Paid Leave Means a Stronger South Carolina” (2018), available at http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/paid-leave/paid-leave-means-a-stronger-south-carolina.pdf.
- Jacob Alex Klerman, Kelly Daley, and Alyssa Pozniak, “Family and Medical Leave in 2012: Technical Report” (Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., 2014), available at https://www.dol.gov/asp/evaluation/fmla/FMLA-2012-Technical-Report.pdf.
- Annie E. Casey Foundation KIDS COUNT, “Children under age 6 with all available parents in the labor force,” available at https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/5057-children-under-age-6-with-all-available-parents-in-the-labor-force?loc=37&loct=2&loc=37&loct=2#detailed/2/42/false/870,573,869,36,868/any/11472,11473 (last accessed October 2018).
- Child Care Aware of America, “2017 State Child Care Facts in the State of: South Carolina,” available at http://usa.childcareaware.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SC_Facts.pdf (last accessed October 2018).
- National Institute for Early Education Research, “South Carolina,” available at http://nieer.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/South-Carolina_YB2017.pdf (last accessed October 2018).
- Jocelyn Frye, “From Politics to Policy: Turning the Corner on Sexual Harassment,” Center for American Progress, January 31, 2018, available at https://americanprogress.org/issues/women/news/2018/01/31/445669/politics-policy-turning-corner-sexual-harassment/.
- “Contact sexual violence includes rape, being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, and/or unwanted sexual contact.” See Sharon G. Smith and others, “The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010–2012 State Report,” Table 3.9 (Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012), available at https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf.
- Noncontact unwanted sexual experiences include harassment, unwanted exposure to sexual body parts or making a victim show their body parts, and/or making a victim look at or participate in sexual photos or movies. See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Sexual Violence: Definitions,” available at https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/definitions.html (last accessed October 2018).
- Chai R. Feldblum and Victoria A. Lipnic, “Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace” (Washington: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2016), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/report.cfm.
- Smith and others, “The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey,” Table 5.7.
- Asha DuMonthier and Malore Dusenbery, “Intersections of Domestic Violence and Economic Security” (Washington: Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2016), available at https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/B362-Domestic-Violence-and-Economic-Security-1.pdf.
- Angela Hanks, “Ban the Box and Beyond” (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2017), available at https://americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2017/07/27/436756/ban-box-beyond/.
- E. Ann Carson, “Prisoners in 2016,” Table 7 (U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2018), available at https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p16.pdf.
- Ibid., Table 2.
- Alec Hamilton, “For Female Inmates In New York City, Prison Is A Crowded, Windowless Room,” NPR, January 16, 2017, available at https://www.npr.org/2017/01/16/505315466/for-female-inmates-in-new-york-city-prison-is-a-crowded-windowless-room.
- Khala James, “Upholding the Dignity of Incarcerated Women,” Center for American Progress, December 22, 2017, available at https://americanprogress.org/issues/women/news/2017/12/22/444468/upholding-dignity-incarcerated-women/.
- Reflective Democracy Campaign, “Reflective Democracy Research Findings: Summary Report, October, 2017,” available at https://wholeads.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/reflective-democracy-2017-research-summary.pdf (last accessed October 2018).
- Reflective Democracy Campaign, “How Does Your State Rank in the National Representation Index?”, available at https://wholeads.us/electedofficials/ (last accessed October 2018).
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.
Vice President, Women\'s Initiative
Policy Analyst, Women’s Economic Security
Research Associate, Women’s Health and Rights