CAP en Español
Small CAP Banner

RELEASE: Side-by-Side Comparison of Debt Ceiling Plans Shows President Is Willing to Compromise

  • print icon
  • SHARE:
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • Share on Google+
  • Email icon

Contact: Madeline Meth
Phone: 202.741.6277

By Michael Linden | July 25, 2011

Washington, D.C.– On Friday the Republican leadership walked away from yet another deficit reduction proposal from President Barack Obama, throwing the negotiations over raising the debt ceiling into chaos. If Congress doesn’t raise the ceiling by August 2 there could be extremely dire consequences for everyone from homeowners to states to social security recipients to small business owners. In order to avoid those consequences the president is willing to agree to a deal that is actually much more conservative than any of the other bipartisan plans offered recently.

Today, the Center for American Progress released the infographic below showing that the president’s latest offer to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is heavily titled toward spending cuts. In fact, the president’s offer contained about $1 trillion less revenue than the recent proposal from the so-called Gang of Six, a group that includes three Republican senators and three Democratic senators. It also represents significant movement from the president’s original debt reduction framework, which itself was already more conservative than the recommendations from the chairs of the debt commission (Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson) last December.

Unfortunately the Republican leadership still turned the president down despite his willingness to offer cuts to programs Democrats traditionally defend and to agree to much less revenue than all other bipartisan deals.

Note: The amount of deficit reduction in each plan shown here was derived by comparing the plan to a baseline that approximates the effects of continuing current policies. That means extending all the Bush tax cuts, indexing the alternative minimum tax to inflation, and preventing scheduled but never implemented cuts to Medicare doctors. The baseline also adjusts defense spending to account for a projected drawdown in troops deployed for overseas military operations.

See also:

To speak to experts on this issue, please contact Anna Soellner at or 202.478.5322.


To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Liz Bartolomeo (poverty, health care)
202.481.8151 or

Print: Tom Caiazza (foreign policy, energy and environment, LGBT issues, gun-violence prevention)
202.481.7141 or

Print: Allison Preiss (economy, education)
202.478.6331 or

Print: Tanya Arditi (immigration, Progress 2050, race issues, demographics, criminal justice, Legal Progress)
202.741.6258 or

Print: Chelsea Kiene (women's issues,, faith)
202.478.5328 or

Print: Elise Shulman (oceans)
202.796.9705 or

Print: Benton Strong (Center for American Progress Action Fund)
202.481.8142 or

Spanish-language and ethnic media: Jennifer Molina
202.796.9706 or

TV: Rachel Rosen
202.483.2675 or

Radio: Chelsea Kiene
202.478.5328 or