Article

Iraq, Pentagon spending and the Iowa Caucuses

But as we inevitably disengage f rom Iraq, it's essential that America evaluate not just what went wrong there but also take a broader look at America's national security requirements and whether the Pentagon budget is suff icient to protect America.

Residents of the Hawkeye state will no doubt hear plenty of plans in the coming months about how America should deal with the mess in Iraq.

And for good reason. The mess in Iraq clearly deserves priority attention by our political leaders and foreign policy analysts.

But as we inevitably disengage from Iraq, it’s essential that America evaluate not just what went wrong there but also take a broader look at America’s national security requirements and whether the Pentagon budget is sufficient to protect America.

Contrary to the common (and of ten unquestioned) assumption, spending more money doesn’t necessarily buy us more security.

The Pentagon currently absorbs more than half of the federal government’s discretionary budget ­­ at a whopping $500 billion proposed for next year surpassing the heights reached in the 1980s when I was President Reagan’s assistant secretary of defense. This baseline budget doesn’t even include the money spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Read more here.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

Lawrence J. Korb

Senior Fellow