Donald Trump’s attacks on the legitimacy of America’s legal system are growing increasingly dangerous and brazen.
The compositions of the country’s federal courts should better reflect the nation’s increasingly diverse population.
Meaningful access to abortion care, as well as the ability to enforce abortion and other civil and human rights in court, are at stake in the upcoming Supreme Court case.
The appeals court in the Texas v. United States health care repeal lawsuit ruled the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate unconstitutional but left in doubt the rest of the law, fueling uncertainty that could harm markets in the near term.
Civil justice reform requires an all-of-government approach.
A troubling trend suggests serious evidence of corruption at the Justice Department is going unexamined by its watchdog.
The scope of the marital presumption of parentage must be expanded to be more LGBTQ-inclusive.
President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine demonstrate just how much he thinks he can get away with. Congress must hold him accountable.
These fact sheets examine the lack of diversity in the federal judiciary.
The federal judiciary does not reflect the population that it serves, which has severe consequences for both the institution’s legitimacy and the parties who come before it.
Kavanaugh’s appointment to the nation’s highest bench is a direct result of the increasingly ideological nature of the courts and ethical loopholes that benefit federal judges.
President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine demonstrate just how much he thinks he can get away with. Congress must show him that he is wrong.
Interior Secretary David Bernhardt wants to make it tougher for environmental watchdogs to hold the Interior Department accountable, but his new policy wastes taxpayer funds.
The U.S. judiciary must address issues of sexual harassment and accountability in order to preserve public faith in its legitimacy.
An average of 45,600 people would lose coverage in each congressional district if the ACA were repealed.