In the News

Mandating National Service Is Not the Answer

Lawrence J. Korb argues against mandatory national service, particularly because of the disproportionate effects it would have on low-income communities.

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, one of two Democratic presidential candidates with military service, said that national service will become one of the themes of his campaign and that he hopes to make it — if not legally binding — a social norm. While this is certainly not a new issue, it is not one that has traditionally been discussed as much as it should have.

Between 2003 and 2013, for example, former U.S. Representative Charles Rangel of New York made five unsuccessful attempts to introduce legislation to require all people in the United States, between the age of 18 and 24, to either serve in the military or perform civilian service related to national defense. Similarly, the efforts of Stan McChrystal, the former commander of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, to get voters, donors and candidates to work together to make service year a common expectation also fell flat, as did the efforts of the Washington Post editorial board in 2016.

The above excerpt was originally published in InsideSources. Click here to view the full article.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.


Lawrence J. Korb

Senior Fellow