In the News

Fighting ISIS Without Destroying Iraq

Brian Katulis writes that the campaign against ISIS could either help bring Iraqis together or tear the country apart.

President Barack Obama’s decision last week to double the number of U.S. troops in Iraq and request $5 billion more for military operations in the Middle East marks a new phase in the fight against Islamic State (ISIS).

Mr. Obama offered no timeline for this mission, which is likely to outlast his presidency. More than three months after Mr. Obama began airstrikes against ISIS, the political and security situations in Iraq are still grave.

First among the complications is the dearth of effective partners in Iraq. Airstrikes can do only so much without reliable ground forces countering ISIS. Thanks to poor weather and spotty intelligence, only one out of four strike missions has dropped weapons, according to U.S. Central Command. One element of good intelligence is trustworthy eyes and ears on the ground.

The above excerpt was originally published in The Wall Street Journal. Click here to view the full article.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

 (Brian Katulis)

Brian Katulis

Senior Fellow