National Security Policy Weekly banner
This Week
  • Safe at Home: A National Security Strategy to Protect the American Homeland, P.J. Crowley
  • Time to Change Course, Caroline Wadhams
  • A War We Must End, John Podesta, Ray Takeyh, and Lawrence J. Korb
  • ElBaradei and Iran, Joseph Cirincione and Ray Takeyh
  • Kosovo -- What's at Stake?, Spencer P. Boyer
  • ENOUGH: Northern Uganda, The ENOUGH Project
  • Pakistan's Enduring Challenges, Caroline Wadhams, Brian Katulis, and Colin Cookman
  • Pakistan: The Next Steps, Caroline Wadhams & Brian Katulis
  • Will Iran Ever Address Key Issues?, Andrew J. Grotto
  • Afghanistan Is Not Iraq, Lawrence J. Korb and Caroline Wadhams
Expert Commentary
  • Making Our Nation as Safe as it Can Be, P.J. Crowley
  • A Homeland Security Blueprint for Next Administration, P.J. Crowley
This Week

P.J. Crowley, "Safe at Home: A National Security Strategy to Protect the American Homeland, the Real Central Front," Center for American Progress, February 25, 2008
The Bush administration’s political rhetoric that we are defeating terrorists in Baghdad so we do not have to confront them here is fiction. This is not an either-or proposition. The risk of a terrorist attack on the United States is on the rise both despite and because of what we have done over the past seven years. The United States is not as safe as it should be. We need to reorder our strategic priorities now.

Click here to read the full report.

Caroline Wadhams, "Time to Change Course," International Affairs Forum, February 25, 2008
Despite the worrying trends in Afghanistan, the international community still has not made the decision to turn the situation around. The will is not there. Even for the United States, which has contributed more than $100 billion to the effort and now has 27,000 U.S. troops on the ground, Afghanistan is not the priority. Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, recently characterized the administration’s position perfectly in a hearing before Congress when he stated, "In Afghanistan, we do what we can. In Iraq, we do what we must."

Click here to read the full article.


Despite the Democratic presidential candidates' expressed commitment to ending the war in Iraq, there is unease among the party's base. Some ardent activists have suggested that upon election, a new Democratic president will come under inordinate pressure to sustain the U.S. military commitment to Iraq, albeit with some modifications. This concern demonstrates both the difficulty of ending a controversial war and the necessity of doing so.

Click here to read the full article.

Joseph Cirincione and Ray Takeyh, "ElBaradei is Quietly Managing to Disarm Iran," The Financial Times, February 27, 2008
It is a popular parlour game in Washington's corridors of power and European chancelleries to deride Mohamed ElBaradei as a quixotic bureaucrat determined to subvert the western strategy of restraining Iran's nuclear programme. The latest International Atomic Energy Agency report suggesting progress has been made by Iran is quietly disparaged by the Bush administration as another clean pass for the rash theocracy. The point that Mr ElBaradei's critics miss is that he is judiciously achieving the goals that they seemingly desire - the disarmament of the Islamic Republic.

Click here to read the full article.


The early returns are discouraging for a harmonious transition to independence for Kosovo.  The week following Kosovo's dramatic declaration of independence saw sporadic violence in both Serbia and Kosovo, and the international community dividing itself into supporters and opponents of the declaration. While it's unclear how the situation will unfold in the weeks and months ahead, it will certainly be to no one's benefit if the unrest intensifies and the violence of the 1990's resurfaces.

Click here to read the full article.


In northern Uganda, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to stopping or preventing mass atrocities. But there is an effective common strategy that can lead to success, and it is a simple one, built on promoting peace, providing civilian protection, and ensuring punishment of the perpetrators.

Click here to read the full report.


As the dust settles from this past week’s historic elections in Pakistan and the post-election coalition-building efforts now ongoing among the victorious opposition political parties, the United States cannot lose sight of how Pakistan’s leaders tackle the enduring security challenges that the country faces, including the presence of Al Qaeda’s leadership within their country’s borders.

Click here to read the full article.


The results of Pakistan’s February 18 parliamentary elections continue to trickle in, but it is now clear that the opposition parties have summarily defeated the party of President Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, and are demanding change. Despite fears of violence, a population disillusioned with Pakistan’s leaders, and a severely restricted pre-election environment, Pakistanis turned out to vote and made clear that the status quo is no longer acceptable.

Click here to read the full article.


IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei's report on Iran makes it clear that Iran has no intention of addressing the most sensitive of the outstanding questions, namely those that are most closely associated with a nuclear weapons development program. Iran continues to insist that it never had any such program, and considers allegations to this effect to be entirely baseless and not worth addressing. If that's the case, then ElBaradei's transparency process has exhausted itself and it is time for a third UNSC sanctions resolution coupled with a real multilateral negotiation process.

Click here to read the full article.


Regardless of the consequences, the president continues to insist that Iraq and Afghanistan are the same war. Both countries, he said most recently in a speech in early February, “are part of the war on terror. These aren’t separate wars. They’re part of the same war.” From this faulty premise, misguided strategic thinking and misallocated budgets flow, inevitably leading to flawed military deployment and decision-making in both conflicts.

Click here to read the full article.

Expert Commentary

Ask The Expert - P.J. Crowley discusses why we need to re-examine our homeland security strategy. "We’re almost seven years into this thing called the war on terror and we’re long past due for reassessment. Exactly who is it today who threatens us? What is it that they’re most likely to target, and what can we do about that?"

Congressional Quarterly - P.J. Crowley says the Center for American Progress' recent report on homeland security is intended as a guide for the next president. "We don’t think homeland security has received sufficient emphasis from the Bush administration, so primarily it’s a blueprint for what the next administration should consider."

Homeland Security

SeeProgress Button

Middle East Bulletin Logo

Enough Campaign Logo


Event Resources

Restoring America's Military After Iraq
February 28, 2008

After nearly five years of war in Iraq and seven in Afghanistan, the U.S. military is facing a crisis not seen since the end of the Vietnam War. Equipment shortages, manpower shortfalls, recruiting and retention problems, and misplaced budget priorities have resulted in a military barely able to meet the challenges America faces today and dangerously ill-prepared to handle the challenges of the future.

As operations in Iraq eventually draw to a close, we must plot a new strategic direction for our nation’s military. Panelists will discuss the ways in which the United States military will need to reform and reconstitute itself to meet the nation's challenges in the years to come. The event will also be the official release of 'Restoring American Military Power: Toward a New Progressive Defense Strategy for America' by Lawrence Korb and Max Bergmann.

Click here for more information.

Sign up:
Policy e-newsletters
The Progress Report

To unsubscribe, click here


Support the Center for American Progress

Comments, questions:
Email Us

National Security Policy Weekly is a product of the Center for American Progress.

www.americanprogress.org | contact us | unsubscribe