National Security Policy Weekly banner
This Week
  • Iraq Benchmark Report Card, Center for American Progress
  • No Virtue in Necessity, Center for American Progress
  • U.S. Tinkering in Afghanistan, Lawrence J. Korb and Caroline Wadhams
  • Clock Ticks on Two Time Bombs: Attacks in Iraq Raise Questions about Surge, Brian Katulis
  • Abeyi: Sudan's "Kashmir", Roger Winter and John Prendergast
  • Fool Me 936 Times, Eric Alterman and George Zornick
  • Playing Politics with Intelligence: Bush Puts Security at Risk, Mark Agrast
Expert Commentary
  • Nuclear Deals Elusive, Joseph Cirincione
  • Wolfowitz Appointed Chair of Arms-Control Panel, Joseph Cirincione
  • Hurt GIs' Medical Status Altered, Lawrence Korb
  • On a Phased Redeployment, Brian Katulis
This Week

"Iraq Benchmark Report Card: One Year After the Surge," Center for American Progress, January 24, 2008
On the one year anniversary of President Bush’s State of the Union address justifying his "New Way Forward" in Iraq, it is clear that the surge has failed to meet its objectives. One year ago, the president pledged that “America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced." Despite the fact that the Iraqi government has only met three of the 18 benchmarks laid out last year, an end to U.S. military and financial commitment is nowhere in sight.

Click here to read the full article.


In his final State of the Union address, President Bush will contend that the withdrawal of an additional four combat brigades from Iraq—about 25,000 troops— by mid-summer represents his “return on success.” In reality, these 25,000 troops are being withdrawn out of necessity.

Click here to read the full article.


After failing to persuade NATO to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan, the Bush administration has reluctantly approved a temporary increase of 3,200 American troops. While adding these troops is a step in the right direction, it is not enough. Security in Afghanistan has deteriorated over the past two years, with suicide and roadside bombings now at unprecedented levels. Last year was the deadliest on record for U.S. and foreign troops; the Taliban have taken control of most of southern Afghanistan; and Al Qaeda has reestablished its command and control, its funding sources, and its training camps in the borderlands of Pakistan and Afghanistan needs much more than a token, temporary increase in U.S. forces.

Click here to read the full article.


The murder of an Iraqi police chief in a suicide bombing today in the northern city of Mosul and a series of attacks against Sunni militias that the United States has helped create in the past year should lead to more questions about the myth that President Bush’s surge in Iraq has “worked.”

Click here to read the full article.


Sudan is an incredibly complex country. Wars and coups have marked its history since it gained independence in 1956. The country is littered with killing fields, some localized and some with national and regional implications. Perhaps no area is more volatile and carries more implications for Sudan’s future than the oil rich region of Abyei—Sudan’s “Kashmir”—astride the boundary between North and South roughly 500 miles southwest of Khartoum.

Click here to read the full article.

Eric Alterman and George Zornick, "Think Again: Fool Me 936 Times," Center for American Progress, January 24, 2008
A study by the Center for Public Integrity and Fund for Independence in Journalism released yesterday found that in the run-up to the Iraq War, President George W. Bush and his administration made at least 935 demonstrably false statements about the security threat posed by Saddam Hussein. The folly that followed during the execution of operations in Iraq is well documented, but whatever degree of shame is associated with being fooled 935 times apparently isn’t enough to learn a lesson.

Click here to read the full article.

Mark Agrast, "Playing Politics with Intelligence: Bush Puts Security at Risk," Center for American Progress, January 29, 2008
The security of the nation should not be held hostage to political gamesmanship. Congress should extend the Protect America Act for as long as necessary until a more measured and responsible alternative can be put in its place.

Click here to read the full article.

Expert Commentary

AP - Joseph Cirincione discusses Bush's failed strategy to contain the spread of nuclear weapons. "It is clear to everyone that the Bush strategy has failed. The only question is whether he can adjust quickly enough to salvage something from this mess."

Bloomberg News - Joseph Cirincione talks about Paul Wolfowitz's appointment to the International Security Advisory Board. "The advice given by Paul Wolfowitz over the past six years ranks among the worst provided by any defense official in history. I have no idea why anyone would want more."

The Denver Post - Lawrence Korb discusses the Army's decision to send injured soldiers to perform light-duty tasks. "They are in a no-win position. The Army is not big enough to support the surge, deal with Afghanistan and give people a minimum amount of time at home."

CNSNews - Brian Katulis discusses the need for a phased redeployment of military forces from Iraq. " Our argument for a while has been that a defined end-date as a goal for redeployment is actually helpful, because it motivates and creates incentives to get Iraqis to take control of their own affairs and to take care of power-sharing disputes. If the U.S. extends an open-ended commitment without conditions, we could unwittingly foster a culture of dependency that is dangerous and dysfunctional."

Conflict in Lebanon

SeeProgress Button

Middle East Bulletin Logo

Enough Campaign Logo


Event Resources

Plug-in Hybrids: The Future of Cars?
January 31, 2008

U.S. reliance on oil – primarily for transportation – has many negative impacts. To pay for this oil, American consumers send billions of dollars to other countries including some that are incongruent with U.S. interests. And we are dependent on this fuel from countries rife with political instability. Conflicts there can cause the oil price to spike. In short, oil dependence threatens our economy and national security.

In addition, the combustion of oil and petroleum products – particularly gasoline – threatens our environment. Emissions of greenhouse gases from motor vehicles are the second largest source of U.S. global warming pollution.

Congress began to address these problems with the enactment of the Energy Independence and Security Act. President Bush signed it into law on December 19, 2007. It includes the first increase in fuel economy standards since 1975. It would require cars and light trucks to meet an average fuel economy standard of 35 miles per gallon by 2020, with interim steps in the early years.

Now that the new law sets a fuel economy destination, auto companies can travel there via various routes. Some companies, such as General Motors, plan to develop "plug in hybrids" that rely on batteries recharged via AC outlets, combined with gasoline. Other companies plan to develop cars that rely on different fuels. Each system has its advantages and drawbacks.

This event will bring together leaders from General Motors and Honda to discuss their various approaches to achievement of the new fuel economy standards. An impartial automotive engineer from the Union of Concerned Scientists will provide his perspective as well. The ultimate technology "winner" could affect our transportation system for years to come.

Click here for more information.

Sign up:
Policy e-newsletters
The Progress Report

To unsubscribe, click here


Support the Center for American Progress

Comments, questions:
Email Us

National Security Policy Weekly is a product of the Center for American Progress.

www.americanprogress.org | contact us | unsubscribe