The 10 States Most Threatened by High-Hazard, Deficient Dams
SOURCE: AP/Bruce Asato
See also: Ensuring Public Safety by Investing in Our Nation’s Critical Dams and Levees by Keith Miller, Kristina Costa, and Donna Cooper
Our nation’s infrastructure is in widespread disrepair, but to see where the collapse is particularly threatening to our society and our economy, look no further than our 84,000-plus dams. Consider the following facts:
- More than 28,000 dams—about one-third of all dams in the United States—are already more than 50 years old, the standard intended lifespan of most dams.
- By 2030 more than 70 percent of dams are expected to be at least 50 years old.
- About 14,000 dams across the country are classified as “high-hazard” dams, meaning a dam failure or operational error could result in the loss of human life.
- In 2008 more than 2,000 of these high-hazard dams were also rated structurally “deficient,” meaning they were at serious risk of failure.
These economic and human costs of dam failures are real and substantial, as we detail in a new report, “Ensuring Public Safety by Investing in Our Nation’s Critical Dams and Levees,” released today. The 2003 Silver Lake Dam failure in Michigan, for instance, caused $100 million in damages and put more than 1,000 miners temporarily out of work. Forty-eight homes were destroyed and 53 damaged when Mississippi’s Big Bay Lake Dam failed in 2004. And in 2006 the privately owned Kaloko Reservoir Dam in Hawaii failed, killing seven people and releasing more than 300 million gallons of water. The Kaloko dam was more than 100 years old and had never once been inspected by a state dam safety official prior to its failure.
More than two-thirds of all dams are privately owned, and it’s not the government’s responsibility to pick up the tab for repairing private dams. Nevertheless, state governments should be responsible for inspecting all nonfederal dams—and the resources should be made available to make such inspections possible. This is particularly important because the federal government often foots the bill for the cleanup and consequences when dams fail and communities suffer damage, usually costing taxpayers much more than repairs and inspections would have.
Piecemeal and widely varying oversight among states compounds the challenges inherent in inspecting, maintaining, repairing, and¾where environmentally and economically appropriate¾breaching tens of thousands of dams across the country. Case in point: The National Inventory of Dams counts 2,228 dams in Alabama, 201 of which are classified as high hazard, yet Alabama has no dam-safety program and spends $0 annually inspecting and maintaining dams. While Alabama is fortunately the only state without a dam-safety program, it’s not the only state where citizens’ lives and property are at risk due to failing dams.
Communities in every state are at risk due to the presence of high-hazard dams in need of repair. Below we list the 10 states with the most state-regulated, high-hazard dams in need of repair in 2010.
Even more troubling, six states reported all of their state-regulated, high-hazard dams as “not rated” for structural soundness in 2010. These states are Texas, South Carolina, Hawaii, Florida, South Dakota, and Alaska. Not having a state dam-safety program, Alabama also did not report condition information on their high-hazard dams in 2010. In 2008, 300 of Texas’s high-hazard dams were reported as being in need of repair, as were 59 of Hawaii’s.
Without sufficient action and resources to assess, repair, and, when appropriate, remove dams in all 50 states, the number of deficient dams will only continue to increase, putting ever more lives and property at risk.
See our report, “Ensuring Public Safety by Investing in Our Nation’s Critical Dams and Levees,” to learn what Congress, the Obama administration, and statehouses across our country can do about this growing hazard.
Donna Cooper is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. Kristina Costa is a Research Assistant with the Economic Policy team at the Center. Keith Miller, an intern at the Center, contributed research.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, health care, gun-violence prevention)
202.741.6285 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Anne Shoup (foreign policy and national security, energy, LGBT issues)
202.481.7146 or email@example.com
Print: Crystal Patterson (immigration)
202.478.6350 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Madeline Meth (women's issues, poverty, Legal Progress)
202.741.6277 or email@example.com
Print: Tanya Arditi (Spanish language and ethnic media)
202.741.6258 or firstname.lastname@example.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or email@example.com
Radio: Madeline Meth
202.741.6277 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or email@example.com