Iraq, Pentagon spending and the Iowa Caucuses
Residents of the Hawkeye state will no doubt hear plenty of plans in the coming months about how America should deal with the mess in Iraq.And for good reason. The mess in Iraq clearly deserves priority attention by our political leaders and foreign policy analysts.
But as we inevitably disengage from Iraq, it's essential that America evaluate not just what went wrong there but also take a broader look at America's national security requirements and whether the Pentagon budget is sufficient to protect America.
Contrary to the common (and of ten unquestioned) assumption, spending more money doesn't necessarily buy us more security.
The Pentagon currently absorbs more than half of the federal government's discretionary budget at a whopping $500 billion proposed for next year surpassing the heights reached in the 1980s when I was President Reagan's assistant secretary of defense. This baseline budget doesn't even include the money spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Read more here.
This article was originally published in Press-Citizen.com.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogress.org
Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org
Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org
Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org
Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org
