Focus on Interests, Not Personalities
President Bush’s six-day tour of Latin America will include stops in Uruguay and Colombia over the weekend. Both stops will inadvertently highlight a long-standing failing of U.S. policy toward the Americas—the personalization of policy.In dealing with the Americas, perhaps more so than with any other part of the world, the United States, to our long-term detriment, tends to simplify complex issues into single individuals.
More often than not, the person upon whom we focus is
vilified, and U.S.
policy becomes exclusively dedicated to counteracting the individual rather
than to pursuing our interests in a clear-headed manner. Over-emphasizing
single individuals is not, however, unique to our dealings with our perceived
enemies in the region—we tend to do it with our friends as well. The
president’s weekend stops will underscore the perils and pitfalls that arise
from both.
The classic example of a vilified leader with whom U.S. policy has become obsessed is, of course, Cuba’s Fidel
Castro. The modern example is Venezuela’s
Hugo Chávez.
The Bush administration sees Chávez
as a threat that must be contained, and the president is making this evident in
almost every aspect of his trip. The president’s invocations of social justice
as well as his staking a claim to the legacy of Simoón
Bolivar in laying out his goals for the trip were obvious signs of Chávez ’s
shadow. And, as if to remove all doubt, President Bush took a page straight out
of the Castro-Chávez playbook by announcing that he
would be sending U.S.
doctors to the region to provide medical services to the poor.
President Bush’s time in Uruguay
is another clear sign of the degree of his obsession with Chávez
and the damage it has already inflicted on the pursuit of U.S. interests
in the region. His visit with Uruguayan President Tabaré
Vázquez is meant to signal that the United States can work with the democratic left
in Latin America, even if it won’t work with Chávez.
Yet it reveals how much the Bush administration’s focus on Chávez has complicated U.S. relations with the rest of the
hemisphere. There should never have been any question of the willingness or
ability to work with governments that do not share the Bush administration’s
narrow ideology. Six years of ranting about the dangers of Chávez’s
leftist ideology, however, created real and debilitating questions that have
unnecessarily complicated the pursuit of U.S.
interests in the Americas.
When President Bush ventures from Uruguay
to Colombia
on Sunday, he will temporarily set aside his Chávez obsession,
but he will not stray from the practice of placing too much emphasis on a
single individual. In the case of Colombia, that individual is
President Alvaro Uribe, President Bush’s closest ally
in the region.
Although the massive level of U.S.
support for Colombia under
the rubric of Plan Colombia
predates President Uribe, he has come to personify U.S. interests in Colombia,
rendering support for Colombia
and support for Uribe virtually indistinguishable.
Yet the United States’ support for Colombia, focused on
President Uribe, is now becoming more complicated as Uribe finds himself in the midst of a growing political
scandal arising from deep connections between Colombia’s governing elites and
the country’s narco-terrorist paramilitary organizations.
Eight members of the Colombian Congress—all Uribe
supporters—as well as Uribe’s former confidant and
former head of the secret police have been arrested in the still-unfolding
scandal. Not surprisingly, this has led to unfortunate questions about whether
the United States should continue
its support of Colombia.
These revelations and the ones that are almost certain to
come should not prompt us to turn our backs on Colombia. The scandal does not
change the United States’
interest in fighting drugs and promoting stability in Colombia, nor does it alter the
need to pursue these ends intelligently. It should, however, serve as a
reminder that we cannot rest our interests on one person; the successful
pursuit of U.S. policy in Colombia
requires fundamental institutional advancements that transcend any individual.
President Bush would be well served to remember as he
travels through Uruguay and Colombia this weekend that U.S. policy in the region needs to
move beyond easy labels, villains and men in proverbial white hats. American
policy should focus instead on the kinds of bold initiatives discussed in the
Center for American Progress report “Lost
in the Americas: President Bush’s Strategy Free Trip to the Americas,”
which could revitalize relations with our too long neglected neighbors.
For more information on the President’s trip in the Americas,
please see Lost
in the Americas: President Bush’s Strategy-Free Trip to the Americas.
For more on a more effective means of dealing with Venezuela’s
Hugo Chávez, please see the CAP report “U.S.-Venezuela
Policy: A Reality-Based Approach.”
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Suzi Emmerling (foreign policy and security, energy, education, immigration)
202.481.8224 or semmerling@americanprogress.org
Print: Jason Rahlan (health care, economy, civil rights, poverty)
202.481.8132 or jrahlan@americanprogress.org
Radio: John Neurohr
202.481.8182 or jneurohr@americanprogress.org
TV: Andrea Purse
202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org
Web: Erin Lindsay
202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org