RSS | Newsletters | Facebook CAP en Español
Center for American Progress Center for American Progress
Issues National Security U.S. Military

A Progressive Quadrennial Defense Review

Restoring American Military Power

Read the full report (PDF, Updated 2/2/06)

Executive Summary:

The United States enters the 21st century with unmatched military power and unprecedented challenges.  In order to meet these challenges, the Department of Defense over the next four years must begin a fundamental shift in military doctrine and priorities so that this country is better positioned to respond to the threats of a post-Cold War and post-9/11 world and to project power whenever and wherever necessary. 

This Quadrennial Defense Review outlines a strategy that gives top priority to protecting the homeland, investing in military personnel, and preventing conflicts.  It gives the military the manpower and technology it needs to best combat asymmetric threats from non-state actors such as terrorist groups, to deter and contain traditional enemies, and to fulfill its responsibilities in post-conflict situations.  It aims to produce a more powerful, flexible, and agile military force that can best protect the American people and advance U.S. national interests.  Implemented over time, it will rebalance forces and weaponry in order to allow the United States to protect the homeland, fight one major regional conflict, engage simultaneously in two substantial post-conflict missions, and contain conflict in three regions. 

This strategy is based on the twin principles of realism and integration.  Realism to best respond to the threats the U.S. faces, to allocate limited financial resources available for defense in a cost-effective manner, and to redefine the military's capabilities and responsibilities after the fighting ends.  Integration to best unite the efforts of the different armed services and non-military government agencies, to get the most from alliances across the globe, and to rebalance spending to allow the United States to go beyond the military and exercise all the instruments of power.

Read the full report (PDF, Updated 2/2/06)

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogress.org

Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org

Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org

TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org

Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org

Subscribe to RSS Feeds

RSS IconSite-Wide and Issue-Specific RSS Feeds

Related Materials

Event: A Discussion on the Obama Administration's National Security Policy

Panetta’s Trimmed Defense Budget Is a Good First Step—but It Isn’t Enough, by Lawrence J. Korb, Max Hoffman, Alex Rothman

A More Agile and Sustainable Military Posture

Military Benefits Must Be Cut, by Lawrence J. Korb

Obama’s Republican Plan for the Pentagon , by Lawrence J. Korb

Also by Lawrence J. Korb

Panetta’s Trimmed Defense Budget Is a Good First Step—but It Isn’t Enough, January 27, 2012

The Right Cuts, January 25, 2012

Military Benefits Must Be Cut, January 11, 2012

Also by Caroline Wadhams

The Big Loser at Bonn Will Be Pakistan, December 3, 2011

Milestones for Transition in Afghanistan 2012–2014, December 2, 2011

What Former Afghan Leader Rabbani Knew About Pakistan and Peace, October 3, 2011

Also by Andrew J. Grotto

The Real Breakthrough at the Russia Summit, July 9, 2009

Credible Missile Defenses Needed, June 24, 2009

Nuclear Security Cooperation Between the United States and Pakistan, June 24, 2009