RSS | Newsletters | Facebook CAP en Español
Center for American Progress Center for American Progress
Issues National Security War in Iraq

Strategic Redeployment


A Progressive Plan for Iraq and the Struggle Against Violent Extremists

Read Full Report (PDF)

The Bush administration's numerous mistakes - sending in too few troops and not providing proper guidance or equipment as well as its frequent changes in the strategy for Iraq's political transition and reconstruction - have left us with no good options. The status quo is untenable, eroding American power and weakening our ability to keep America secure. But simply shifting gears into reverse and implementing a hasty withdrawal from Iraq is not the answer.

In the absence of fresh ideas, the American public has had to settle for a simplistic debate centered on a false choice - should US forces "stay the course" in Iraq or "cut and run?" These extreme positions avoid the fundamental question the country should debate: Is our government using all its powers effectively to defeat our country's enemies? The answer to that question is a resounding no. The key is focusing on Iraq in the broader context of the global security threats the United States faces.

The United States needs to pursue a plan of Strategic Redeployment. Strategic Redeployment is a threat-based strategy to target our efforts against global terrorist networks and bring greater stability to Iraq and its neighborhood. This approach will minimize the damage to the United States in the short term, mitigate the drawbacks of our eventual withdrawal from Iraq, and secure our interests in the long term. Strategic Redeployment differs from other plans for what to do in Iraq by recognizing that Iraq is now connected to a broader battle against global terrorist networks - even though it was not before the Bush administration's invasion. Strategic Redeployment also means re-engaging our allies, building a platform for multilateral cooperation that counters the terrorist threats we face, rather than relying on ad-hoc "coalitions of the willing."

Strategic Redeployment has four main components: military realignment that restores a realistic deployment policy for our active and reserve forces and moves troops to other hot spots in the struggle against global terrorist networks or brings them home to rebuild; a global communications campaign to counter misinformation and hateful ideologies; new regional diplomatic initiatives; and smarter support for Iraq's renewal and reconstruction.

Date Created: 9/29/2005 2:14:14 PM

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogress.org

Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org

Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org

TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org

Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org

Subscribe to RSS Feeds

RSS IconSite-Wide and Issue-Specific RSS Feeds

Related Materials

Ask the Expert: What China's Leadership Transition Means for the United States, by Melanie Hart

Getting Smarter on China , by Rudy deLeon, Melanie Hart, Ali Fisher

The Obama Administration’s National Security Strategy

How to Stop the Bloodshed in Syria, by Sarah Margon, Brian Katulis

The Snake Oil of “Who Lost Iraq?”, by Matthew Duss

Also by Lawrence J. Korb

Panetta’s Trimmed Defense Budget Is a Good First Step—but It Isn’t Enough, January 27, 2012

The Right Cuts, January 25, 2012

Military Benefits Must Be Cut, January 11, 2012

Also by Brian Katulis

Egypt’s Uncertain Revolution, February 10, 2012

China’s Quiet Role in Pressuring Iran, February 8, 2012

How to Stop the Bloodshed in Syria, February 6, 2012