How About an Offset for War Funding?
Given the fact that congressional Republicans like House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) are now arguing that the cost of aiding the victims of Hurricane Irene should be offset by reductions in other parts of the federal budget, how do they justify their votes in favor of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without raising taxes to pay for the huge cost of the wars? In fact, Republicans like Rep. Cantor actually voted to cut taxes as the Bush administration sent hundreds of thousands of troops into those two war zones.
This was the first time in our nation's history that we did not raise taxes when we sent significant numbers of brave young Americans into harm's way. For example, in FY 1969, Lyndon Johnson's last year in office, when we had 540,000 troops in Vietnam, the Democratic president and Democratic Congress actually balanced the federal budget. How? We had a war surtax.
Read more here.
This article was originally published in Richmond Times Dispatch.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters@americanprogress.org
Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org
Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org
Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org
Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org
