RSS | Newsletters | Facebook CAP en Español
Center for American Progress Center for American Progress
Issues National Security War in Iraq

President Bush Is Up to His Old Tricks Again on Iraq Funding

President Bush’s request yesterday for an additional $196 billion in war funding would bring the projected cost of the war to date to nearly $610 billion. This is more than 10 times the original $50-60 billion cost estimate provided by the White House budget director in 2002.

So far the war has cost an average of $102.7 billion per year, which puts the total cost on pace to top $1 trillion in just four years. The potential financial costs are even greater given Bush’s desire for an open-ended commitment of U.S. troops to Iraq. Over the next nine fiscal years, a 70,000-strong U.S. troop presence will cost an additional $493 billion, making the total cost of war for the next nine years over $1.1 trillion.

President Bush has repeatedly waited until the last minute to present his supplemental funding requests, demanding that Congress pass it unconditionally lest they risk endangering the troops. Once again, Bush has pulled the same old trick, declaring, “Congress should not go home for the holidays while our troops are still waiting for the funds they need.”

It is the administration’s delay in sending its funding request to Congress, not Congress’ necessary deliberations on the request, that endangers funding of American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. If President Bush were truly a responsible commander-in-chief, he would have either incorporated war funding in his regular budget request or sent a supplemental to Congress earlier.

The use of supplemental funding bills also allows the Bush administration to obscure the necessary discussion on overall national security priorities. It fails to put the war in perspective of our overall defense spending, making the costs seem smaller than they actually are.

Fully two-thirds of the American public—67 percent—supported cutting the White House’s latest request for additional funding. Congress should stand up to President Bush on this funding request and continue to take steps to push for a Strategic Reset in Iraq policy centered on a phased redeployment and intensified diplomatic efforts to resolve Iraq’s conflicts.

More on Iraq spending:

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogress.org

Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogress.org

Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogress.org

TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogress.org

Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogress.org

Subscribe to RSS Feeds

RSS IconSite-Wide and Issue-Specific RSS Feeds

Related Materials

The Snake Oil of “Who Lost Iraq?”, by Matthew Duss

Update: The Iraq War Ledger, by Matthew Duss, Peter Juul

Turning the Page in Iraq, by Brian Katulis

U.S.-Iraq Relations Enter a New Era, by Peter Juul

The Iraq War Unnecessarily Prolonged the Conflict in Afghanistan, by Lawrence J. Korb

Also by Brian Katulis

China’s Quiet Role in Pressuring Iran, February 8, 2012

How to Stop the Bloodshed in Syria, February 6, 2012

Support Pluralism in Egypt’s Transition , January 27, 2012

Also by Peter Juul

China’s Quiet Role in Pressuring Iran, February 8, 2012

Obama’s Leaner National Security Strategy Got the Job Done in 2011, January 23, 2012

U.S. Military Strategy Shifts Focus, December 20, 2011